Advertisement

Quality Indicators for Multidisciplinary Team Functioning in Community-Based Children’s Mental Health Services

  • Krista Kutash
  • Mary Acri
  • Michele Pollock
  • Kelsey Armusewicz
  • Su-chin Serene Olin
  • Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood
Original Paper

Abstract

The current study examined the organizational social context in 21 community-based programs serving youth at-risk for out-of-home care due to emotional or behavioral disorders and their families and program performance on five quality indicators of team functioning in teams that included a family support specialist. Results indicate that programs with higher performance on structures to facilitate teamwork, informal communication mechanisms among team members, and the ability to integrate family support specialists as equal members of the team showed more positive organizational functioning. Implications for the role of quality indicators in health care reform efforts are discussed.

Keywords

Quality indicators Organizational social context Family support services Child mental health Multidisciplinary team 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant 1R01MH085969).

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., Glisson, C., Green, P. D., Hoagwood, K., Kelleher, K. J., Landsverk, J. A., et al. (2012). The organizational social context of mental health services and clinician attitudes toward evidence-based practice: A United States national study. Implementation Science, 7(1), 56. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertram, R. M., Suter, J. C., Bruns, E. J., & O’Rourke, K. E. (2011). Implementation research and wraparound literature: Building a research agenda. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 713–725. doi: 10.1007/s10826-010-9430-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., Loustau, M., Sibony, O., & Alberti, C. (2011). Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20476. doi: 10.1371journal.pone.0020476.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavaleri, M. A., Perez, M., Burton, G., Penn, M., Beharie, N., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2010). Developing the support, teambuilding, and referral (STAR) intervention: A research/community partnership. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 15(1), 56–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2009.00541.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for Health Care Strategies. (2012). Medicaid financing for family and youth peer support: A scan of state programs. [Technical Assistance Tool series]. Retrieved January 2013 from http://www.chcs.org/publications3960.
  6. Chinman, M., Lucksted, A., Gresen, R., Davis, M., Losonczy, M., Sussner, B., et al. (2008). Early Experiences of employing consumer-providers in the VA. Psychiatric Services, 59(11), 1315–1321. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.11.1315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Sells, D., & Rowe, M. (2006). Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: A report from the field. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(3), 443–450. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj043.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, T. S., Scheer, S. D., Gavazzi, S. M., & Uppal, R. (2010). Parent advocates in children’s mental health: Program implementation processes and considerations. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(6), 468–483. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0288-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Firth-Cozens, J. (2001). Multidisciplinary teamwork: The good, bad, and everything in between. Quality Health Care, 10(2), 65–66. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gates, L. B., & Akabas, S. H. (2007). Developing strategies to integrate peer providers into the staff of mental health agencies. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(3), 293–306. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0109-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gates, L. B., Mandiberg, J. M., & Akabas, S. H. (2010). Building capacity in social service agencies to employ peer providers. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 34(2), 145–152. doi: 10.2975/34.2.2010.145.152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glisson, C. A. (2002). The organizational context of children’s mental health services. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5(4), 233–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glisson, C., & Durick, M. (1988). Predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in human service organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glisson, C., & Green, P. (2006). The effects of organizational culture and climate on the access to mental health care in child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(4), 433–448. doi: 10.1007/s10488-005-0016-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glisson, C., Hemmelgarn, A., Green, P., Dukes, D., Atkinson, S., & Williams, N. J. (2012). Randomized trial of the ARC organization intervention with community-based mental health programs and clinicians serving youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(3), 780–787. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.05.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glisson, C., Hemmelgarn, A., Green, P., & Williams, N. (2013). The organizational social context of peer-delivered family support services: Implications for research and practice Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, (this issue).Google Scholar
  17. Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 767–794. doi: 10.1002/job.162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glisson, C., Landsverk, J., Schoenwald, S., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Mayberg, S., et al. (2008). Assessing the Organizational Social Context (OSC) of mental health services: Implications for research and practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1–2), 98–113. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grumbach, M. D., & Bodenheimer, T. (2004). Can health care teams improve primary care practice? Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(10), 1246–1251. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Hoagwood, K. E., Cavaleri, M. A., Olin, S. S., Burns, B. J., Slaton, E., Gruttadaro, D., et al. (2010). Family support in children’s mental health: A review and synthesis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–45. doi: 10.1007/s10567-009-0060-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoagwood, K. E., & Kolko, D. J. (2009). Introduction to the special section on practice context: A glimpse into the nether world of public mental health services for children and families. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(1), 35–36. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0201-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Institute of Medicine Committee on Crossing the Quality Chasm: Adaptation to Mental Health and Addictive Disorders. (2006). Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance-use conditions: Quality Chasm series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved January 2013 from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11470.
  24. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & IIgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x.Google Scholar
  25. Leipzig, R. M., Hyer, K. H., Ek, K., Wallenstein, S., Vezina, M. L., Fairchild, S., et al. (2002). Attitudes toward working on interdisciplinary healthcare teams: A comparison by discipline. American Geriatrics Society, 50(6), 1141–1148. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50274.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lichtenstein, R., Alexander, J. A., Jinnett, K., & Ullman, E. (1997). Embedded intergroup relations in interdisciplinary teams: Effects on perceptions of level of team integration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(4), 413–434. doi: 10.1177/0021886397334001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
  28. Miles, P. (2008). Family partners and the wraparound process. In E. J. Bruns & J. S. Walker (Eds.), The resource guide to wraparound. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center for Family Support and Children’s Mental Health.Google Scholar
  29. Miles, P., Brown, N., & The National Wraparound Initiative Implementation Work Group. (2011). Wraparound implementation guide: A handbook for administrators and managers. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative.Google Scholar
  30. Moll, S., Holmes, J., Geronimo, J., & Sherman, D. (2009). Work transitions for peer support providers in traditional mental health programs: Unique challenges and opportunities. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 33(4), 449–458. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0893.Google Scholar
  31. Molyneux, J. (2001). Interprofessional teamworking: What makes teams work well? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(1), 29–35. doi: 10.1080/13561820020022855.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olin, S. S., Kutash, K., Pollock, M., Burns, B. J., Kuppinger, A., Craig, N., et al. (2013a). Developing quality indicators for family support services in community team based mental health care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0501-9.
  33. Olin, S. S., Williams, N., Pollock, M., Armusewicz, K., Kutash, K., Glisson, C., et al. (2013b). Quality indicators for family support services and their relationship to organizational social context. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0499-z.
  34. Penn, M., & Osher, T. (2008). The application of the ten principles of the wraparound process to the role of family partners on wraparound teams. The resource guide to wraparound. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center for Family Support and Children’s Mental Health.Google Scholar
  35. Peterson, M. F., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Wilderom, C. P. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Pincus, H. A., Spaeth-Rublee, B., & Walkins, K. E. (2011). The case for measuring quality in mental health and substance abuse care. Health Affairs, 30(4), 730–736. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809.Google Scholar
  38. Roberge, M.-E., & van Dick, R. (2010). Recognizing the benefits of diversity: When and how does diversity increase group performance? Human Resource Management Review, 20(4), 295–308. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sai, C., Tonniges, T. F., Osterhus, E., & Taba, S. (2004). History of the medical home concept. Pediatrics, 113(Suppl 4), 1473–1478.Google Scholar
  40. Schofield, R. F., & Amodeo, M. (1999). Interdisciplinary teams in health care and human services settings: Are they effective? Health and Social Work, 24(3), 210–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stroul, B. A. (Ed.). (1996). Children’s mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society. Baltimore, MD: P.H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Suter, J. D., & Bruns, E. J. (2009). Effectiveness of the Wraparound process for children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 12(4), 336–351. doi: 10.1007/s10567-009-0059-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van de Ven, A. H., Rogers, R. W., Bechara, J. P., & Sun, K. (2008). Organizational diversity, integration and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(30), 335–354. doi: 10.1002/job.511.Google Scholar
  44. Verbeke, W., Volgering, M., & Hessels, M. (1998). Exploring the conceptual expansion within the field of organizational behaviour: Organizational climate and organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 35(3), 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vinokur, A. D., Price, R. H., & Schul, Y. (1995). Impact of the JOBS intervention on unemployed workers varying in risk for depression. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(1), 39–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walker, J. S. (2008). How, and why, does Wraparound work: A theory of change. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Portland State University.Google Scholar
  47. Walker, J. S., Bruns, E. J., Conlan, L., & LaFroce, C. (2011). The National Wraparound Initiative: A community of practice approach to building knowledge in the field of children’s mental health. Best Practices in Mental Health, 7(1), 26–46.Google Scholar
  48. Wensing, M., Wollersheim, H., & Grol, R. (2006). Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: A structured review of reviews. Implementation Science, 1, 2. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-2.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winters, N. C., & Metz, W. P. (2009). The wraparound approach in systems of care. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 32(1), 135–151. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2008.11.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krista Kutash
    • 1
  • Mary Acri
    • 2
  • Michele Pollock
    • 2
  • Kelsey Armusewicz
    • 2
  • Su-chin Serene Olin
    • 2
  • Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Child and Family Studies, Florida Mental Health InstituteUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.New York State Office of Mental HealthAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations