Skip to main content

Differential Categories Revisited


Differential categories were introduced to provide a minimal categorical doctrine for differential linear logic. Here we revisit the formalism and, in particular, examine the two different approaches to defining differentiation which were introduced. The basic approach used a deriving transformation, while a more refined approach, in the presence of a bialgebra modality, used a codereliction. The latter approach is particularly relevant to linear logic settings, where the coalgebra modality is monoidal and the Seely isomorphisms give rise to a bialgebra modality. Here, we prove that these apparently distinct notions of differentiation, in the presence of a monoidal coalgebra modality, are completely equivalent. Thus, for linear logic settings, there is only one notion of differentiation. This paper also presents a number of separating examples for coalgebra modalities including examples which are and are not monoidal, as well as examples which do and do not support differential structure. Of particular interest is the observation that—somewhat counter-intuitively—differential algebras never induce a differential category although they provide a monoidal coalgebra modality. On the other hand, Rota–Baxter algebras—which are usually associated with integration—provide an example of a differential category which has a non-monoidal coalgebra modality.


  1. Bierman, G.M.: What is a categorical model of intuitionistic linear logic? In: International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, pp. 78–93. Springer (1995)

  2. Blute, R.F., Cockett, J.R.B., Porter, T., Seely, R.A.G.: Kähler categories. Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques 52(4), 253–268 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Blute, R.F., Cockett, J.R.B., Seely, R.A.G.: Differential categories. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 16(06), 1049–1083 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blute, R.F., Cockett, J.R.B., Seely, R.A.G.: Cartesian differential categories. Theory Appl. Categ. 22(23), 622–672 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Blute, R.F., Cockett, J.R.B., Seely, R.A.G.: Cartesian differential storage categories. Theory Appl. Categ. 30(18), 620–686 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Blute, R.F., Ehrhard, T., Tasson, C.: A convenient differential category. Cahiers de Top. et Géom Diff LIII, 211–232 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Blute, R.F., Lucyshyn-Wright, R.B.B., O’Neill, K.: Derivations in codifferential categories. Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques 57, 243–280 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrhard, T., Regnier, L.: The differential lambda-calculus. Theor. Comput. Sci. 309(1), 1–41 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrhard, T., Regnier, L.: Differential interaction nets. Theor. Comput. Sci. 364(2), 166–195 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiore, M.P.: Differential structure in models of multiplicative biadditive intuitionistic linear logic. In: International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, pp. 163–177. Springer (2007)

  11. Guo, L.: An Introduction to Rota–Baxter Algebra, vol. 2. International Press Somerville, Somerville (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, L., Keigher, W.: On differential Rota–Baxter algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212(3), 522–540 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Joyal, A., Street, R.: The geometry of tensor calculus, i. Adv. Math. 88(1), 55–112 (1991)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lang, S.: Algebra, revised 3rd ed. In: Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 211 (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer, New York (1971, revised 2013)

  16. Melliès, P.A.: Categorical models of linear logic revisited. Working paper or preprint (2003)

  17. Schalk, A.: What is a categorical model of linear logic? Manuscript. (2004)

  18. Seely, R.A.G.: Linear Logic,*-Autonomous Categories and Cofree Coalgebras, vol. 92. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Selinger, P.: A survey of graphical languages for monoidal categories. In: New Structures for Physics, pp. 289–355. Springer (2010)

  20. Zhang, S., Guo, L., Keigher, W.: Monads and distributive laws for rota-baxter and differential algebras. Adv. Appl. Math. 72, 139–165 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for very helpful and constructive comments in their review, especially regarding the overall structure of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.-S. P. Lemay.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The first and second author are supported by NSERC. The third author is supported by Kellogg College, the Clarendon Fund, and the Oxford-Google DeepMind Graduate Scholarship. The fourth author is supported by FRQNT.

Ross Street.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blute, R.F., Cockett, J.R.B., Lemay, JS.P. et al. Differential Categories Revisited. Appl Categor Struct 28, 171–235 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Differential categories
  • Coalgebra modalities
  • Coderelictions