Abstract
There are great and growing behavioral needs in the United States. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) already invests in many lines of research and services to address those needs. But there are opportunities for other federal agencies to provide investments as well. All federal agencies are now required to develop evidence-building plans, called Learning Agendas, per the Evidence-Based Policy Making Act. This commentary reviews the content of 2022–2026 Learning Agendas for priorities related to behavioral health across all U.S. federal agencies besides HHS. Across 4 other federal agencies and 2 cross-government plans, there are Learning Agenda priorities related to behavioral health. These priorities cover examining ways to expand access to mental health and substance use disorder treatment to veterans, Medicaid beneficiaries, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex individuals; and improving the social and emotional well-being of school children, veterans with disabilities, and veterans with military sexual trauma. Some important developing areas were not mentioned in any of the Learning Agendas, which are worth considering. These areas include new digital technologies and artificial intelligence for behavioral health, psychotropic agents, and the strong link between physical and mental health. To meet the behavioral health needs of the country, there are opportunities for inter-agency collaboration at the federal level to build evidence and incorporate new, important developments in behavioral health.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bridge, J. A., Ruch, D. A., Sheftall, A. H., Hahm, H. C., O’Keefe, V. M., Fontanella, C. A., & Horowitz, L. M. (2023). Youth Suicide during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatrics, 151(3), e2022058375.
U.S. Government (2023). Evidence Plans. U.S. Government. Retrieved August 28 from https://www.evaluation.gov/evidence-plans/learning-agenda/.
Haidt, J., & Lukianoff, G. (2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Books.
Hamilton, L., & Gross, B. (2021). How Has the Pandemic Affected Students’ Social-Emotional Well-Being? A Review of the Evidence to Date. C. o. R. P. Education.
Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46–60.
Mojtabai, R., & Olfson, M. (2020). National trends in mental health care for US adolescents. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(7), 703–714.
National Academies of Sciences, Medicine, E. (2018). Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs mental health services (0309466601 vol.). N. A. Press.
Nichols, D. E., Johnson, M. W., & Nichols, C. D. (2017). Psychedelics as medicines: An emerging new paradigm. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 101(2), 209–219.
Singh, B., Olds, T., Curtis, R., Dumuid, D., Virgara, R., Watson, A., & Eglitis, E. (2023). Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for improving depression, anxiety and distress: An overview of systematic reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-106195.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2023). SAMHSA Seeks $10.8 Billion in Fiscal Year 2024 to Bolster Mental Health and Substance Use Services Across the Nation. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved September 1 from https://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/20230313/seeking-funding-fy-2024-bolster-mental-health-substance-use-services.
Tsai, J., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2016). US Veterans’ use of VA mental health services and disability compensation increased from 2001 to 2010. Health Affairs, 35(6), 966–973.
Funding
There was no specific funding for this work. The author’s research is supported by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and by the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The author reports no conflicts of interest with this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsai, J. Beyond the Usual Players: Evidence-Building Priorities for Behavioral Health Among all U.S. Federal Agencies. Adm Policy Ment Health 51, 14–16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-023-01313-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-023-01313-7