Skip to main content
Log in

A Structural Model of Organization and Clinician Factors Associated with Standardized Measure Use in a National Survey of Youth Mental Health Providers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standardized assessment measures are important for accurate diagnosis of mental health problems and for treatment planning and evaluation. However, little is known about youth mental health providers’ typical use of standardized measures across disciplines and outside the context of evidence-based practice initiatives. A multidisciplinary national survey examined the frequency with which 674 youth mental health providers administer standardized and unstandardized measures, and the extent to which organizational (i.e., implementation climate, rigid hierarchical organizational structure) and provider (i.e., attitudes toward standardized assessment measures, highest degree, practice setting) characteristics are associated with standardized measure use. Providers used unstandardized measures far more frequently than standardized measures. Providers’ perceptions (a) that standardized measures are practical or feasible, (b) that their organization supports and values evidence-based practices, and (c) that their organization has a rigid hierarchical structure predicted greater use of standardized measures. Working in schools predicted less frequent SMU, while working in higher education and other professional settings predicted more frequent SMU. Standardized measures were not routinely used in this community-based sample. A rigid hierarchical organizational structure may be conducive to more frequent administration of standardized measures, but it is unclear whether such providers actually utilize these measures for clinical decision-making. Alternative strategies to promote standardized measure use may include promoting organizational cultures that value empirical data and encouraging use of standardized measures and training providers to use pragmatic standardized measures for clinical decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Participants did not consent to the sharing of data at the time of informed consent, and thus, data are not available. Survey materials are available upon request.

Notes

  1. Given the low factor loadings of the formal mental status exam and the formal clinician ratings, we reran the model without these two variables. Fit remained good (RMSEA = .031, CFI = .939, TLI = .931) and the pattern of results remained the same, with the exception that working in schools no longer predicted SMU.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was supported in part by R03 MH077752 from the National Institute of Mental Health to Kristin M. Hawley.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design, material preparation, and data collection were performed by JRC and KMH. Data analyses were performed by JRC and EC. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin M. Hawley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

This study was approved for a waiver of signed consent. All participants were provided with a consent statement.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, E., Cook, J.R. & Hawley, K.M. A Structural Model of Organization and Clinician Factors Associated with Standardized Measure Use in a National Survey of Youth Mental Health Providers. Adm Policy Ment Health 50, 876–887 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-023-01286-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-023-01286-7

Keywords

Navigation