Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autonomous and connected intersection crossing traffic management using discrete-time occupancies trajectory

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problem of safe and efficient intersection crossing traffic management of autonomous and connected ground traffic. Toward this objective, we propose an algorithm called the discrete-time occupancies trajectory based intersection traffic coordination algorithm (DICA). We show that the basic DICA has a computational complexity of \(\mathcal {O}(n^{2} {L_{m}^{3}})\) where n is the number of vehicles granted to cross an intersection and Lm is the maximum length of intersection crossing routes. To improve the overall computational efficiency of the algorithm, the basic DICA is enhanced by several computational approaches that are proposed in this paper. The enhanced algorithm has the computational complexity of \(\mathcal {O}(n^{2} L_{m} \log _{2} L_{m})\). The improved computational efficiency of the enhanced algorithm is validated through simulations using an open source traffic simulator called the simulation of urban mobility (SUMO). The overall throughput, as well as the computational efficiency of the enhanced algorithm, are also compared with those of an optimized traffic light control algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azimi S, Bhatia G, Rajkumar R, Mudalige P (2013) Reliable intersection protocols using vehicular networks. In: 2013 ACM/IEEE international conference on cyber-physical systems (ICCPS). IEEE, pp 1–10

  2. Bengler K, Dietmayer K, Farber B, Maurer M, Stiller C, Winner H (2014) Three decades of driver assistance systems: review and future perspectives. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag 6(4):6–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Board TR (2000) Highway capacity manual. National Academy of Sciences, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC

  4. Carlino D, Boyles SD, Stone P (2013) Auction-based autonomous intersection management. In: 16th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC 2013). IEEE, pp 529–534

  5. Cheng D, Tian ZZ, Messer CJ (2005) Development of an improved cycle length model over the highway capacity manual 2000 quick estimation method. J Transport Eng 131(12):890–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombo A, Del Vecchio D (2012) Efficient algorithms for collision avoidance at intersections. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on hybrid systems: computation and control. ACM, pp 145–154

  7. DARPA: The darpa urban challenge (2007). http://archive.darpa.mil/grandchallenge/

  8. Dresner K, Stone P (2008) A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. J Artif Intell Res 31:591–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guler SI, Menendez M, Meier L (2014) Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 46:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horowitz R, Varaiya P (2000) Control design of an automated highway system. Proc IEEE 88(7):913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jin Q, Wu G, Boriboonsomsin K, Barth M (2012) Advanced intersection management for connected vehicles using a multi-agent systems approach. In: 2012 IEEE on intelligent vehicles symposium (IV). IEEE, pp 932–937

  12. Kim KD, Kumar PR (2014) An mpc-based approach to provable system-wide safety and liveness of autonomous ground traffic. IEEE Trans Autom Control 59(12):3341–3356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Krajzewicz D, Erdmann J, Behrisch M, Bieker L (2012) Recent development and applications of sumo–simulation of urban mobility. Int J Adv Syst Measur, 5(3&4)

  14. Lee J, Park B (2012) Development and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle intersection control algorithm under the connected vehicles environment. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 13(1):81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li DP, Liu YJ, Tong S, Chen CP, Li DJ (2018) Neural networks-based adaptive control for nonlinear state constrained systems with input delay. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics

  16. Liu L, Liu YJ, Tong S (2018) Neural networks-based adaptive finite-time fault-tolerant control for a class of strict-feedback switched nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics

  17. Liu YJ, Gong M, Tong S, Chen CP, Li DJ (2018) Adaptive fuzzy output feedback control for a class of nonlinear systems with full state constraints. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

  18. Liu YJ, Lu S, Tong S, Chen X, Chen CP, Li DJ (2018) Adaptive control-based barrier lyapunov functions for a class of stochastic nonlinear systems with full state constraints. Automatica 87:83–93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu Q, Kim KD (2016) Intelligent intersection management of autonomous traffic using discrete-time occupancies trajectory. J Traffic Logist Eng 4(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malikopoulos AA, Cassandras CG (2016) Decentralized optimal control for connected and automated vehicles at an intersection. arXiv:1602.03786

  21. Markoff J (2010) Google cars drive themselves, in traffic. New York Times 10(A1):9

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miculescu D, Karaman S (2016) Polling-systems-based autonomous vehicle coordination in traffic intersections with no traffic signals. arXiv:1607.07896

  23. Neto FDN, de Souza Baptista C, Campelo CE (2018) Combining Markov model and prediction by partial matching compression technique for route and destination prediction. Knowl-Based Syst 154:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Onieva E, Hernández-Jayo U, Osaba E, Perallos A, Zhang X (2015) A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for the tuning of fuzzy rule bases for uncoordinated intersections in autonomous driving. Inform Sci 321:14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tientrakool P, Ho YC, Maxemchuk NF (2011) Highway capacity benefits from using vehicle-to-vehicle communication and sensors for collision avoidance. In: 2011 IEEE on vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall). IEEE, pp 1–5

  26. Vasirani M, Ossowski S (2012) A market-inspired approach for intersection management in urban road traffic networks. J Artif Intell Res 43:621–659

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang P, Li W, Li C, Hou Y (2018) Action recognition based on joint trajectory maps with convolutional neural networks. Knowledge-Based Systems

  28. Wu J, Abbas-Turki A, El Moudni A (2012) Cooperative driving: an ant colony system for autonomous intersection management. Appl Intell 37(2):207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wuthishuwong C, Traechtler A, Bruns T (2015) Safe trajectory planning for autonomous intersection management by using vehicle to infrastructure communication. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2015(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyoung-Dae Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Q., Kim, KD. Autonomous and connected intersection crossing traffic management using discrete-time occupancies trajectory. Appl Intell 49, 1621–1635 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1357-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1357-1

Keywords

Navigation