Abstract
The individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment for people with serious mental illness is an evidence-based practice. Factors including a national learning community promoting IPS and enforcement of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision have spurred the growth of IPS nationwide. In this study we first evaluated the national prevalence and quality of IPS programs. We then evaluated the impact of learning community membership and Olmstead settlements on IPS program penetration and quality across the United States. We interviewed representatives from 48 state behavioral health agencies and 51 state vocational rehabilitation agencies. Survey questions examined the number of IPS programs in each state, the presence of an Olmstead settlement mandating employment services for people with serious mental illness, and the presence of three indicators of quality in IPS programs: collaboration between state behavioral health and vocational rehabilitation agencies, regular, independent fidelity monitoring, and technical assistance and training for IPS programs. Respondents from 38 (75%) states, including 19 states in the IPS Learning Community and 19 outside the learning community, reported a total of 523 IPS programs nationwide (M = 14, SD = 16). The state IPS program penetration rate (number of IPS programs per 1,000,000 people) ranged from 0.05 to 16.62 (M = 3.61, SD = 3.62) among states with IPS. The penetration rate was similar for learning community and non-learning community states with IPS, but learning community states were much more likely than non-learning community states with IPS to report the presence of each of three quality indicators. Eleven states reported Olmstead or other settlements that positively impacted employment services for people with serious mental illness, but among the 38 states with IPS programs, Olmstead states did not differ from non-Olmstead states in IPS program penetration or on the quality indicators. Nationally, most states provide IPS programs, but the within-state penetration rate and quality of implementation vary widely. While learning community and non-learning community states with IPS do not differ in the prevalence of IPS programs, learning community states are much more likely to report key quality indicators, which may enhance these states’ potential for sustaining and expanding IPS. Olmstead settlements have not yet shown a direct impact on the penetration and quality of IPS, but as the Department of Justice continues to enforce the Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision, their significance may increase.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarons, G. A., Sommerfeld, D. H., Hecht, D. B., Silovsky, J. F., & Chaffin, M. J. (2009). The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover: Evidence for a protective effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 270–280.
Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., & Bond, G. R. (2014). The IPS supported employment learning collaborative. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 37, 79–85.
Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., & Vogler, K. M. (1997). A fidelity scale for the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 40, 265–284.
Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (2014). Making the case for IPS supported employment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41, 69–73.
Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., Becker, D. R., & Noel, V. A. (2016). The IPS learning community: A longitudinal study of sustainment, quality, and outcome. Psychiatric Services, 67, 864–869.
Bond, G. R., Peterson, A. E., Becker, D. R., & Drake, R. E. (2012). Validating the revised individual placement and support fidelity scale (IPS-25). Psychiatric Services, 63, 758–763.
Brown, J. D., Barrett, A., Ireys, H., Caffery, E., & Hourihan, K. (2012). Evidence-based practices for Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Washington, DC: Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Bruns, E. J., Kerns, S. E., Pullmann, M. D., Hensley, S. W., Lutterman, T., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2016). Research, data, and evidence-based treatment use in state behavioral health systems, 2001–2012. Psychiatric Services, 67, 496–503.
Burnim, I. (2015). The promise of the Americans with Disabilities Act for people with mental illness. Journal of the American Medical Association, 313, 2223–2224.
Deci, P. A., Santos, A. B., Hiott, D. W., Schoenwald, S., & Dias, J. K. (1995). Dissemination of assertive community treatment teams. Psychiatric Services, 46, 676–678.
Drake, R. E., Becker, D. R., Goldman, H. H., & Martinez, R. A. (2006). Best practices: The Johnson & Johnson—Dartmouth Community Mental Health Program: Disseminating evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 57, 302–304.
Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., Goldman, H. H., Hogan, M. F., & Karakus, M. (2016). Individual Placement and Support services boost employment for people with serious mental illness, but funding is lacking. Health Affairs, 35, 1098–1105.
Drake, R. E., Goldman, H. H., Leff, H. S., Lehman, A. F., Dixon, L., Mueser, K. T., & Torrey, W. C. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 52, 179–182.
Finnerty, M. T., Rapp, C. A., Bond, G. R., Lynde, D. W., Ganju, V. J., & Goldman, H. H. (2009). The State Health Authority Yardstick (SHAY). Community Mental Health Journal, 45, 228–236.
Ganju, V. (2003). Implementation of evidence-based practices in state mental health systems: Implications for research and effectiveness studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29, 125–131.
Kim, S. J., Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Swanson, S. J., & Reese, S. L. (2015). Predictive validity of the individual placement and support fidelity scale (IPS-25): A replication study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 43, 209–216.
Lutterman, T. (2015). Supported employment services provided by state mental health systems. Paper presented at the Employment Symposium for SMHA Executives, Omaha, Nebraska.
Margolies, P. J., Broadway-Wilson, K., Gregory, R., Jewell, T. C., Scannevin, G., Myers, R. W., ... Dixon, L. B. (2015). Use of learning collaboratives by the center for practice innovations to bring IPS to scale in New York state. Psychiatric Services, 66, 4–6.
Marshall, T., Goldberg, R. W., Braude, L., Dougherty, R. H., Daniels, A. S., Ghose, S. S., … Delphin-Rittmon, M. E. (2014). Supported employment: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 65, 16–23.
Rosenheck, R. A., Leslie, D., Keefe, R., McEvoy, J., Swartz, M., Perkins, D., … Lieberman, J. (2006). Barriers to employment for people with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 411–417.
Salkever, D. S., Karakus, M. C., Slade, E. P., Harding, C. M., Hough, R. L., Rosenheck, R. A., … Yamada, A. M. (2007). Measures and predictors of community-based employment and earnings of persons with schizophrenia in a multisite study. Psychiatric Services, 58, 315–324.
Salyers, M. P., McKasson, M., Bond, G. R., McGrew, J. H., Rollins, A. L., & Boyle, C. (2007). The role of technical assistance centers in implementing evidence-based practices: Lessons learned. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10, 85–101.
White, D. A., Luther, L., Bonfils, K. A., & Salyers, M. P. (2015). Essential components of early intervention programs for psychosis: Available intervention services in the United States. Schizophrenia Research, 168, 79–83.
Funding
This study was funded by H133B140028 from the National Institute of Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Ms. Johnson-Kwochka declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Bond declares he has no conflict of interest. Ms. Becker declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Drake declares he has no conflict of interest. Ms. Greene declares she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson-Kwochka, A., Bond, G.R., Becker, D.R. et al. Prevalence and Quality of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Supported Employment in the United States. Adm Policy Ment Health 44, 311–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0787-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0787-5