Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 537–557 | Cite as

Creating relational rents: The effect of business groups on affiliated firms’ performance in Indonesia

Article

Abstract

This research attempts to extend the discussion of business groups in emerging economies by treating business groups as a form of interorganizational network that generates relational rents among affiliated firms by creating technological and managerial capabilities. Based on the relational view, this research investigates whether value created by business groups depends upon sharing, combining, and exchanging unique and specific resources or assets among affiliated firms. Results show that technological capabilities contribute to create relational rents in terms of affiliated firms’ investment in R&D and human capital. Managerial capabilities also contributed to generating relational rents through investment in managerial knowledge acquisition for affiliated firms without R&D units and in training for affiliated firms with R&D units. However, learning by exporting and learning from imported input do not yield relational rents within business groups. Overall, these findings reveal that business groups as interorganizational networks are contingent on their internal, unique, and specific capabilities, as social capital theory argues.

Keywords

Business groups Relational rents Capabilities Indonesian firms 

References

  1. Ahmadjian, C. L., & Lincoln, J. R. 2001. Keiretsu, governance, and learning: Case studies in change from the Japanese automotive industry. Organization Science, 12: 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhaduri, S., & Ray, A. S. 2004. Exporting through technological capability: Econometric evidence from India’s pharmaceutical and electrical/electronics firms. Oxford Development Studies, 32: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. 1993. Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrast between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2: 157–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. J. 2004. Learning from exporting revisited in a less developed setting. Journal of Development Economics, 75: 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blalock, G., & Veloso, F. 2003. Trade, technology transfer and productivity growth: The neglected role of imports. Working paper, Cornell University. http://www.aem.cornell.edu/faculty_sites/gb78/hfdi.pdf.
  7. Capanelli, G. 1997. Industry-wide relocation and technology transfer by Japanese electronics firms: A study on buyer–supplier relations in Malaysia. Unpublished dissertation, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  8. Caves, R. & Uekusa, M. 1976. Industrial organization in Japan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. 2000. Economic performance of the Korean business groups: Intra-group resource sharing and internal business transaction. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chua, C. 2005. The conglomerates in crisis: Indonesia, 1997–1998. Paper presented at Asia Pacific Journal of Management Special Issue Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
  11. Clerides, S. K., Lach, S., & Tybout, J. R. 1998. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 903–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. H., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dieleman, M., & Sachs, W. 2005. The Salim Group: Oscillating between a relationship-based and a market-based model. Paper presented at Asia Pacific Journal of Management Special Issue Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
  14. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ernst, D., Mytelka, L., & Ganiatsos, T. (Eds). 1998. Technological capabilities and export success in Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Field, A. 2000. Discovering statistics: Using SPSS for Windows. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 603–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guillen, M. F. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatch, N. W., & Dyer, J. H. 2004. Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1155–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, K., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. 2001. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hobday, M. 1995. Innovation in East Asia: The challenge to Japan. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. Hoskission, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 268–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. 2001. Estimating the performance of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., & Hong, J. 2004. The evolution and restructuring of diversified business groups in emerging markets: The lessons from chaebols in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Wan, W. P. 2004. Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 613–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm: Combinative capabilities and replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lall, S. 1992. Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20: 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, J. R., & Chen, J. S. 2003. Internationalization, local adaptation, and subsidiary’s entrepreneurship: An exploratory study on Taiwanese manufacturing firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 50–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J.M. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 615–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madanmohan, T. R., Kumar, U., & Kumar, V. 2004. Import-led technological capability: A comparative analysis of Indian and Indonesian manufacturing firms. Technovation, 24: 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahmood, I. P., & Mitchell, W. 2004. Two faces: Effects of business group on innovation in emerging economies. Management Science, 50: 1348–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. 1996. Corporate diversification and organizational structure: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): 340–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mathews, J. A. 2002. Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 586–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77–91.Google Scholar
  38. Mursitama, T. N. 2005. An empirical study on technological capability of Indonesian firms: Lessons from Japan and NIEs. NIPPON, Center for Japanese Studies University of Indonesia, Publication Series, 5: 23–51.Google Scholar
  39. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nelson, R. R. 1991. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nieto, M., & Quevedo, P. 2005. Absorptive capacity, technology opportunity, knowledge spillover, and innovative effort. Technovation, 25: 1141–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutions change, and economic performance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Peng, M. W. 2002. Towards and institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rasiah, R., & Tamale, H. 2004. Productivity, exports, skills and technological capabilities: A study of foreign and local manufacturing firms in Uganda. Discussion paper series INTECH, 2004-1, United Nations University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  45. Rosser, A. 2002. The politics of economic liberalization in Indonesia: State, market, and power. Surrey: Curzon.Google Scholar
  46. Salomon, R. M., & Shaver, J. M. 2005. Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14: 431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sato, Y. 1994. The development of business groups in Indonesia: 1967–1989. In Shiraishi, T. (Ed.), Approaching Suharto’s Indonesia from the margins: 101–153, Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  48. Sato, Y. 1996. The Astra Group: A pioneer of management modernization in Indonesia. The Developing Economies, 34: 247–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sato, Y. 2003a. Post-crisis economic reform in Indonesia: Policy for intervening in ownership in historical perspective. IDE Research Paper, 4: 1–52.Google Scholar
  50. Sato, Y. 2003b. Corporate governance in Indonesia: A study on governance of business groups. In Y. Shimomura (Ed.) The role of governance in Asia: 88–136, Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  51. Sato, Y. 2004. Corporate ownership and management in Indonesia: Does it change? In Basri, M. C., & Van de Eng, P (Eds.) Business in Indonesia: New challenges, old problems: 158–177, Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  52. Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27–43.Google Scholar
  53. Takii, S. 2004. Productivity differentials between local and foreign plants in Indonesian manufacturing, 1995. World Development, 11: 1957–1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thee, K. W. 2001. Channels of international technology transfer in Indonesia: A brief survey. Working paper, 2001-32, ICSEAD, Kitakyushu, Japan.Google Scholar
  56. Thee, K. W. 2006. Technology and Indonesia’s industrial competitiveness. Discussion paper No. 43, ADB Institute, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  57. Tsai, W. 2000. Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 925–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organizational Science, 13(2): 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sjoholm, F. 1999. Exports, imports and productivity: Results from Indonesian establishment data. World Development, 27: 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Warta Ekonomi. 2005. Perusahaan Idaman 2005 (Ideal Companies 2005). December, 29. http://www.wartaekonomi.com).
  61. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Guest editors’ introduction strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang, C. H. 2003. Exporting and productivity: A firm-level analysis of the Taiwan electronics industry. The Developing Economies, 41: 340–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yiu, D., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. 2005. Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gakushuin University, Graduate School of ManagementTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations