Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 9–25 | Cite as

Digital piracy: Causes, consequences, and strategic responses

  • Charles W. L. HillEmail author


What should copyright holders do about the piracy of digital media? This paper first discusses the causes of piracy, with particular reference to the factors that lead consumers to engage in piracy en masse. Then it explores the consequences of piracy for copyright holders. The final section of the paper builds upon the proceeding sections to look at the different strategic responses copyright holders can adopt to deal with piracy. Given widespread digital piracy in Asia, these insights have particular relevance for the region.


Digital piracy Digital media Copyright holder Strategic responses 


  1. Adams, J. S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67: 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderman, J. 2001. Sonic boom. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, B. W. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99: 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen, C. M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, E., & Cornwell, L. 1989. College students believe piracy is acceptable. CIS Educators Forum, 2–5.Google Scholar
  6. Conner, K. R., & Rumelt, R. P. 1991. Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Science, 37: 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Astous, A., Colbert, F., & Montpetit, D. 2005. Music piracy on the web—How effective are anti-piracy arguments? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Givon, M., Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. 1995. Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 59: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glass, R. S., & Wood, W. A. 1996. Situational determinants of software piracy: An equity theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 1189–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta, P. B., Gould, S. J., & Pola, B. 2004. To pirate or not to pirate: A comparative study of the ethical versus other influences on the consumer’s software acquisition mode decision. Journal of Business Ethics, 55: 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrington, S. 1989. Why people copy software and create computer viruses: Individual characteristics and situational factors. Information Resource Management Journal, 28–37.Google Scholar
  12. Haruvy, E., Mahajan, V., & Prasad, A. 2004. The effect of piracy on the market penetration of subscription software. Journal of Business, 77: S81–S107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinduja, S. 2003. Trends and patterns among online software pirates. Ethics and Information Technology, 5: 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, T. M. 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16: 366–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joshi, K. 1990. An investigation of equity as a determinant of user information satisfaction. Decision Sciences, 21: 786–807.Google Scholar
  16. Kabanoff, B. 1991. Equity, equality, power, and conflict. Academy of Management Review, 16: 416–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kini, R. B., Ramakrishna, H. V., & Vijayaraman, V. 2004. Shaping moral intensity regarding software piracy: A comparison between Thailand and U.S. students. Journal of Business Ethics, 49: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kohlberg, L. 1969. Stage and sequence: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In Growling, D. (Ed.). Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  19. Liebowitz, S. J. 2004. File sharing: Creative destruction or just plain destruction? Working paper, School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas.Google Scholar
  20. Logsdon, J. M., Thompson, J. K., & Reid, R. A. 1994. Software piracy: Is it related to level of moral judgment? Journal of Business Ethics, 13: 849–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2005. Digital broadband content: Music. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Oz, E. 1990. The attitude of managers-to-be towards software piracy. OR/MS Today, 17: 24–26.Google Scholar
  24. Peng, M. W. 2005. From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peng, M. W. 2006. Global strategy. Cincinnati: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  26. Rogers, E. 1983. The diffusion of innovations. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  27. Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. 1999. Information rules. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sims, R. R., Cheng, H. K., & Teegen, H. 1996. Towards a profile of student software pirates. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 839–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Solomon, S. L., & O’Brian, J. A. 1990. The effect of demographic factors on attitudes toward software piracy. Journal of Computer Information Systems.Google Scholar
  30. Tan, B. 2002. Understanding consumer ethical decision making with respect to purchasing pirated software. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19: 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tung, R. L. 2005. New era, new realities: Musings on a new research agenda... from an old timer. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations