A Comparison of Two Coaching Approaches to Enhance Implementation of a Recovery-Oriented Service Model
- 684 Downloads
Moving to recovery-oriented service provision in mental health may entail retraining existing staff, as well as training new staff. This represents a substantial burden on organisations, particularly since transfer of training into practice is often poor. Follow-up supervision and/or coaching have been found to improve the implementation and sustainment of new approaches. We compared the effect of two coaching conditions, skills-based and transformational coaching, on the implementation of a recovery-oriented model following training. Training followed by coaching led to significant sustained improvements in the quality of care planning in accordance with the new model over the 12-month study period. No interaction effect was observed between the two conditions. However, post hoc analyses suggest that transformational coaching warrants further exploration. The results support the provision of supervision in the form of coaching in the implementation of a recovery-oriented service model, and suggest the need to better elucidate the mechanisms within different coaching approaches that might contribute to improved care.
KeywordsImplementation Transfer of training Transformational coaching Care planning Values
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council [Grant Number LP0990708].
Conflict of interest
None for any author.
- Alexander, G., & Renshaw, B. (2005). Super coaching: The missing ingredient for high performance. London: Random House Business.Google Scholar
- Crowe, T. P., Oades, L. G., Deane, F. P., Ciarrocci, J., & Williams, V. (2011). Parallel processes in clinical supervision: Implications for coaching mental health practitioners. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 9(2), 56–66.Google Scholar
- Deane, F. P., Crowe, T. P., Oades, L. G., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., Williams, V., et al. (2010). Facilitating the transfer of collaborative recovery training into clinical practice: Intervention and coaching protocols. Wollongong: Australia Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
- Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2010). Transformational coaching. In E. Cox, T. Bachkirova, & D. Clutterbuck (Eds.), The complete handbook of coaching (pp. 231–244). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kelly, P. (2007). Does homework improve outcomes for individuals diagnosed with severe mental illness? Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Wollongong, Australia. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/729/. Accessed 23 Aug 2013.
- Oades, L. G., & Crowe, T. P. (2008). Life journey enhancement tools (LifeJET). Wollongong: Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
- Oades, L. G., Crowe, T. P., & Nguyen, M. (2009). Leadership coaching transforming mental health systems from the inside out: The collaborative recovery model as person-centred strengths based coaching psychology. International Coaching Psychology Review, 4(1), 25–36.Google Scholar
- Sholomskas, D. E., Syracuse-Siewert, G., Rounsaville, B. J., Ball, S. A., Nuro, K. F., & Carroll, K. M. (2005). We don’t train in vain: A dissemination trial of three strategies of training clinicians in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(1), 106–115.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Whitmore, J. (2002). Coaching for performance (3rd ed.). London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar