Community Engagement Strategies for Implementation of a Policy Supporting Evidence-Based Practices: A Case Study of Washington State

  • Gabrielle D’AngeloEmail author
  • Michael D. Pullmann
  • Aaron R. Lyon
Original Paper


After nearly two decades of cultivating an evidence based practice milieu in Washington State, the 2012 legislature passed House Bill 2536 (HB 2536) to promote the increased uptake and use of evidence based practices in the child welfare, juvenile justice and child behavioral health systems. The current paper examines stakeholder participation and engagement in HB 2536 during the first year of its implementation. The current paper describes the community response, influence, and engagement during the drafting of the bill language. It then describes initial policy implementation and community engagement efforts within a framework of implementation strategies (Powell et al. in Medical Care Research and Review 69:123–57, 2012). Analysis includes common concerns, statements of support, and suggestions from diverse stakeholder groups. Discussion reviews the lessons learned and future directions, including opportunities for additional collaborations with community stakeholders in the subsequent years of HB 2536 implementation.


Evidence based practices Implementation science Community engagement Policies and practice 



This publication was made possible in part by funding from Grant number K08 MH095939, awarded to the third author from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).


  1. Aarons, G., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in child welfare. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(1), 4–23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2010). Training therapists in evidence-based practice: A critical review of studies from a systems-contextual perspective. Clinical Psychology, 17(1), 1–30.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Beidas, R. S., Aarons, G., Barg, F., Evans, A., Hadley, T., Hoagwood, K., & Mandell, D. S. (2013). Policy to implementation: Evidence-based practice in community mental health—study protocol. Implementation Science,. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruns, E. J., & Hoagwood, E. K. (2008). State implementation of evidence-based practice for youths, Pt. I: Responses to the state of the evidence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(4), 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamberlain, P., Snowden, L. R., Padgett, C., Saldana, L., Roles, J., Holmes, L., & Landsverk, J. (2011). A strategy for assessing costs of implementing new practices in the child welfare system: Adapting the English cost calculator in the United States. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 24–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, J. M., Schnurr, P. P., Biyanova, T., & Coyne, J. C. (2009). Apples don’t fall far from the tree: Influences on psychotherapists’ adoption and sustained use of new therapies. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC), 60(5), 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damschroder, L., Aron, D., Keith, R., Kirsh, S., Alexander, J., & Lowery, J. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorsey, S., Berliner, L., Lyon, A. R., Pullmann, M. D., & Murray, L. K. (2014). A statewide common elements initiative for children’s mental health. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. doi: 10.1007/s11414-014-9430-y.Google Scholar
  9. Eccles, M., & Mittman, B. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1(1), 1.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2536, 62 Washington State Legislature. (2012).
  11. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).Google Scholar
  12. Garland, A. F., Bickman, L., & Chorpita, B. F. (2010). Change what? Identifying quality improvement targets by investigating usual mental health care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 37(1–2), 15–26. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0279-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Glasgow, R. E., Vinson, C., Chambers, D., Khoury, M. J., Kaplan, R. M., & Hunter, C. (2012). National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: Current and future directions. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1274–1281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoagwood, K. E., Olin, S. S., Horwitz, S., McKay, M., Cleek, A., Gleacher, A., et al. (2014). Scaling up evidence-based practices for children and families in New York State: Toward evidence based policies on implementation for state mental health systems. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(2), 145–157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hogue, A., Ozechowski, T. J., Robbins, M. S., & Waldron, H. B. (2013). Making fidelity an intramural game: Localizing quality assurance procedures to promote sustainability of evidence-based practices in usual care. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 20(1), 60–77.Google Scholar
  16. Holmes, L., Westlake, D., & Ward, H. (2008). Calculating and comparing the costs of multidimensional treatment foster care, England (MTFCE). Report to the Department for Children, Schools and Families. Google Scholar
  17. Isett, K. R., Burnam, M. A., Coleman-Beattie, B., Hyde, P. S., Morrissey, J. P., Magnabosco, J., & Goldman, H. H. (2007). The state policy context of implementation issues for evidence-based practices in mental health. Psychiatric Services, 58(7), 914–921.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyon, A. R., Dorsey, S., Pullmann, M., Silbaugh-Cowdin, J., & Berliner, L. (2015a). Clinician use of standardized assessments following a common elements psychotherapy training and consultation program. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(1), 47–60. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0543-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Lyon, A. R., Pullmann, M. D., Walker, S. C., & D'Angelo, G. (2015b). Community-sourced intervention programs: Review of submissions in response to a statewide call for “promising practices”. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0650-0.Google Scholar
  20. Magnabosco, J. L. (2006). Innovations in mental health services implementation: A report on state-level data from the U.S. evidence-based practices project. Implementation Science, 1, 13. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Milat, A. J., King, L., Bauman, A. E., & Redman, S. (2012). The concept of scalability: increasing the scale and potential adoption of health promotion interventions into policy and practice. Health Promotion International, 28(3), 285–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Owens, J. S., Lyon, A. R., Brandt, N. E., Warner, C. M., Nadeem, E., Spiel, C., & Wagner, M. (2014). Implementation science in school mental health: Key constructs in a developing research agenda. School Mental Health, 6(2), 99–111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., et al. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical Care Research and Review, 69(2), 123–157. doi: 10.1177/1077558711430690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2013). Implementation strategies: Recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implementation Science, 8, 139. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Public Committee Hearing: ESHB 2331, SHB 2658, E2SHB 2536, 2SHB 2289, HB 2401: Hearing before Senate Human Services and Corrections Committee, Senate, 62nd Washington State Legislature (2012).
  26. Public Committee Hearing: HB 2536, HB 2536, HB 2541, HB 2542: Hearing before House Early Learning & Human Services Committee, House of Representatives, 62nd Washington State Legislature (2012).
  27. Raghavan, R., Bright, C. L., & Shadoin, A. L. (2008). Toward a policy ecology of implementation of evidence-based practices in public mental health settings. Implementation Science, 3, 26. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Rhoades, B. L., Bumbarger, B. K., & Moore, J. E. (2012). The role of state-level prevention support system in promoting high-quality implementation and sustainability of evidence-based programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3–4), 386–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rieckmann, T., & Wheeler, K. (2010). What happens when the legislature mandates the use of evidence-based practices-Oregon’s experience [PowerPoint slides].
  30. Sheldrick, R. C., & Perrin, E. C. (2010). Medical home services for children with behavioral health conditions. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 31(2), 92–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Trupin, E., & Kerns, S. (2015). Introduction to the Special Issue: Legislation related to children’s evidence-based practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0666-5.Google Scholar
  32. Walker, S. C., Lyon, A. R., Aos, S., & Trupin, E. W. (2015). The consistencies and vagaries of the Washington state inventory of evidence-based practice: The definition of “evidence-based” in a policy context. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0652-y.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Weisz, J. R., Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K. M. (2006). Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. The American Psychologist, 61(7), 671–689. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.671.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Weisz, J. R., Chorpita, B. F., Palinkas, L. A., Schoenwald, S. K., Miranda, J., Bearman, S. K., & The Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2012). Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: A randomized effectiveness trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(3), 274–282. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. World Health Organization. (2009). Practical guidance for scaling up health service innovations. Switzerland: WHO Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabrielle D’Angelo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael D. Pullmann
    • 1
  • Aaron R. Lyon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations