Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A symmetric neural cryptographic key generation scheme for Iot security

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of CMOS technology to generate neural session keys is presented in this research for incorporation with the Internet of Things (IoT) to improve security. Emerging technology advancements in the IoT era have enabled better tactics to exacerbate energy efficiency and security difficulties. Current safety solutions do not effectively address the security of IoT. Regarding IoT integration, a tiny logic area ASIC design of a re-keying enabled Triple Layer Vector-Valued Neural Network (TLVVNN) is presented utilizing CMOS designs with measurements of 65 and 130 nanometers. There hasn’t been much study into optimizing the value of neural weights for faster neural synchronization. Harris’ Hawks is used in this instance to optimize the neural network’s weight vector for faster coordination. Once this process is completed, the synchronized weight becomes the session key. This method offers several advantages, namely (1) production of the session key by mutual neural synchronization over the public channel is one of the advantages of this technology. (2) It facilitates Hawks-based neural weight vector optimization for faster neural synchronization across public channels. (3) As per behavioral modeling, the synchronization duration might be reduced from 1.25 ms to less than 0.7 ms for a 20% weight imbalance in the re-keying phase. (4) Geometric, brute force, and majority attacks are all prohibited. Experiments to validate the suggested method’s functionality are carried out, and the results show that the proposed approach outperforms current similar techniques in terms of efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perrig A (1999) Efficient collaborative key management protocols for secure autonomous group communication. In: International workshop on cryptographic techniques and electronic commerce. University of Hong Kong Press, pp 192–202

  2. Boyd C, Mathuria A (2013) Protocols for authentication and key establishment Springer books

  3. Dolecki M, Kozera R (2015) The impact of the TPM weights distribution on network synchronization time. In: Computerinformation systems and industrial management. Springer international publishing, vol 9339. pp 451–460

  4. Dong T, Huang T (2020) Neural cryptography based on complex-valued neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 31(11):4999–5004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu X, Zhao Y, Yang J (2012) Reducing rekeying time using an integrated group key agreement scheme. J Commun Netw 14(4):418–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Huiling C (2019) Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingemarsson I, Tang D, Wong C (1982) A conference key distribution system. IEEE Trans:714–720

  8. Jarecki S, Kim J, Tsudik G (2011) Flexible robust group key agreement. IEEE Trans Parallel DistribSyst 22(5):879–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong Sooyong, Park Cheolhee, Hong Dowon, Seo Changho, Jho Namsu (2021) Neural cryptography based on generalized tree parity machine for real-life systems. Secur Commun Netw, 2021

  10. Joux A (2000) A one round protocol for tripartite Diffie -Hellman” algorithmic number theory. 4th International Symposium ANTS-IV 1838:385–393

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Karakaya B, Gülten A, Frasca M (2019) A true random bit generator based on a Memristive chaotic circuit analysis, design and FPGA implementation. Chaos Solit Fractals 119:143–149

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelsey J, Schneier B, Wagner D, Hall C (1998) Cryptanalytic attacks on pseudorandom number generators. Fast Software Encryption:168–188

  13. Kim Y, Tsudik G (2000) Simple and fault tolerant key agreement for dynamic collaborative groups. 7th ACM Conf Comput Com Sec ACM Press:235–244

  14. Konstantinou E (2013) An efficient constant round id-based group key agreement protocol for Ad hoc networks”. In: and others, editor, Proc of NSS 2013, vol 7873. of LNCS, pp 563– 574

  15. Kumar A (2019) An enhanced quantum key distribution protocol for security authentication. J Discret Math Sci Cryptogr 22:499–507

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu L, Miao S, Hu H, Deng Y (2016) Pseudo-random bit generator based on non-stationary logistic maps. IET Inf Secur 10:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu P, Zeng Z, Wang J (2019) Global synchronization of coupled fractional-order recurrent neural networks. EEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 30(8):2358–2368

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mühlbach S, Wallner S (2008) Secure communication in microcomputer bus systems for embedded devices. J Syst Archit 54(11):1065–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. NIST (2020) NIST Statistical Test

  20. Patidar V, Sud KK, Pareek NK (2009) A pseudo random bit generator based on chaotic logistic map and its statistical testing. Informatica 33:441–452

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarkar A. (2021) Deep learning guided double hidden layer neural synchronization through mutual learning. Neural Process Lett 53:1355–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarkar A, Khan MZ, Noorwali A (2021) CMOS technology-based energy efficient artificial neural session key synchronization for securing IoT. Comput Electr Eng 95:107369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shacham LN, Klein E, Mislovaty R, Kanter I, Kinzel W (2004) Cooperating attackers in neural cryptography. Physical Review E, vol 69(6)

  24. Steiner M, Tsudik G, Waidner M (1996) Diffie-hellman key distribution extended to group communication. 3rd ACM ACM Conf Comput Commun Secur ACM press:31–37

  25. Steiner M, Tsudik G, Waidner M (2000) Key agreement in dynamic peer groups. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 11(8):769–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Teodoro AAM, Gomes OSM, Saadi M et al (2021) An FPGA-based performance evaluation of artificial neural network architecture algorithm for IoT. Wirel Pers Commun

  27. Volkmer M, Wallner S (2005) Tree parity machine rekeying architectures. IEEE Trans Comput 54(4):421–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu Q, Mu Y, Susilo W, Qin B, Domingo-Ferrer J (2009) Asymmetric group key agreement”. In: Iand others, editor, Proc of Eurocrypt ’09, vol 5479. of LNCS, pp 153–70

  29. Zhang L, Wu Q, Qin B, Domingo-Ferrer J (2011) Provably secure one-round identity-based authenticated asymmetric group key agreement protocol”. Inf Sci 181(19):4318–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expressed deep gratitude for the moral and congenial atmosphere support provided by the Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira, Belur Math, India through the DBT STAR college scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Electronics, Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira, Belur Math, Howrah, 711202, West Bengal, India

    Arindam Sarkar

Authors
  1. Arindam Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arindam Sarkar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

No conflict of Interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarkar, A. A symmetric neural cryptographic key generation scheme for Iot security. Appl Intell 53, 9344–9367 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03904-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03904-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation