Skip to main content

Comparison of the Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation and Neurofeedback on Sustained Attention Among Elementary School Students with Specific Learning Disorder: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback volume 43, pages 301–307 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Specific learning disorder (SLD) can occur along with the problems of attention performance and be complicated by them. Recent studies have reported the positive effects of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) and neurofeedback (NFB) on sustained attention (SA) in SLD. Nevertheless, it has not yet been determinedwhat kind of treatment may be the most appropriate option for this disorder in terms of the different functions of cognitive status, especially SA. This preliminary study aimed to compare CR and NFB effects on SA among elementary school students with SLD using a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT). Fifty- three eligible students with a DSM-5 SLD diagnosis, aged 7–10, were randomly allocated in NFB (n = 18), CR (n = 18), and control groups (n = 17). All the participants were evaluated for SA by performing the continuous performance test (CPT) on the studied groups at the time of their inclusion in the study and 7 weeks after it. The intervention groups took part in 20 sessions of CR and 20 sessions of NFB. Conversely, the untreated group were evaluated without any intervention.15 boys and 30 girls in 3 groups completed the study (n = 15 per group). The mean and standard deviation of participants’ age were (8.66 ± 1.48) years, (8.40 ± 1.73) years and (8.53 ± 1.63) years in CR, NFB and untreated groups, respectively. The results showed significant differences between the groups based on the variables of the CPT test (p < 0.05). Also, the significant effects of the variables represented the higher scores of the CR compared to the NFB group (p < 0.001). This study provides einitial evidence that CR is more effective than NFB on SA improvement among students with SLD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Adams, Z. W., Roberts, W. M., Milich, R., & Fillmore, M. T. (2011). Does response variability predict distractibility among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Psychological Assessment, 23, 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, M. P., Langdon, D., Montalban, X., Benedict, R. H., DeLuca, J., Krupp, L. B., et al. (2013).Treatment of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: Position paper. Journal of Neurology, 260(6),1452–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013) DSM 5: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Bergera, T., & Cassutob, H. (2014). The effect of environmental distractors incorporation into a CPT on sustained attention and ADHD diagnosis among adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. W., & Copeland, D. R. (2002). Attentional processes and their remediation in children treated for cancer: A literature review and the development of a therapeutic approach. Journal of the International Neuropsychology Society, 8(1), 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerasa, A., Gioia, M. C., Valentino, P., Nisticò, R., Chiriaco, C., Pirritano, D., et al. (2013). Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation of attention deficits for multiple sclerosis: A randomized trial with FMRI correlates. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27(4), 284–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. (1994). The conners continuous performance test. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, S. S., Walsh, A. K., Goldston, D. B., Arnold, E. M., Reboussin, B. A., & Wood, F. B. (2006). Suicidality, school dropout, and reading problems among adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 507–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Giglio, L., De Luca, F., Prosperini, L., Borriello, G., Bianchi, V., Pantano, P., et al. (2015). A low-cost cognitive rehabilitation with a commercial video game improves sustained attention and executive functions in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29(5), 453–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demos, J. N. (2005). Getting start with neurofeedback. New York: W.W.Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C. C., Rumsey, J. M., Wilkniss, S. M., Denckla, M. B., Hamburger, S. D., & Odou-Potkin, M. (1994). Developmental dyslexia and attention dysfunction in adults: Brain potential indices of information processing. Psychophysiology, 31(4), 386–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facoetti, A., & Molteni, M. (2000). Is attentional focusing an inhibitory process at distractor location? Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 185–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facoetti, A., Zorzi, M., Cestnick, R., Lorusso, M. L., Molteni, M., et al. (2006). The relationship between visuo-spatial attention and non-word reading in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 841–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galletly, C., & Rigby, A. (2013). An overview of cognitive remediation therapy for people with severe mental illness. ISRN Rehabilitation.

  • Gray, S. A., Chaban, P., Martinussen, R., Goldberg, R., Gotlieb, H., Kronitz, R., et al. (2012). Effects of a computerized working memory training program on working memory, attention, and academics in adolescents with severe LD and comorbid ADHD: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(12), 1277–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 20.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, E., Ochmann, S., Hoffmann, W., Schneider, W., Cavedo, E., Hampel, H., et al. (2015). Cognitive rehabilitation in alzheimer’s disease - A conceptual and methodological review. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease 2, 142–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P.C. (1991). Child and adolescent therapy: Cognitive–behavioral procedures. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, N. S., Ross, T. J., Hoffmann, R., Garavan, H., & Stein, E. A. (2003). Multiple neuronal networks mediate sustained attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(7), 1028–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, S. K., & Makeig, S. (2012). Clinical utility of EEG in attentiondeficit/ hyperactivity disorder: A research update. Neurotherapeutics, 9, 569–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Martín, S., Albert, J., Fernández-Jaén, A., & Carretié, L. (2013). Emotional distraction in boys with ADHD: Neural and behavioral correlates. Brain and Cognition, 83, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzbani, H., Marateb, H. R., & Mansourian, M. (2016). Neurofeedback: A comprehensive review on System design, methodology and clinical applications. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 7(2), 143–158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marzocchi, G. M., Ornaghi, S., & Barboglio, S. (2009). What are the causes of the attention deficits observed in children with dyslexia? Child Neuropsychology, 15(6), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, K., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Bruder, J., & Schulte-Korne, G. (2014). Specific learning disorder: Prevalence and gender differences. PLoS ONE, 9(7), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monastra, V. J., Lynn, S., Linden, M., Lubar, J. F., Gruzelier, J., & LaVaque, T. J. (2005). Electroencephalographic biofeedback in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 30, 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosanezhad Jeddi, E., & Nazari, M. A. (2013). Effectiveness of EEG-Biofeedback on attentiveness, working memory and quantitative electroencephalography on reading disorder. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 35–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muriel, V., Garcia-Molina, A., Aparicio-Lopez, C., Ensenat, A., & Roig-Rovira, T. (2014). Cognitive stimulation in children with cerebral palsy. Revista De Neurologia, 59(10), 443–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nazari, M. A., Querne, L., De Broca, A., & Berquin, P. (2012). Effectiveness of EEG biofeedback as compared with methylphenidate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A clinical out-come study. Neuroscience & Medicine, 2(2), 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oken, B. S., Salinsky, M. C., & Elsas, S. M. (2006). Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: Physiological basis and measurement. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(9), 1885–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peijnenborgh, J. C., Hurks, P. M., Vles, J. S., Aldenkamp, A. P. & Hendriksen, J. G. (2016). Efficacy of working memory training in children and adolescents with learning disabilities: A review study and meta-analysis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 26(5–6), 645–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Play Attention [home page on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.playattention.com. Accessed August 22, 2013.

  • Raz, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Sadeh, A., & Dan, O. (2014). Reliability and validity of the online continuous performance test among young adults. Assessment, 21(1), 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Blanco, L., Lubrini, G., Vidal-Mariño, C., & Ríos-Lago, M. (2017). Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation of attention, executive functions, and working memory in psychotic disorders: A systematic review. Actas Espanolas De Psiquiatria, 45(4), 167–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami, R., Salamati, P., Yarandi, K. K., Khoshnevisan, A., Saadat, S., Kamali, Z. S., et al. (2017). Effects of neurofeedback on the short-term memory and continuous attention of patients with moderate traumatic brain injury: A preliminary randomized controlled clinical trial. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 20(5), 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sastre-Garriga, J., Alonso, J., Renom, M., & Arévalo, M. J. (2011). A functional magnetic resonance proof of concept pilot trial of cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 17, 457–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. S., & Lentz, F. E. (1991). Vocational-technical programs: Follow-up of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohlberg, M., & Mateer, C. A. (1999). Attention process training I (APT–I). Wake Forest: Lash & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlberg, M. M., Johnson, L., Paule, L., Raskin, S. A., & Mateer, C. A. (1999). Attention process training II (APT–II). Wake Forest: Lash & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (1989). Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, N. J., Frenette, E. C., Rene, K. M., Brennan, R. T., & Perrin, E. C. (2014). In-school neurofeedback training for ADHD: Sustained improvements from a randomized control trial. Pediatrics, 133(3), 483–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterr, A. M. (2004). Attention performance in young adults with learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2007). The influence of working memory on reading growth in subgroups of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. A., & Reder, S. (1989). Educational attainment of edults with learning disabilities. In S. A. Vogel & S. Reder (Eds.), Learning disabilities, literacy, and adult education (pp. 5–28). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., Boada, R., Riddle, M. W., Chhabildas, N., DeFries, J. C., & Pennington, B. F. (2011). Colorado learning difficulties questionnaire: Validation of a parent-report screening measure. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 778–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran

    Amir Azizi, Fazlollah Mir Drikvand & Mohamad Ali Sepahvandi

Authors
  1. Amir Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fazlollah Mir Drikvand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamad Ali Sepahvandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fazlollah Mir Drikvand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azizi, A., Drikvand, F.M. & Sepahvandi, M.A. Comparison of the Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation and Neurofeedback on Sustained Attention Among Elementary School Students with Specific Learning Disorder: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 43, 301–307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9410-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9410-8

Keywords

  • Cognitive rehabilitation
  • Neurofeedback
  • Sustained attention
  • Specific learning disorder