Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abstract

Behavioral health carve-out arrangements create financial disincentives for primary care providers (PCPs) to treat depression. A novel collaboration between a primary care practice, a health insurer, and a managed behavioral health organization (MBHO) allows PCPs to receive reimbursement and schedule longer appointments to care for depressed patients. This article describes the details of the arrangement, and early results of this collaboration. Early results find that financial incentives are critical for implementation, but that time incentives do not appear to motivate PCPs. Sustainability of this model will require participation of multiple primary care practices, health insurers, and MBHOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. S. Brody, S. R. Hahn, R. L. Spitzer, K. Kroenke, M. Linzer, F. V. Gruy de and J. B. Williams, Identifying patients with depression in the primary care setting: A more efficient method. Archives of Internal Medicine 158 (1998) 2469-2475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Frank, T. G. McGuire, S. L. Normand and H. H. Goldman, The value of mental health care at the system level: The case of treating depression. Health Affairs (Millwood) 18 (1999) 71-88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S. Gilbody, P. Whitty, J. Grimshaw and R. Thomas, Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care: A systematic review. JAMA 289 (2003) 3145-3151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • W. Katon and H. Schulberg, Epidemiology of depression in primary care. General Hospital Psychiatry 14 (1992) 237-247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Katzelnick, G. E. Simon, S. D. Pearson, W. G. Manning, C. P. Helstad, H. J. Henk, S. M. Cole, E. H. Lin, L. H. Taylor and K. A. Kobak, Randomized trial of a depression management program in high utilizers of medical care. Archives of Family Medicine 9 (2000) 345-351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Kessler, P. Berglund, O. Demler, R. Jin, D. Koretz, K. R. Merikangas, A. J. Rush, E. E. Walters and P. S. Wang, The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 289 (2003) 3095-3105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • G. E. Kikano, S. J. Zyzanski, R. S. Gotler and K. C. Stange, High-volume practice: Are there trade-offs?. Family Practice Manager 7 (2000) 63-64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • E. A. McGlynn, S. M. Asch, J. Adams, J. Keesey, J. Hicks, A. DeCristofaro and E. A. Kerr, The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine 348 (2003) 2635-2645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • S. E. Moser, J. N. Dorsch and R. Kellerman, The RAFT approach to academic detailing with preceptors. Family Medicine 36 (2004) 316-318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • G. E. Simon, E. J. Ludman, S. Tutty, B. Operskalski and M. Korff Von, Telephone psychotherapy and telephone care management for primary care patients starting antidepressant treatment: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 292 (2004) 935-942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feldman, M.D., Ong, M.K., Lee, D.L. et al. Realigning Economic Incentives for Depression Care at UCSF. Adm Policy Ment Health 33, 34–38 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-005-4233-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-005-4233-3

Keywords

Navigation