Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On minimizing coding operations in network coding based multicast: an evolutionary algorithm

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In telecommunications networks, to enable a valid data transmission based on network coding, any intermediate node within a given network is allowed, if necessary, to perform coding operations. The more coding operations needed, the more coding resources consumed and thus the more computational overhead and transmission delay incurred. This paper investigates an efficient evolutionary algorithm to minimize the amount of coding operations required in network coding based multicast. Based on genetic algorithms, we adapt two extensions in the proposed evolutionary algorithm, namely a new crossover operator and a neighbourhood search operator, to effectively solve the highly complex problem being concerned. The new crossover is based on logic OR operations to each pair of selected parent individuals, and the resulting offspring are more likely to become feasible. The aim of this operator is to intensify the search in regions with plenty of feasible individuals. The neighbourhood search consists of two moves which are based on greedy link removal and path reconstruction, respectively. Due to the specific problem feature, it is possible that each feasible individual corresponds to a number of, rather than a single, valid network coding based routing subgraphs. The neighbourhood search is applied to each feasible individual to find a better routing subgraph that consumes less coding resource. This operator not only improves solution quality but also accelerates the convergence. Experiments have been carried out on a number of fixed and randomly generated benchmark networks. The results demonstrate that with the two extensions, our evolutionary algorithm is effective and outperforms a number of state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of the ability of finding optimal solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Miller CK (1998) Multicast networking and applications. Pearson Education

  2. Xu Y, Qu R (2012) A hybrid scatter search meta-heuristic for delay-constrained multicast routing problems. Appl Intell 36:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jahanshahi M, Dehghan M, Meybodi MR (2013) LAMR: learning automata based multicast routing protocol for multi-channel multi-radio wireless mesh networks. Appl Intell 38:58–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahlswede R, Cai N, Li SYR, Yeung RW (2000) Network information flow. IEEE T Inform Theory 46(4):1204–1216

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Li SYR, Yeung RW, Cai N (2003) Linear network coding. IEEE T Inform Theory 49(2):371–381

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Noguchi T, Matsuda T, Yamamoto M (2003) Performance evaluation of new multicast architecture with network coding. IEICE T Commun E86-B: 1788–1795

  7. Wu Y, Chou PA, Kung SY (2005) Minimum-energy multicast in mobile ad hoc networks using network coding. IEEE T Commun 53(11):1906–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fragouli C, Boudec JYL, Widmer J (2006) Network coding: an instant primer. Comput Commun Rev 36:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim M, Ahn CW, Médard M, Effros M (2006) On minimizing network coding resources: An evolutionary approach. In: Proceedings of Second Workshop on Network Coding, Theory, and Applications. NetCod2006, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim M, Médard M, Aggarwal V, Reilly VO, Kim W, Ahn CW, Effros M (2007) Evolutionary approaches to minimizing network coding resources. In: Proceedings of 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM2007). Anchorage, pp 1991–1999

  11. Kim M, Aggarwal V, Reilly VO, Médard M, Kim W (2007) Genetic representations for evolutionary optimization of network coding. In: Proceedings of EvoWorkshops 2007, LNCS 4448. Valencia, pp 21–31

  12. Mitchell M (1996) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press

  13. Krasnogor N, Smith JE (2005) A tutorial for competent memetic algorithms: model, taxonomy and design issues. IEEE T Evolut Comput:474–488

  14. Qu R, Burke EK, McCollum B, Merlot LTG, Lee SY (2009) A survey of search methodologies and automated system development for examination timetabling. J Sched 12:58–89

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Xing H, Ji Y, Bai L, Sun Y (2010) An improved quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for coding resource optimization based network coding multicast scheme. AEU-Int J Electron C 64 (12):1105–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Langberg M, Sprintson A, Bruck J (2006) The encoding complexity of network coding. IEEE T Inform Theory 52 (6):2386–2397

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Koetter R, Médard M (2003) An algebraic approach to network coding. IEEE ACM T Network 11 (5):782–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho T, Koetter R, Médard M, Karger DR, Effros M (2003) The benefits of coding over routing in a randomized setting. In: Proceedings of 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. Yokohama, Japan, pp 442-442

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jaggi S, Sanders P, Chou PA, Effros M, Egner S, Jain K, Tolhuizen L. (2005) Polynomial time algorithms for multicast network code construction. IEEE T Inform Theory 51:1973–1982

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Fong SL, Yeung RW (2010) Variable-rate linear network coding. IEEE T Inform Theory 56:2618–2625

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Fragouli C., Soljanin E. (2006) Information flow decomposition for network coding. IEEE T Inform Theory 52:829–848

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Xing H, Qu R, Kendall G, Bai R (2013) A path-oriented encoding evolutionary algorithm for network coding resource minimization. J Oper Res Soc: 1–17. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.79.

  23. Ji Y, Xing H (2011) A memory-storable quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for network coding resource minimization. In: Kita E (ed) Algorithm, Evolutionary. InTech, pp 363-380

  24. Xing H, Qu R (2011) A population based incremental learning for network coding resources minimization. IEEE Commun Lett 15:698–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xing H, Qu R (2011) A population based incremental learning for delay constrained network coding resource minimization. In: Proceedings of EvoApplications 2011. Torino, pp 51–60

  26. Xing H, Qu R (2012) A compact genetic algorithm for the network coding based resource minimization problem. Appl Intell 36:809–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahn CW (2011) Fast and adaptive evolutionary algorithm for minimum-cost multicast with network coding. Electron Lett 47(12):700–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luong HN, Nguyen H TT, Ahn CW (2012) Entropy-based efficiency enhancement techniques for evolutionary algorithms. Inform Sci 188:100–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xing H, Qu R (2013) A nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for bi-objective network coding based multicast routing problems. Iinform Sci 233:36–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldberg A V (1985) A new max-flow algorithm. MIT Technical Report MIT/LCS/TM-291, Laboratory for Computer Science

  31. Walpole R E, Myers R H, Myers S L, Ye K (2007) Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. Pearson Education

  32. Dijkstra E W (1959) A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numer Math 1:267–271

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaur M, Kumar A (2013) Method for solving unbalanced fully fuzzy multi-objective solid minimal cost flow problems. Appl Intell 38:239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lwin K, Qu R (2013) A hybrid algorithm for constrained portfolio selection problems. Appl Intell 39:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng Y J, Chen S Y (2013) Cooperative particle swarm optimization for multiobjective transportation planning. Appl Intell 39:202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsakonas A (2014) An analysis of accuracy-diversity trade-off for hybrid combined system with multiobjective predictor selection. Appl Intell. doi:10.1007/s10489-013-0507-8.. published online

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSFC (No. 6117 1103, No.61372118), Doctoral Fund of MOE (No.20120005130001), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LQ13F 030011), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2682014RC23), the China Scholarship Council (CSC), P.R.China, and University of Nottingham, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huanlai Xing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xing, H., Qu, R., Bai, L. et al. On minimizing coding operations in network coding based multicast: an evolutionary algorithm. Appl Intell 41, 820–836 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0559-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0559-4

Keywords

Navigation