Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Among Public Agencies Serving Abused and Neglected Youth

Abstract

This study examined the role of inter-organizational collaboration in implementing new evidence-based practices for addressing problem behaviors in at-risk youth. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 38 systems leaders of probation, mental health, and child welfare departments of 12 California counties participating in a large randomized controlled trial to scale-up the use of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care. Three sets of collaboration characteristics were identified: (1) characteristics of collaboration process, (2) characteristics of the external environment, and (3) characteristics of participating organizations and individuals. Inter-organizational collaboration enables an exchange of information and advice and a pooling of resources individual agencies may require for successful implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice in implementation in public mental health and child welfare systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4–23.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aarons, G. A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2007). Implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare: service provider perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34, 411–419.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhavian, P., Amaral, D., Murphy, M., & Uehlinger, K. (1999). Collaborative practice: A nursing perspective of the psychiatric interdisciplinary treatment team. Holistic Nursing Practice, 13(2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bai, Y., Wells, R., & Hillemeier, M. (2009). Coordinaton between child welfare agencies and mental health services providers, children’s service use, and outcomes. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 372–381.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chamberlain, P., Brown, C. H., Saldana, L., Reid, J., Wang, W., Marsenich, L.,…Bouwman, G. (2008). Engaging and recruiting counties in an experiment on implementing evidence-based practice in California. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(4), 250–260.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chuang, E., & Wells, R. (2010). The role of inter-agency collaboration in facilitating receipt of behavioral health services for youth involved with child welfare and juvenile justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1814–1822.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Conger, D., and Ross, T. (2006). Project confirm: An outcome evaluation of a program for children in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(1), 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooke, R. A., & Rousseau, D. M. (1988). Behavioral norms and expectations: A quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group and Organization Management, 13(3), 245–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cottrell, D., Lucey, D., Porter, I., & Walker, D. (2000). Joint working between child and adolescent mental health services and the department of social services: The Leeds model. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 5(4), 481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crea, T. M., Crampton, D. S., Abramson-Madden, A., & Usher, C. L. (2008). Variability in the implementation of Team Decisionmaking (TDM): Scope and compliance with the Family to Family practice model. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(11), 1221–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Bealieu, M. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frrameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(suppl. 1), 116–131.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M., & Mannion, R. (2000). Organisational culture and quality of health care. Quality in Health Care, 9, 111–119.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dedrick, R. F., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2011). Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of a scale measuring interagency collaboration of children’s mental health agencies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19(1), 27–40.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The logic of naturalistic inquiry. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Sociological Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ehrle, J., Andrews Scarcella, C., & Geen, R. (2004). Teaming up: collaboration between welfare and child welfare agencies since welfare reform. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(3), 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., and Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication No. 231). Tampa, FL: National Implementation Research Network, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.

  18. Fraser, D. (2000). QSR NVivo NUD*IST vivo reference guide. Melbourne: QSR International.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1261–1267.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Glisson, C. (2007). Assessing and changing organizational culture and climate for effective services. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 736–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children’s service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 401–421.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grace, M., Coventry, L., & Batterham, D. (2012). The role of interagency collaboration in “joined-up” case management. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26, 141–149.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Green, B. L., Rockhill, A., and Burrus, S. (2008). The role of interagency collaboration for substance-abusing families involved with child welfare. Child Welfare, 87(1), 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hemmelgarn, A. L., Glisson, C., & Dukes, D. (2001). Emergency room culture and the emotional support component of family-centered care. Children’s Health Care, 30(2), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hodges, S., Nesman, T., and Hernandez, M. (1999). Promising practices: Building collaboration in systems of care. Systems of care: Promising practices in children’s mental health, 1998 series (Vol. 6). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.

  28. Hogan, C., & Murphey, D. (2002). Outcomes: Reframing responsibility for well-being. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Horwath, J., & Morrison, T. (2007). Collaboration, integration and change in children’s services: critical issues and key ingredients. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31(1), 55–69.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson, L. J., Zorn, D., Tam, B. K. Y., Lamontaigne, M., & Johnson, S. A. (2003). Ineragency and interprofessional collaboration in community care: The interdependence of structures and values. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 17, 69–83.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones, N., Thomas, P., & Rudd, L. (2004). Collaborating for mental health services in Wales: A process evaluation. Public Administration, 82, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lippitt, R., & Van Til, J. (1981). Can we achieve a collaborative community? Issues, imperatives, potentials. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 10, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Longoria, R. A. (2005). Is inter-organizational collaboration always a good thing? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 32, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Milbourne, L., Macrae, S., & Maguire, M. (2003). Collaborative solutions or new policy problems: Exploring multi-agency partnerships in education and health work. Journal of Education Policy, 18(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2011a). Mixed method designs in implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 44–53.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Palinkas, L. A., Allred, C. A., & Landsverk, J. (2005). Models of research-operational collaboration for behavioral health in space. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76(6, Suppl.), B52–B60.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Palinkas, L. A., Holloway, I. W., Rice, E., Fuentes, D., Wu, Q., & Chamberlain, P. (2011b). Social networks and implementation of evidence-based practices in public youth-serving systems: A mixed methods study. Implementation Science, 6, 113.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Palinkas, L. A., Schoenwald, S. K., Hoagwood, K., Landsverk, J., Chorpita, B., Weisz, J. R.,…the MacArthur Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2008). An ethnographic study of implementation of evidence-based treatments in child mental health: First steps. Psychiatric Services, 59(7), 738–746.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Prince, J., & Austin, M. J. (2005). Inter-agency collaboration in child welfare and child mental health systems. Social Work in Mental Health, 4(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Salmon, G., & Faris, J. (2006). Multi-agency collaboration, multiple levels of meaning: Social constructionism and the CMM model as tools to furter our understanding. Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 272–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schoenwald, S. K., Kelleher, K., Weisz, J. R., and The Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2008). Building bridges to evidence-based practice: The MacArthur foundation child system and treatment enhancement projects (Child STEPs). Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1–2), 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Scott, W. R. (1985). Systems within systems. American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sedlak, A., Schultz, D., Wells, S., Lyons, P., Doueck, H., & Gragg, F. (2006). Child protection and justice systems processing of serious child abuse and neglect cases. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(6), 657–677.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Simpson, D. D. (2002). A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 171–182.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sosna, T., & Marsenich, L. (2006). Community development team model: Supporting the model adherent implementation of programs and practices. Sacramento: California Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986). A system of care for children and adolescents with severe emotional disturbance (Rev ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Child development Center, National Technical Assistance Center for Child Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, W., Saldana, L., Brown, C. H., & Chamberlain, P. (2010). Factors that influenced county system leaders to implement an evidence-based program: a baseline survey within a randomized controlled trial. Implementation Science, 5, 72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Weinberg, L. A., Zetlin, A., and Shea, N. M. (2009). Removing barriers to educating children in foster care through interagency collaboration: A seven county multiple-case study. Child Welfare, 88(4), 77–111.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Willms, D. G., Best, J. A., Taylor, D. W., Gilbert, J. R., Wilson, D. M. C., Lindsay, E. A.,…Singer, J. (1990). A systematic approach for using qualitative methods in primary prevention research. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 4(4), 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this research was provided by the William T. Grant Foundation [Grant ID# 9493] and, for the parent grant, NIMH RO1MH07658 and DHHS Childrens’Bureau. The sponsors did not have a role or influence in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report, and the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence A. Palinkas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palinkas, L.A., Fuentes, D., Finno, M. et al. Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Among Public Agencies Serving Abused and Neglected Youth. Adm Policy Ment Health 41, 74–85 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0437-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mental health services
  • Child welfare
  • Juvenile justice
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Implementation
  • Collaboration