Skip to main content
Log in

Rainfall-runoff modeling of flash floods in the absence of rainfall forecasts: the case of “Cévenol flash floods”

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Cévenol flash floods” are famous in the field of hydrology, because they are archetypical of flash floods that occur in populated areas, thereby causing heavy damages and casualties. As a consequence, their prediction has become a stimulating challenge to designers of mathematical models, whether physics based or machine learning based. Because current, state-of-the-art hydrological models have difficulty performing forecasts in the absence of rainfall previsions, new approaches are necessary. In the present paper, we show that an appropriate model selection methodology, applied to neural network models, provides reliable two-hour ahead flood forecasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oudin L, Hervieu F, Michel C, Perrin C, Andréassian V, Anctil F, Loumagne C (2005) Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model? Part 2: toward a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall-runoff modelling. J Hydrol 303:290–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Lay M, Saulnier G-M (2007) Exploring the signature of climate and landscape spatial variabilities in flash flood events: case of the 8–9 September 2002 Cévennes-Vivarais catastrophic event. Geophys Res Lett 34:L13401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouvier C, Ayral P-A, Brunet P, Crespy A, Marchandise A Martin C (2006) Recent advances in rainfall-runoff modelling: extrapolation to extreme floods in Southern France. In: International workshop on hydrological extremes. Observing and modelling exceptional floods and rainfalls rende (CS), 3–4 May 2006

  4. Estupina-Borrell V, Chorda J, Dartus D (2005) Flash-flood anticipation. CR Geosci 337:1109–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouttier F (2003) The Arome mesoscale project. In: Proceedings of the ECMWF, September 2003

  6. Delrieu G, Ducrocq V, Gaume E, Nicol J, Payrastre O, Yates E, Kirstetter P, Andrieu H, Ayral P, Bouvier C, Creutin J, Livet M, Anquetin S, Lang M, Neppel L, Obled C, Parent-du-Chatelet J, Saulnier G-M, Walpersdorf A, Wobrock W (2004) The catastrophic flash-flood of 8–9 September 2002 in the Gard region, France: a first case study for the Cévennes-Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological Observatory. J Hydrometeorol 6:34–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaume E, Livet M, Desbordes M, Villeneuve J-P (2004) Hydrological analysis of the river Aude, France, flash flood on 12 and 13 November 1999. J Hydrol 286:135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sauvagnargues-Lesage S, Ayral P-A (2007) Using GIS for emergency management—a case study during the 2002 and 2003 South East flooding in France. Int J Emerg Manag 4(4):682–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Piotrowski A, Napiorkowski J-J, Rowinski P-M (2006) Flash flood forecasting by means of neural networks and nearest neighbour approach—a comparative study. Nonlinear Process Geophys 13:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Rasmussen P, Bobée B (2000) A recurrent neural networks approach using indices of low frequency climatic variability to forecast regional annual runoff. Hydrol Process 14:2755–2777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Bobée B (2000) Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. J Hydrol 230:244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahoo G-B, Ray C (2006) Flow forecasting for a Hawaii stream using rating curves and neural networks. J Hydrol 317:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahoo GB, Ray C, de Carlo E-H (2006) Use of neural networks to predict flash flood and attendant water qualities of a mountainous stream on Oahu, Hawaii. J Hydrol 327:525–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmitz G-H, Cullmann J (2008) PAI-OFF: a new proposal for online flood forecasting in flash flood prone catchments. J Hydrol 360:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giustolisi O, Laucelli D (2005) Improving generalization of artificial neural networks in rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrol Sci J 50:439–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nerrand O, Urbani D, Roussel-Ragot P, Personnaz L, Dreyfus G (1994) Training recurrent neural networks: why and how? An illustration in process modeling. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noilhan J, Mahfouf J-F (1996) The ISBA land surface parameterisation scheme. Glob Planet Change 13:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dreyfus G (2005) Neural networks, methodology and applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kitadinis P-K, Bras R-L (1980) Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 2 applications and results. Water Resour Res 16:1034–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qu H-n, Oussar Y, Dreyfus G, W Xu (2009) Regularized recurrent least squares support vector machines. In: International joint conference on bioinformatics, systems biology and intelligent computing, Shanghai

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Johannet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toukourou, M., Johannet, A., Dreyfus, G. et al. Rainfall-runoff modeling of flash floods in the absence of rainfall forecasts: the case of “Cévenol flash floods”. Appl Intell 35, 178–189 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-010-0210-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-010-0210-y

Keywords

Navigation