Advertisement

Building a Working Community: Staff Practices in a Clubhouse for People with Severe Mental Illness

  • Fang-pei ChenEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The trademark of mental health clubhouses is that members and staff work side-by-side in partnership to enhance members’ autonomy, competency, and recovery. To explore the intricacies of this unique approach, the author conducted 53 in-depth interviews and 262 h of participant observation in 41 visits over a five-month period in a clubhouse. Findings indicated that staff members built the clubhouse as a “working community” by skillfully integrating three practice domains: social relationships, unit work, and individuals’ needs and pursuits. Distinctive skillsets helped to develop genuine relationships with members and facilitate community building, suggesting a model of generalist practice with specific intentionality.

Keywords

The clubhouse model Generalist practice Psychosocial rehabilitation Working community Mental health recovery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Social Work and Research, New Orleans, LA, USA, the 6th European Conference for Social Work Research, Lisbon, Portugal, and the 8th International Conference on Social Work in Health and Mental Health, Singapore. The author thanks staff and members at Fountain House for their support of this research. The author also thanks Hans Oh, Kathleen O’Hara, and Laura Cordisco Tsai for their assistance with initial data analysis.

Funding

This research received no funding support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Fang-pei Chen declares that she has no conflict of interest regarding this research.

Human and Animal Rights

The Institutional Review Boards at Fountain House and Columbia University approved this research. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed written consent was obtained from all individual participants interviewed in the study.

References

  1. Anderson, S. (1985). The role of staff at fountain house. The Fountain House Annual, 3, 1–3.Google Scholar
  2. Beard, J. H., Propst, R. N., & Malamud, T. J. (1982). The fountain house model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 5(1), 47–53.Google Scholar
  3. Clubhouse International (2016a). What is a Clubhouse? Retrieved from http://www.iccd.org/whatis.html
  4. Clubhouse International (2016b). International Directory, retrieved from http://www.clubhouse-intl.org/search_form.php
  5. Clubhouse International (2016c). International Standards for Clubhouse Programs. Retrieved from http://www.iccd.org/quality.html
  6. Clubhouse International (2016d). Resources, retrieved from http://www.clubhouse-intl.org/resources.html
  7. Clubhouse International (2016e). How Clubhouses Function, retrieved from http://www.iccd.org/function.html
  8. Davey, J. (1995). Engaging Members in Clubhouse Activities: Getting From “Will You?” to “I Want To”. Retrieved from http://www.iccd.org/20davey.htm
  9. Di Masso, J., Avi-Itzhak, T., & Obler, D. R. (2001). The clubhouse model: an outcome study on attendance, work attainment and status, and hospitalization recidivism. Work, 17, 23–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dougherty, S. J. (1994). The generalist role in clubhouse organizations. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 18(1), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle, A., Lanoil, J., & Dudek, K. (2013). Fountain house: Creating community in mental health practice. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finch, E. S., & Krantz, S. R. (1991). Low burnout in a high-stress setting: a study of staff adaptation at Fountain House. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 14(3), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herman, S. E., Onaga, E., Pernice-Duca, F., Oh, S., & Ferguson, C. (2005). Sense of community in clubhouse programs: member and staff concepts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(3–4), 343–356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Leff, H. S., McPartland, J. C., Banks, S., Dembling, B., Fisher, W., & Allen, I. E. (2004). Service quality as measured by service fit and mortality among public mental health system service recipients. Mental Health Services Research, 6, 93–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Macias, C., Rodican, C. F., Hargreaves, W. A., Jones, D. R., Barreira, P. J., & Wang, Q. (2006). Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1406–1415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McKay, C. E., Johnsen, M., Banks, S., & Stein, R. (2006). Employment transitions for clubhouse members. Work., 26(1), 67–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mowbray, C. T., Woodward, A. T., Holter, M. C., MacFarlane, P., & Bybee, D. (2009). Characteristics of users of consumer-run drop-in centers versus clubhouses. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 36(3), 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Payne, M. (2011). Humanistic social work: Core principles in practice. Chicago: Lyceum Books.Google Scholar
  19. Pernice-Duca, F. M. (2010). Staff and member perceptions of the clubhouse environment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(4), 345–356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Propst, R. (1992). Standards for clubhouse programs: How and why they were developed. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(2), 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schatzman, L. (1991). Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In D. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 303–314). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Schonebaum, A. D., Boyd, J. K., & Dudek, K. J. (2006). A comparison of competitive employment outcomes for the Clubhouse and PACT models. Psychiatric Services, 57(10), 1416–1420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. The US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Board. (September 2007). USPRA definition of psychiatric rehabilitation. Retrieved from https://uspra.ipower.com/Board/Governing_Documents/Definition_of_Psychiatric_Rehabilitation.pdf
  24. Tratnack, S. A., & Kane, C. (2010). Preventive health screenings in a clubhouse setting for persons with serious mental illness. American Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 14(4), 8–17.Google Scholar
  25. Tsang, A. W. K., Ng, R. M. K., & Yip, K. C. (2010). A six-month prospective case-controlled study of the effects of the clubhouse rehabilitation model on Chinese patients with chronic schizophrenia. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry, 20, 23–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vorspan, R. (1999) Clubhouse relationships need work! Paper presented at the 10th International Clubhouse Seminar, Toronto, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.fountainhouse.org/sites/default/files/ftp/articles/clubhouse-relations-need-work.pdf
  27. Waegemakers Schiff, J., Coleman, H., & Miner, D. (2008). Voluntary participation in rehabilitation: Lessons Learned from a clubhouse environment. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 27(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WelfareNational Chung Cheng UniversityChiayi CountyTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations