Abstract
The battery swap mode is a novel way of energy supplement for electric vehicles. Inevitably, there are some business transactions between battery swapping station (BSS) and battery centralized charging station (BCCS) in the mode. Therefore, it is essential to plan the construction of BSS and BCCS uniformly. Moreover, the needs of enterprises and users are not taken into account simultaneously in the existing site selection model. To resolve this problem, a many-objective joint site selection (MOJSS) model of BSS and BCCS is proposed in this paper. It mainly includes four objective functions: construction cost, coverage rate, investment income and satisfaction, which consider distance constraint between user demand points and the BSS, distance constraint between BBS and BSS, and the service ability constraint of BSS and the BCCS. To better solve the proposed model, a Grid-based evolutionary algorithm based on hybrid environment selection strategy is proposed. Furthermore, the segmented integer coding strategy and the specific genetic operation are designed based on the characteristic of model. It is compared with the existing many-objective evolutionary algorithms on standard test problems. Then the algorithm is applied to solve the established model. The experimental result demonstrated the reasonableness and effectiveness of proposed model. Finally, the site selection results are illustrated by a set of solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shi X, Zheng Y, Lei Y, Xue W, Yan G, Liu X, Cai B, Tong D, Wang J (2021) Air quality benefits of achieving carbon neutrality in China. Sci Total Environ 795:148784
Zhang X, Bai X (2017) Incentive policies from 2006 to 2016 and new energy vehicle adoption in 2010–2020 in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:24–43
Rietmann N, Lieven T (2019) How policy measures succeeded to promote electric mobility—worldwide review and outlook. J Clean Prod 206:66–75
Feng Y, Lu X (2021) Construction planning and operation of battery swapping stations for electric vehicles: a literature review. Energies 14(24):8202
Wu H (2021) A survey of battery swapping stations for electric vehicles: operation modes and decision scenarios. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst
Wu W, Lin B (2021) Benefits of electric vehicles integrating into power grid. Energy 224:120108
An K, Jing W, Kim I (2020) Battery-swapping facility planning for electric buses with local charging systems. Int J Sustain Transp 14(7):489–502
Gokalp O (2020) An iterated greedy algorithm for the obnoxious p-median problem. Eng Appl Artif Intell 92:103674
Albareda-Sambola M, Martínez-Merino LI, Rodríguez-Chía AM (2019) The stratified p-center problem. Comput Oper Res 108:213–225
Alizadeh R, Nishi T, Bagherinejad J, Bashiri M (2021) Multi-period maximal covering location problem with capacitated facilities and modules for natural disaster relief services. Appl Sci 11(1):397
Erdogan N, Pamucar D, Kucuksari S, Deveci M (2021) An integrated multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision-making model for optimal planning of workplace charging stations. Appl Energy 304:117866
Wang L, Qin Z, Slangen T, Bauer P, van Wijk T (2021) Grid impact of electric vehicle fast charging stations: trends, standards, issues and mitigation measures—an overview. IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics 2:56–74
Mao D, Tan J, Wang J (2020) Location planning of PEV fast charging station: an integrated approach under trafficand power grid requirements. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 22(1):483–492
Pal A, Bhattacharya A, Chakraborty AK (2021) Allocation of electric vehicle charging station considering uncertainties. Sust Energ Grids Netw 25(6):100422
Shaaban MF, Mohamed S, Ismail M, Qaraqe KA, Serpedin E (2019) Joint planning of smart EV charging stations and DGs in eco-friendly remote hybrid microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(5):5819–5830
Doolun IS, Ponnambalam SG, Subramanian N, Kanagaraj G (2018) Data driven hybrid evolutionary analytical approach for multi objective location allocation decisions: automotive green supply chain empirical evidence. Comput Oper Res 98:265–283
Arias A, Sanchez J, Granada M (2018) Integrated planning of electric vehicles routing and charging stations location considering transportation networks and power distribution systems. Int J Ind Eng Comput 9(4):535–550
Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Farnoosh A, Chen S, Li Y (2019) GIS-based multi-objective particle swarm optimization of charging stations for electric vehicles. Energy 169:844–853
Li Y, Zhang P, Wu Y (2018) Public recharging infrastructure location strategy for promoting electric vehicles: a bi-level programming approach. J Clean Prod 172:2720–2734
Zu S, Sun L (2022) Research on location planning of urban charging stations and battery-swapping stations for electric vehicles. Energy Rep 8:508–522
Wu X, Feng Q, Bai C, Lai CS, Jia Y, Lai LL (2021) A novel fast-charging stations locational planning model for electric bus transit system. Energy 224:120106
Chen R, Qian X, Miao L, Ukkusuri SV (2020) Optimal charging facility location and capacity for electric vehicles considering route choice and charging time equilibrium. Comput Oper Res 113:104776
Bai X, Chin KS, Zhou Z (2019) A bi-objective model for location planning of electric vehicle charging stations with GPS trajectory data. Comput Ind Eng 128:591–604
Zeng L, Krallmann T, Fiege A, Stess M, Graen T, Nolting M (2020) Optimization of future charging infrastructure for commercial electric vehicles using a multi-objective genetic algorithm and real travel data. Evol Syst 11(2):241–254
Pan L, Yao E, Yang Y, Zhang R (2020) A location model for electric vehicle (EV) public charging stations based on drivers’ existing activities. Sustain Cities Soc 59:102192
Yang J, Guo F, Zhang M (2017) Optimal planning of swapping/charging station network with customer satisfaction. Transp Res E: Logistics Trans Rev 103:174–197
Tian H et al (2018) The location optimization of electric vehicle charging stations considering charging behavior. Simulation-Trans Soc Model Simul Int 94(7):625–636
Guo F, Yang J, Lu J (2018) The battery charging station location problem: impact of users’ range anxiety and distance convenience. Transport Res E-Log 114:1–18
Kadri AA et al (2020) A multi-stage stochastic integer programming approach for locating electric vehicle charging stations. Comput Oper Res 117:19
Cai X, Geng S, Wu D et al (2020) A multicloud-model-based many-objective intelligent algorithm for efficient task scheduling in internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J 8(12):9645–9653
Cui Z, Zhang Z, Hu Z, Geng S, Chen J (2021) A many-objective optimization based intelligent high performance data processing model for cyber-physical-social systems. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Engi 9(6):3825–3834
Zhang Z, Cao Y, Cui Z, Zhang W, Chen J (2021) A many-objective optimization based intelligent intrusion detection algorithm for enhancing security of vehicular networks in 6G. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 70(6):5234–5243
Xu J, Zhang Z, Hu Z, du L, Cai X (2021) A many-objective optimized task allocation scheduling model in cloud computing. Appl Intell 51(6):3293–3310
Zheng Y, Zheng J (2022) A novel portfolio optimization model via combining multi-objective optimization and multi-attribute decision making. Appl Intell 52(5):5684–5695
Yuan J, Liu HL, Ong YS et al (2021) Indicator-based evolutionary algorithm for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput
Zhou J, Gao L, Li X, Zhang C, Hu C (2021) Hyperplane-driven and projection-assisted search for solving many-objective optimization problems. Inf Sci 574:394–412
Yang SX et al (2013) A grid-based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 17(5):721–736
Liu Y, Gong D, Sun X, Zhang Y (2017) Many-objective evolutionary optimization based on reference points. Appl Soft Comput 50:344–355
He Z, Yen GG (2016) Many-objective evolutionary algorithms based on coordinated selection strategy. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 21(2):220–233
Lin Q, Liu S, Zhu Q et al (2016) Particle swarm optimization with a balanceable fitness estimation for many-objective optimization problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 22(1):32–46
Pokojski W, Pokojska P (2018) Voronoi diagrams—inventor, method, applications. Pol Cartogr Rev 50(3):141–150
Deb K, Thiele L et al (2005) Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: theoretical advances and applications, pp 105–145
Bosman PAN, Thierens D (2003) The balance between proximity and diversity in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 7(2):174–188
Deb K, Jain H (2014) An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 18(4):577–601
Cheng R et al (2016) A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 20(5):773–791
Zhang XY et al (2015) A knee point-driven evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 19(6):761–776
Liang Y, Cai H, Zou G (2021) Configuration and system operation for battery swapping stations in Beijing. Energy 214:118883
Revankar SR, Kalkhambkar VN (2021) Grid integration of battery swapping station: a review. J Energy Storage 41:102937
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.61806138; Science and Technology Development Foundation of the Central Guiding Local under Grant No. YDZJSX2021A038; Key R&D program of Shanxi Province (International Cooperation) under Grant No. 201903D421048; Postgraduate Innovation Project of Shanxi Province under Grant No. 2021Y696; China University Industry-University-Research Collaborative Innovation Fund Grant No. 2021FNA04014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yongqiang He performs the experimental research and paper writing. Yanjun Zhang reviews grammar of the paper. Tian Fan revised and reviewed the whole paper. Xingjuan Cai and Yubin Xu provide guidance on topic selection of paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
He, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, T. et al. The charging station and swapping station site selection with many-objective evolutionary algorithm. Appl Intell 53, 18041–18060 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04292-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04292-8