Skip to main content


Log in

A National Study of Veterans Treatment Court Participants: Who Benefits and Who Recidivates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Although there are now over 400 veterans treatment courts (VTCs) in the country, there have been few studies on participant outcomes in functional domains. Using national data on 7931 veterans in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Justice Outreach program across 115 VA sites who entered a VTC from 2011 to 2015, we examined the housing, employment, income, and criminal justice outcomes of VTC participants; and identified veteran characteristics predictive of outcomes. VTC participants spent an average of nearly a year in the program and 14% experienced a new incarceration. From program admission to exit, 10% more participants were in their own housing, 12% more were receiving VA benefits, but only 1% more were employed. Controlling for background characteristics, a history of incarceration predicted poor criminal justice, housing, and employment outcomes. Participants with property offenses or probation/parole violations and those with substance use disorders were more likely to experience a new incarceration. Participants with more mental health problems were more likely to be receiving VA benefits and less likely to be employed at program exit. Together, these findings highlight the importance of proper substance abuse treatment as well as employment services for VTC participants so that they can benefit from the diversion process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Baldwin, J. M. (2015a). Investigating the programmatic attack: A national survey of veterans treatment courts. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105(3), 705–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. M. (2015b). Whom do they serve? A national examination of veterans treatment court participants and their challenges. Criminal Justice Policy Review. doi:10.1177/0887403415606184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. T., & Huebner, B. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R. (2004). Supported employment: Evidence for an evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4), 345–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson, J., Carson, A., Noonan, M., & Berzofsky, M. (2015). Veterans in Prison and Jail, 2011–12. Retrieved from

  • Clark, S., McGuire, J., & Blue-Howells, J. (2010). Development of veterans treatment courts: Local and legislative initiatives. Drug Court Review, 7, 171–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durose, M. R., Cooper, A. D., & Snyder, H. N. (2014). Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 30 States in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Retrieved from Washington, DC:

  • Edens, E. L., Kasprow, W., Tsai, J., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2011). Association of substance use and VA service-connected disability benefits with risk of homelessness among veterans. American Journal of Addictions, 20(5), 412–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatley, B., Clark, S., Rosenthal, J., & Blue-Howells, J. (2017). Veterans Court Inventory 2016 Update: Characteristics of and VA involvement in Veterans Treatment Courts and other Veteran-focused court programs from the Veterans Justice Outreach Specialist Perspective. Retrieved from Washington, DC.

  • Hartley, R. D., & Baldwin, J. M. (2016). Waging war on recidivism among justice-involved veterans: An impact evaluation of a large urban veterans treatment court. Criminal Justice Policy Review. doi:10.1177/0887403414562602

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, K. J., & Wingenfeld, S. (2016). A specialized treatment court for veterans with trauma exposure: Implications for the field. Community Mental Health Journal, 52(2), 127–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maestas, N., Mullen, K., & Strand, A. (2012). Does disability insurance receipt discourage work? Using examiner assignment to estimate causal effects of SSDI receipt. Retrieved from Ann Arbor, MI.

  • McGuire, J. (2007). Closing a front door to homelessness among veterans. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28(3–4), 389–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J., Clark, S., Blue-Howells, J., & Coe, C. (2013). An inventory of VA involvement in Veterans courts, dockets and tracks (White paper). Retrieved from

  • Motivans, M. A. (2015). Federal Justice Statistics, 2012-Statistical Tables. Retrieved from Washington, DC:

  • National Council of Alcoholism and Drug Dependence. (2015). Alcohol, drugs and crime. Retrieved from

  • Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawłowska-Cyprysiak, K., Konarska, M., & Żołnierczyk-Zreda, D. (2013). Self-perceived quality of life of people with physical disabilities and labour force participation. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 19(2), 185–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, S., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2001). Identifying the effect of unemployment on crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. T. (2009). Veterans treatment court: A proactive approach. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 35, 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J., Flatley, B., Kasprow, W. J., Clark, S., & Finlay, A. (2016). Diversion of veterans with criminal justice involvement to treatment courts: participant characteristics and outcomes. Psychiatric services, 68(4), 375–383. doi:10.1176/

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2013). Examination of Veterans Affairs disability compensation as a disincentive for employment in a population-based sample of veterans under age 65. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(4), 504–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2016). Psychosis, lack of job skills, and criminal history: Associations with employment in two samples of homeless men. Psychiatric Services, 67(6), 671–675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J., Rosenheck, R. A., Kasprow, W. J., & McGuire, J. F. (2014). Homelessness in a national sample of incarcerated veterans in state and federal prisons. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(3), 360–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65(4), 529–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2015). Veterans justice outreach. Retrieved from

  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2016). Vocational rehabilitation and employment. Retrieved from

  • Western, B., Kling, J. R., & Weiman, D. F. (2001). The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 410–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


No specific funding was provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest with this work.


The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the U.S. government or any federal agency.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, J., Finlay, A., Flatley, B. et al. A National Study of Veterans Treatment Court Participants: Who Benefits and Who Recidivates. Adm Policy Ment Health 45, 236–244 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: