Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 5–27 | Cite as

Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization



This review article starts from the question: how does the global business system appear to a challenger firm, and how have challenger Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) from formerly peripheral areas such as the Asia Pacific established themselves successfully, against the sometimes fierce resistance of incumbents? To answer this question, the review develops an argument concerning the pluralistic character of the process of globalization, as contrasted with the conventional account that sees global processes creating uniformity and convergence. This alternative account is based on a review of the experiences of latecomer and newcomer MNEs, particularly those from the Asia Pacific—such as Acer, Ispat International, Li & Fung and the Hong Leong Group—that are dubbed “Dragon Multinationals.” I argue that the innovative features that these MNEs share, such as their accelerated internationalization, strategic innovation and organizational innovation, fit particularly well with the characteristics of the emergent global economy as one of complex inter-firm linkages. The core proposition of the review is that this complementarity between the characteristics of the emergent global economy and latecomer and newcomer strategic and organizational innovations is what drives the remarkable success of these Asia Pacific firms in establishing themselves as serious international players. Such a proposition carries implications for the process of globalization as well as for the dominant frameworks utilized in International Business. The review argues that Dragon Multinationals adopt a different perspective to the resources accessed through internationalization, and that this requires a rethink of the criteria normally utilized in resource-based accounts of strategy. The challenger firm internationalizing in order to access resources also poses a challenge to the dominant OLI (ownership, locational, internalization) account of multinational advantage. Thus it is argued that the question posed at the outset goes to the core of the IB frameworks, and thereby counts as one of the ‘big questions’ that should guide research in IB in the 21st century.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acs, Z., Morck, R., Shaver, J. M., & Yeung, B. 1997. The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: A policy perspective. Small Business Economics, 9: 7–20.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, O. 1993. On the internationalization process of firms: A critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2): 209–231.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, P. H., Blenker, P., & Christensen, P. R. 1997. Generic routes to subcontractors' internationalization. In I. Bjorkman and M. Forsgren (eds.), The nature of the international firm. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. 1996. Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 5(5): 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.Google Scholar
  6. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 2000. Going global: Lessons from late movers. Harvard Business Review, Mar–Apr.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, J., McNaughton, R., & Young, S. 2001. ‘Born-again global’ firms: An extension to the ‘born global’ phenomenon. Journal of International Management, 7(3): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloodgood, J. M., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. 1996. The internationalization of new high-potential US ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4): 61–76.Google Scholar
  9. Buckley, P. 2002. Is the International Business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 365–373.Google Scholar
  10. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
  11. Calof, J. C., & Beamish, P. 1995. Adapting to foreign markets: Explaining internationalization. International Business Review, 4(2): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caves, R. E. 1996. Multinational enterprise and economic analysis (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chen H. M., & Chen, T. J. 1998. Network linkage and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 445–468.Google Scholar
  14. Chi, T. L., & McGuire, D. J. 1996. Collaborative ventures and value of learning: Integrating the transaction cost and strategic option perspectives on the choice of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2): 285–307.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, T., & Knowles, L. L. 2003. Global myopia: Globalization theory in International Business. Journal of International Management, 9: 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coviello, N., & McAuley, A. 1999. Internationalisation and the smaller firm: A review of contemporary empirical research. Management International Review, 39(3): 223–256.Google Scholar
  17. Coviello, N., & Munro, H. J. 1997. Network relationships and the internationalization process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6(2): 1–26.Google Scholar
  18. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. 2001. Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 1028–1038.Google Scholar
  19. Dimitratos, P., Johnson, J. E., Slow, J., & Young, S. 2003. Micromultinationals: New types of firms for the global competitive landscape. European Management Journal, 21(2): 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunning, J. H. 1981. The eclectic theory of the MNC. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 3 rd quarter: 461–491.Google Scholar
  23. Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A., & Sharma, D. D. 1997. Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 337–360.Google Scholar
  24. Forsgren, M., & Johanson, J. 1992. Managing internationalization in business networks. In M. Forsgren and J. Johanson (eds.), Managing networks in international business. Philadelphia: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
  25. Forsgren, M. 1999. Some critical notes on learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model. WP #99/23. Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  26. Fujita, M. 1995. Small and medium-sized transnational corporations: salient features. Small Business Economics, 7: 251–271.Google Scholar
  27. Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S., & Olsen, D. M. 2000. Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hedlund, G. 1993. Introduction. In G. Hedlund (ed.), Organization of transnational corporations. United Nations Library on Transnational Corporations, Volume 6. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hoschka, T., & Livingston, J. 2002. McKinsey Quarterly, 1: 6–9.Google Scholar
  31. Hymer, S. 1960/1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1960 PhD Thesis).Google Scholar
  32. Ibeh, K., Johnson, J. E., Dimitratos, P., & Slow, J. 2004. Micromultinationals: Some preliminary evidence on an emergent ‘star’ of the international entrepreneurship field. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. 1988. Internationalization in industrial systems—a network approach. In N. Hood and J. E. Vahlne (eds.), Strategies in global competition. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  34. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. 1993. Network positions and strategic action–-an analytical framework. In B. Axelsson and G. Easton (eds.), Industrial networks: A new view of reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Kindleberger, C. P. 1970. The international corporation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. 1996. The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. Advances in International Marketing, 8: 11–26.Google Scholar
  37. Kohn, T. O. 1997. Small firms as international players. Small Business Economics, 9: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumar, K., & McLeod, M. G. (Eds.). 1981. Multinationals from developing countries. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  39. Lall, S. 1983. The new multinationals: The spread of third world enterprises. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Liu, X., Buck, T., & Shu, C. 2005. Chinese economic development, the next stage: Outward FDI? International Business Review, 14: 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Madsen, T. K., & Servais, P. 1997. The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process? International Business Review, 6(6): 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magretta, J. 1998. Fast, global and entrepreneurial: Supply chain management, Hong Kong style. An interview with Victor Fung. Harvard Business Review, 76(5) (Sep–Oct): 102–114.Google Scholar
  43. Mathews 2002a. Dragon multinational: Towards a new model of global growth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mathews, J. A. 2002b. A resource-based view of Schumpeterian economic dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12: 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mathews, J. A. 2002c. Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4): 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mathews, J. A. 2003. Competitive dynamics and economic learning: An extended resource-based view. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(1): 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mathews, J. A. 2004. Catchup strategies and the latecomer effect: World industrial development in the 21st century. MGSM Working paper 2004–18. Sydney: Macquarie Graduate School of Management.Google Scholar
  48. Mathews, J. A. 2005. Strategy and the crystal cycle. California Management Review, 47(2): 6–32.Google Scholar
  49. Mathews, J. A. 2006. Strategizing, disequilibrium, and profit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mathews, J. A., & Snow, C. C. 1998. A conversation with The Acer Group's Stan Shih on global strategy and management. Organizational Dynamics, Summer.Google Scholar
  51. McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. 2000. International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 902–906.Google Scholar
  52. McDougall, P. P., Oviatt, B. M., & Shrader, R. C. 2003. A comparison of international and new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1: 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. 1994. Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9: 469–487.Google Scholar
  54. Melin, L. 1992. Internationalization as a strategy process. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2): 99–118.Google Scholar
  55. Miles, R. E., Miles, G., & Snow, C. C. 2005. Collaborative entrepreneurship: How communities of networked firms use continuous innovation to create economic wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  56. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. S., Mathews, J. A., Miles, G., & Coleman, H. J.1997. Organizing in the knowledge: Anticipating the cellular form. Academy of Management Executive, 11(4): 7–24.Google Scholar
  57. Narula, R., & Sadowski, B. 2002. Technological catch-up and strategic technology partnering in developing countries. International Journal of Technology Management, 23(6): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nolan, P., Sutherland, D., & Zhang, J. 2002. The challenge of the global business revolution. Contributions to Political Economy, 21: 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nolan, P., & Zhang, J. 2003. Globalization challenge for large firms from developing countries: China's oil and aerospace industries. European Management Journal, 21(3): 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1): 45–64.Google Scholar
  61. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1997. Challenges for internationalization process theory: The case of international new ventures. Management International Review, 37(2): 85–99.Google Scholar
  62. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 2005. Retrospective: The internationalization of entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 2–8.Google Scholar
  63. Peng, M. 2001. The Resource-Based View and International Business. Journal of Management, 27: 803–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peng, M. 2004. Identifying the big question in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Peng, M., & Wang, D. 2000. Innovation capability and foreign direct investment: Toward a learning option perspective. Management International Review, 40(1): 79–94.Google Scholar
  66. Perlmutter, H. 1969. The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business, 4 (Jan–Feb): 8–18.Google Scholar
  67. Pietrobelli, C., & Sverrison, A. (eds.). 2003. Linking local and global economies: The ties that bind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Rasmussen, E. S., Madsen, T. K., & Evangelista, F. 2001. The founding of the Born Global company in Denmark and Australia: Sensemaking and networking. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 13(3): 75–107.Google Scholar
  69. Rialp, A., Rialp, J., & Knight, G. A. 2005. The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry? International Business Review, 14: 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roberts, J., & Podolny, J, with J. Han., & A. Hodge (1999) ‘Cemex S. A. de C. V.: Global competition in local markets’, Stanford GSB case S–IB–17. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  71. Rugman, A. M. 1980. A new theory of the multinational enterprise: Internationalization versus internalization. Columbia Journal of World Business, Spring: 23–29.Google Scholar
  72. Rugman, A. M. 2003. Regional strategy and the demise of globalization. Journal of International Management, 9: 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shrader, R. C., Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 2000. How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (6): 1227–1247.Google Scholar
  75. Simon, H. 1996. Hidden champions: Lessons from 500 of the world's best unknown companies. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  76. Sinha, J. 2005. Global champions from emerging markets. McKinsey Quarterly, 2: 26–36.Google Scholar
  77. Sull, D. 1999. Spinning steel into gold: The case of Ispat International N. V. European Management Journal, (Aug).Google Scholar
  78. Turnbull, P. W. 1987. A challenge to the stages theory of the internationalization process. In P. J. Rosson and S. D. Reed (eds.), Managing export entry and expansion. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  79. UNCTAD 2004. World investment report 2004: The shift towards services. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
  80. Vernon, R. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The multinational spread of U. S. enterprises. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  81. Vernon-Wortzel, H., & Wortzel, L. H. 1988. Globalizing strategies for multinationals from developing countries. Columbia Journal of World Business, 23(1): 27–36.Google Scholar
  82. Weiss, L. (ed.). 2003. States in the global economy: Bringing domestic institutions back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. K. 1988. Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14(2): 34–55.Google Scholar
  84. Wells, L. T. 1983. Third world multinationals: The rise of foreign investment from developing countries. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  85. Wells, L. T. 1998. Multinationals and the developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1):101–114.Google Scholar
  86. World Bank 1993. The east Asian miracle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Yeung, H. 1999. The internationalization of ethnic Chinese business firms from Southeast Asia: Strategies, processes and competitive advantage. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(1): 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yeung, H. W. C (ed.). 2000. The globalization of business firms from emerging economies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  89. Zander, I. 1999. Whereto the multinational? The evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational network. International Business Review, 8: 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zander, I., & Zander, U. 1997. The oscillating multinational firm–-Alfa Laval in the period 1890–1990. In I. Bjorkman & M. Forsgren (eds.), The nature of the international firm. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business school Press.Google Scholar
  91. Zhang, Y.-J. 2003. China's emerging global businesses: Political economy and institutional investigations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie Graduate School of ManagementMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations