Skip to main content
Log in

Digital piracy: Causes, consequences, and strategic responses

  • PERSPECTIVES
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What should copyright holders do about the piracy of digital media? This paper first discusses the causes of piracy, with particular reference to the factors that lead consumers to engage in piracy en masse. Then it explores the consequences of piracy for copyright holders. The final section of the paper builds upon the proceeding sections to look at the different strategic responses copyright holders can adopt to deal with piracy. Given widespread digital piracy in Asia, these insights have particular relevance for the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data accessed from http://www.ifpi.org

  2. See the 2005 Piracy Report from the Business Software Alliance at http://www.bsa.org

  3. Data accessed from http://www.mpaa.org/anti-piracy/

  4. RIAA. Market Data, archived at http://www.riaa.org

  5. comScore Matrix, “Sharp Decline in Music File Swapping,” Press Release, January 4, 2004, archived at http://comscore.com.

  6. M. Dickie, “Starbucks wins case against Chinese copycat,” Financial Times, January 3, 2006, page 1

References

  • Adams, J. S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67: 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, J. 2001. Sonic boom. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B. W. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99: 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., & Cornwell, L. 1989. College students believe piracy is acceptable. CIS Educators Forum, 2–5.

  • Conner, K. R., & Rumelt, R. P. 1991. Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Science, 37: 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Astous, A., Colbert, F., & Montpetit, D. 2005. Music piracy on the web—How effective are anti-piracy arguments? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28: 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givon, M., Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. 1995. Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 59: 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, R. S., & Wood, W. A. 1996. Situational determinants of software piracy: An equity theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 1189–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. B., Gould, S. J., & Pola, B. 2004. To pirate or not to pirate: A comparative study of the ethical versus other influences on the consumer’s software acquisition mode decision. Journal of Business Ethics, 55: 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. 1989. Why people copy software and create computer viruses: Individual characteristics and situational factors. Information Resource Management Journal, 28–37.

  • Haruvy, E., Mahajan, V., & Prasad, A. 2004. The effect of piracy on the market penetration of subscription software. Journal of Business, 77: S81–S107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S. 2003. Trends and patterns among online software pirates. Ethics and Information Technology, 5: 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16: 366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, K. 1990. An investigation of equity as a determinant of user information satisfaction. Decision Sciences, 21: 786–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabanoff, B. 1991. Equity, equality, power, and conflict. Academy of Management Review, 16: 416–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kini, R. B., Ramakrishna, H. V., & Vijayaraman, V. 2004. Shaping moral intensity regarding software piracy: A comparison between Thailand and U.S. students. Journal of Business Ethics, 49: 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. 1969. Stage and sequence: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In Growling, D. (Ed.). Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. New York: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. J. 2004. File sharing: Creative destruction or just plain destruction? Working paper, School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas.

  • Logsdon, J. M., Thompson, J. K., & Reid, R. A. 1994. Software piracy: Is it related to level of moral judgment? Journal of Business Ethics, 13: 849–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2005. Digital broadband content: Music. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oz, E. 1990. The attitude of managers-to-be towards software piracy. OR/MS Today, 17: 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2005. From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2006. Global strategy. Cincinnati: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. 1983. The diffusion of innovations. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. 1999. Information rules. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., Cheng, H. K., & Teegen, H. 1996. Towards a profile of student software pirates. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 839–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. L., & O’Brian, J. A. 1990. The effect of demographic factors on attitudes toward software piracy. Journal of Computer Information Systems.

  • Tan, B. 2002. Understanding consumer ethical decision making with respect to purchasing pirated software. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19: 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R. L. 2005. New era, new realities: Musings on a new research agenda... from an old timer. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles W. L. Hill.

Additional information

I thank Mike Peng (Editor-in-Chief) for his interest, encouragement, and hands-on editorial assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, C.W.L. Digital piracy: Causes, consequences, and strategic responses. Asia Pacific J Manage 24, 9–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9025-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9025-0

Keywords

Navigation