Skip to main content
Log in

A generalized thresholding algorithm with dimension reduction for device-free localization in IoT

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Location information is one of the most important factors for many location-based services (LBSs) in the Internet of Things (IoT). Device-free localization (DFL) has received more attention as it achieves localization without attaching any electronic device to the target. DFL can be applied to many special scenarios, such as monitoring the elderly living alone, health care of inpatients, and emergency rescue. In applications based on traditional localization methods, the numerous receive signal strength (RSS) measurements are collected from wireless sensor networks (WSNs) comprised of sensor pairs to construct the atoms of learning dictionaries. With recovery algorithms, solutions can be obtained from undetermined equations using learning dictionaries, which can be mapped to the position index of the target to estimate the accurate coordinates. However, the numerous RSS data produced by WSN sensor generate high-dimensional learning dictionaries that cost the sparse recovery algorithm more iterative computation time to derive the target location and more space for data storage, thus affecting the real-time DFL performance. In this paper, we propose a data dimension reduction method based on the generalized iterative thresholding algorithm for DFL. Firstly, we reduced the column and row dimensions of the dictionary, respectively, via principal components analysis (PCA). Then, the dimension of the observed vector was reduced correspondingly. Finally, the new underdetermined equation was solved via sparse coding with an iterative p-thresholding algorithm in signal subspace, and the target location was estimated accurately. Experiments on public datasets demonstrated that the proposed method outperforms the current alternatives by improving the computation efficiency of DFL systems and taking less time to locate the target, implying its good applicability to IoT scenarios with high real-time requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors declare that all data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Pahlavan K, Krishnamurthy P, Geng Y (2015) Localization challenges for the emergence of the smart world. IEEE Access 3:3058–3067. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2508648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Youssef M, Mah M, Agrawala A (2007) Challenges: device-free passive localization for wireless environments. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on mobile computing and networking, pp 222–229

  3. Zhang D, Ma J, Chen Q, Ni L M (2007) An rf-based system for tracking transceiver-free objects. In: Fifth annual IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom’07), pp 135–144. IEEE

  4. Wilson J, Patwari N, Vasquez F G (2009) Regularization methods for radio tomographic imaging. In: 2009 Virginia tech symposium on wireless personal communications

  5. Zhao L, Huang H, Li X, Ding S (2019) An accurate and robust approach of device-free localization with convolutional autoencoder. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6 (3):5825–5840. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2907580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao L, Su C, Huang H, Han Z, Ding S, Li X (2019) Intrusion detection based on device-free localization in the era of iot. Symmetry 11(5):630. https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM11050630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Z, Xu Y, Yang J, Li X, Zhang D (2015) A survey of sparse representation: algorithms and applications. IEEE Access 3:490–530. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2430359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang D S, Guo X S, Zou Y X (2016) Accurate and robust device-free localization approach via sparse representation in presence of noise and outliers. In: 2016 IEEE International conference on digital signal processing (DSP), pp 199–203

  9. Li X, Ding S, Li Z, Tan B (2017) Device-free localization via dictionary learning with difference of convex programming. IEEE Sensors J 17(17):5599–5608. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2730226

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu T, Luo X, Liang Z (2018) Enhanced sparse representation-based device-free localization with radio tomography networks. J Sens Actuator Netw 7(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan7010007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang H, Zhao H, Li X, Ding S, Zhao L, Li Z (2018) An accurate and efficient device-free localization approach based on sparse coding in subspace. IEEE Access 6:61782–61799. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang H, Han Z, Ding S, Su C, Zhao L (2019) Improved sparse coding algorithm with device-free localization technique for intrusion detection and monitoring. Symmetry 11:637. https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM11050637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tropp J A, Gilbert A C (2007) Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 53(12):4655–4666. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2007.909108

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. J. C E (2006) Compressive sampling. In: Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians, vol 3, pp 1433–1452

  15. Daubechies I, Defrise M, De Mol C (2004) An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. Commun Pur Appl Math 57(11):1413–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/CPA.20042

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Beck A, Teboulle M (2009) A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J Imag Sci 2:183–202. https://doi.org/10.1137/080716542

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Selesnick I W (2009) Sparse signal restoration. Connexions, 1–13

  18. Huang H, Zhang C, Wu H, Dai Z, Zhao L, Su C (2021) An improving sparse coding algorithm for wireless passive target positioning. Phys Commun 49:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2021.101487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Han Z, Su C, Ding S, Huang H, Zhao L (2019) Device-free localization via sparse coding with log-regularizer. In: 2019 IEEE 10th international conference on awareness science and technology (iCAST), pp 1–6

  20. Zhao L, Huang H, Su C, Ding S, Huang H, Tan Z, Li Z (2021) Block-sparse coding-based machine learning approach for dependable device-free localization in iot environment. IEEE Internet Things J 8:3211–3223. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.3019732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Woodworth J, Chartrand R (2016) Compressed sensing recovery via nonconvex shrinkage penalties. Inverse Probl 32(7):075004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/32/7/075004

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chartrand R (2009) Fast algorithms for nonconvex compressive sensing: Mri reconstruction from very few data. In: 2009 IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, pp 262–265

  23. Chartrand R (2007) Exact reconstruction of sparse signals via nonconvex minimization. IEEE Signal Process Lett 14(10):707–710. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2007.898300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chartrand R, Staneva V (2008) Restricted isometry properties and nonconvex compressive sensing. Inverse Probl 24:035020. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/035020

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Voronin S, Chartrand R (2013) A new generalized thresholding algorithm for inverse problems with sparsity constraints. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, pp 1636–1640

  26. Cheng Q, Zhang L, Xue B, Shu F, Yu Y (2021) Device-free localization via sparse coding with a generalized thresholding algorithm. IEICE Trans Commun E105-B:1. https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.2021ebp3048

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson J, Patwari N (2010) Radio tomographic imaging with wireless networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 9(5):621–632. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2009.174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu J, An H, MT P M, Cui Z, Zhao S (2017) Redundancy reduction for indoor device-free localization. Pers Ubiquit Comput 21(1):5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0979-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li X, Ding S, Li Y (2017) Outlier suppression via non-convex robust pca for efficient localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors J 17(21):7053–7063. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2754502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang J, Zhang X, Gao Q, Ma X, Feng X, Wang H (2016) Device-free simultaneous wireless localization and activity recognition with wavelet feature. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(2):1659–1669. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2555986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shi S, Sigg S, Chen L, Ji Y (2018) Accurate location tracking from csi-based passive device-free probabilistic fingerprinting. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 67(6):5217–5230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2810307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wright J, Yang A Y, Ganesh A, Sastry S S, Ma Y (2008) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(2):210–227. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cevher V, Duarte M F, Baraniuk R G (2008) Distributed target localization via spatial sparsity. In: 2008 16th European signal processing conference, pp 1–5

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61771258, the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province under Grants KYCX20_0732, KYCX21_0749, and KYCX20_0739, and the Open Research Fund of Key Lab of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network Technology (Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications), Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linghua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

There are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Q., Zhang, L., Xue, B. et al. A generalized thresholding algorithm with dimension reduction for device-free localization in IoT. Appl Intell 53, 9089–9102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03925-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03925-2

Keywords

Navigation