Applied Intelligence

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 308–319 | Cite as

Case learning for CBR-based collision avoidance systems

  • Yuhong Liu
  • Chunsheng Yang
  • Yubin Yang
  • Fuhua Lin
  • Xuanmin Du
  • Takayuki Ito
Article

Abstract

With the rapid development of case-based reasoning (CBR) techniques, CBR has been widely applied to real-world applications such as collision avoidance systems. A successful CBR-based system relies on a high-quality case base, and a case creation technique for generating such a case base is highly required. In this paper, we propose an automated case learning method for CBR-based collision avoidance systems. Building on techniques from CBR and natural language processing, we developed a methodology for learning cases from maritime affair records. After giving an overview on the developed systems, we present the methodology and the experiments conducted in case creation and case evaluation. The experimental results demonstrated the usefulness and applicability of the case learning approach for generating cases from the historic maritime affair records.

Keywords

Case-based reasoning Ship collision avoidance Maritime affair records Case learning Case base management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sato Y, Ishii H (1998) Study of collision-avoidance system for ships. Control Eng Pract 6:1141–1149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Y, Yang W (2004) The structure design of an intelligent decision support system for navigation collision avoidance. In: IEEE third international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, vol 1, pp 302–307 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu Y (1999) A design and study on intelligence collision prevention expert system for navigation. PhD Thesis, Harbin Engineering University, China Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang C (1995) An expert system for collision avoidance and its application. PhD Thesis, Hiroshima University, Japan Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang CH (2002) The integrated design of fuzzy collision avoidance and H -autopilots on ships. J Navig 55(1):117–136 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu Y, Du X, Yang S (2006) The design of a fuzzy-neural network for ship collision avoidance. In: ICMLC 2005. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3930, pp 804–812 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao J, Wang F (1997) The collision regulations and cases. Dalian Maritime University Press, pp 560–685 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shiu SCK, Pal SK (2004) Case-based reasoning: concepts, features and soft computing. Int J Appl Intell 21(3):233–238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Policastro CA, Carvalho ACPLF, Delbem ACB (2008) A hybrid case adaptation approach for case-based reasoning. Int J Appl Intell 28(2):101–119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu Y, Wen M, Du Z (2009) A case learning model for ship collision avoidance based on automatic text analysis. In: The proceedings of IEEE the fifth international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, July 2009, Baoding, China Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu Y, Yang C, Du X (2008) Multi-agent planning for ship collision avoidance. In: The proceedings of IEEE international conferences on cybernetics & intelligent systems (CIS) and robotics, automation & mechatronics (RAM) (CIS-RAM 2008), Chengdu, China, June, 2008 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu Y, Yang C, Du X (2008) A CBR-based approach for ship collision avoidance. In: The proceedings of the 21st international conference on industrial & engineering applications of artificial intelligence & expert systems (IEA/AIE-2008), Wroclaw, Poland, June 2008 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park M, Lee KK, Shon KM, Yoon WC (2001) Automating the diagnosis and rectification of deflection Yoke production using hybrid knowledge acquisition and case-based reasoning. Int J Appl Intell 15(1):25–40 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Féret MP, Glasgow JI (1997) Combining case-based and model-based reasoning for the diagnosis of complex devices. Int J Appl Intell 7(1):57–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leake DB, Wilson DC (2001) A case-based framework for interactive capture and reuse of design knowledge. Int J Appl Intell 14(1):77–94 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kravis S, Irrgang R (2005) A case based system for oil and gas well design with risk assessment. Int J Appl Intell 23(1):39–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Avesani P, Perini A, Ricci F (2000) Interactive case-based planning for forest fire management. Int J Appl Intell 13(1):41–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim K (2000) Toward global optimization of case-based reasoning systems for financial forecasting. Int J Appl Intell 21(3):239–249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bichindaritz I, Montani S, Portinale L (2007) Special issue on case-based reasoning in the health sciences, Int J Appl Intell 28(3) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watson I, Marir F (1994) Case-base reasoning: a review, Knowl Eng Rev 9(4) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang C, Orchard B, Farley B, Zaluski M (2003) Automated case base creation and management. In: The proceedings of international conference on industrial & engineering. Applications of artificial intelligence & expert system (IEA/AIE-2003) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Therani M, Zhao J, Marshall B (2004) A case-based reasoning framework for workflow model management. Data Knowl Eng 50:87–115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Avesani P, Ferrari S, Susi A (2003) Case-based ranking for decision support systems. In: ICCBR 2003. LNAI, vol 2689, pp 35–49 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McSherry D (2003) Similarity and compromise. In: ICCBR 2003. LNAI, vol 2689, pp 291–305 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nordlund J, Schafer H (2006) Case-based reasoning in a support system. Master’s Thesis, UMEA University, Sweden Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang C, Farley B, Orchard B (2008) Automated case creation and management for diagnostic CBR systems. Int J Appl Intell 28(1):17–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Labrou Y (2001) Standardizing agent communication. Multi-agents systems and applications. In: Lecture notes in computer science, pp 74-9 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rao AS, Georgeff MP (1991) Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: The proceedings of the 2nd international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, pp 473–484 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gong H, Gong C, Zhou C (2004) Chinese word segmentation system research. J Beijing Inst Mach 19(3):52–61 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qiu J, Wen T, Zhou L (2005) Research of Chinese automatic segmentation and content analysis method. J China Soc Sci Tech Inf 24(3):309–317 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    China MSA (Maritime Safety Administration) (2007) Typical water traffic accident cases. China Communications Press, pp 1–89 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Buzek EJ, Holder HMC (1984) Collision cases judgments and diagrams. Lloyd’s of London Press Ltd Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu Y, Liu H (2006) Case learning based on evaluation system for vessel collision avoidance. In: The proceedings of IEEE the fifth international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, vol 4, pp 2064–2069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu Y, Hu S (2005) An evaluation system for single-target ship collision avoidance based on data fusion. Navig China 65(4):40–45 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuhong Liu
    • 1
  • Chunsheng Yang
    • 2
  • Yubin Yang
    • 3
  • Fuhua Lin
    • 4
  • Xuanmin Du
    • 5
  • Takayuki Ito
    • 6
  1. 1.Shanghai Aerospace Electronic Technology InstituteShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Institute for Information TechnologyNational Research Council CanadaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory for Novel Software TechnologyNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  4. 4.Athabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada
  5. 5.Shanghai Marine Electronic Equipment Research InstituteShanghaiChina
  6. 6.Nagoya Institute of TechnologyNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations