Advertisement

Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 49–56 | Cite as

Could White Coat Ocular Hypertension Affect to the Accuracy of the Diagnosis of Glaucoma? Relationships Between Anxiety and Intraocular Pressure in a Simulated Clinical Setting

  • Jorge Luis Méndez-Ulrich
  • Antoni Sanz
  • Albert Feliu-Soler
  • María Álvarez
  • Xavier Borràs
Article
  • 135 Downloads

Abstract

Sixty-one healthy subjects participated in a laboratory study carried out in a simulated clinical setting. Anticipatory anxiety-state was assessed at the arrival and immediately after, with no brief phase of adaptation, measurements of intraocular pressure, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were collected. At the end of the procedure, anxiety-trait was also assessed. Results suggest that high levels of both anxiety-state and anxiety-trait significantly predicted a clinically relevant increase of intraocular pressure. Anxiety-state mediated the relationship between anxiety-trait and intraocular pressure, which also was found to be related with heart rate but not related to both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. These results suggest a common mechanism of regulation underlying anxiogenic variability found on both intraocular pressure and heart rate. A reduction in parasympathetic activity appears as a possible mechanism underlying to this phenomenon. This anxiety-enhanced intraocular pressure could be considered a phenomenon analogous to white coat hypertension found in the measurement of blood pressure; therefore, it probably should be taken into account in the clinical context to prevent errors in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Further research on cognitive and emotional regulation of intraocular pressure is needed to best characterize this hypothetical phenomenon.

Keywords

Glaucoma Intraocular pressure Anxiety-state and trait White coat hypertension Cardiovascular reactivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Albert Feliu-Soler has a “Sara Borrell” research contract from the ISCIII (CD16/00147). Thanks to Carlos Lugo for his contribution to the linguistic revision.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Ethics Commission in Animal and Human Experimentation of the Autonomous University of Barcelona and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1992). Self-efficacy mechanism in psychobiologic functioning. In R. Swcharzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 355–394). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Bayés, R., Limonero, J. T., Barreto, P., & Comas, M. (1995). Assessing suffering. Lancet, 346(8988), 1492–1492.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brody, S., Erb, C., Veit, R., & Rau, H. (1999). Intraocular pressure changes: The influence of psychological stress and the Valsalva maneuver. Biological Psychology, 51(1), 43–57. Doi  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00012-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiquet, C., & Denis, P. (2004). The neuroanatomical and physiological bases of variations in intraocular pressure. Journal Français d’Ophtalmologie, 27(2), 2S11–2S18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Doshi, V., Ying-Lai, M., Azen, S. P., & Varma, R. (2008). Sociodemographic, family history, and lifestyle risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology, 115(4), 639–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitzpatrick, R., Gibbons, E., & Mackintosh, A. (2009). An overview of patient-reported outcome measures for people with anxiety and depression 2009. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Gomà-i-Freixanet, M., & Valero, S. (2008). Spanish normative data of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ) in a general population sample. Psicothema, 20(2), 318–324.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, S., Butlin, M., Lee, M., & Avolio, A. (2013). Central blood pressure, arterial waveform analysis, and vascular risk factors in glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma, 22(2), 98–103.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182254bc0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall, J. E., & Guyton, A. C. (2015). Textbook of medical physiology (15th Ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders.Google Scholar
  11. Kaluza, G., & Maurer, H. (1997). Stress and intraocular pressure in open angle glaucoma. Psychology & Health, 12(5), 667–675.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449708407413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaluza, G., Strempel, I., & Maurer, H. (1996). Stress reactivity of intraocular pressure after relaxation training in open-angle glaucoma patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 19(6), 587–598.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. La Batide-Alanore, A., Chatellier, G., Bobrie, G., Fofol, I., & Plouin, P. F. (2000). Comparison of nurse- and physician-determined clinic blood pressure levels in patients referred to a hypertension clinic: Implications for subsequent management. Journal of Hypertension, 18(4), 391–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Méndez-Ulrich, J. L., Casas, N., & Sanz, A. (2013). Hipertensión ocular de bata blanca: Un estudio piloto. Ansiedad y Estrés, 19(1), 41–51.Google Scholar
  15. Modi, N., Vahdani, K., & Booth, A. (2013). Glaucoma surgery. The Journal of Preoperative Practice, 21(1), 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Neymark, N., Buchholz, P., Honrubia, F., & Kobelt, G. (2008). The costs of treating glaucoma with combinations of topical drugs in Spain. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 18(1), 52–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Brien, E., Asmar, R., Beilin, L., Imai, Y., Mallion, J., Mancia, G., et al. (2003). European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. Journal of Hypertension, 21, 821–848.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000059016.82022.ca.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ogbuehi, K. C., & Almubrad, T. M. (2008). Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer. Optometry and Vision Science, 85(1), 61–66.  https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31815ed742.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pickering, T. G., Gerin, W., & Schwartz, A. R. (2002). What is the white-coat effect and how should it be measured? Blood Pressure Monitoring, 7(6), 293–300.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00126097-200212000-00001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, et al. (2005). Recommendations for blood pressure measurements in humans and experimental animals. Part 1: Blood pressure measurement I humans: A statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension, 45(1), 142–161.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000150859.47929.8e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pickering, T. G., James, G. D., Boddie, C., Harshfield, G. A., Blank, S., & Laragh, J. H. (1988). How Common Is White Coat Hypertension? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 259(2), 225–228.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03720020027031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pose-Reino, A., Rodríguez-Fernández, M., López-Barreiro, L., Coleman, I. C., Estévez-Núñez, J. C., & Méndez-Naya, I. (2002). Diagnostic criteria of white coat hypertension (WCH): Consequences for the implications of WCH for target organs. Blood Pressure, 11(3), 144–150.  https://doi.org/10.1080/080370502760050377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Quigley, H. A. (2011). Glaucoma. Lancet, 377(9774), 1367–1377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61423-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rotberg, M. H., & Surwit, R. S. (1981). Biofeedback techniques in the treatment of visual and ophthalmologic disorders. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 6(3), 375–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rotter, J. B. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(1), 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salvatore, S., Librando, A., Esposito, M., & Vingolo, E. M. (2001). The Mozart effect in biofeedback rehabilitation: A case report. Clinical Ophthalmology, 5, 1269–1272.  https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S23082.Google Scholar
  27. Sanz, A., & Villamarín, F. (2001). The role of perceived control in psychological reactivity: Self-efficacy and incentive value as regulators of cardiovascular adjustment. Biological Psychology, 56(3), 219–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00095-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanz, A., Villamarín, F., & Álvarez, M. (2006a). Effects of specific and non-specific perceived control on blood pressure in a stressful mental task. Biological Psychology, 71(1), 20–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.01.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanz, A., Villamarín, F., Álvarez, M., & Limonero, J. T. (2006b). Microanalysis of the relationship between self-efficacy and cardiovascular reactivity. A test for the moderating role of the incentive value and the mediating role of anxiety. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 66–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.01.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanz, A., Villamarín, F., Álvarez, M., & Torrubia, R. (2007). Sensitivity to punishment as a moderator of the relationship between self-efficacy and cardiovascular reactivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 143–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sauerborn, G., Schmitz, M., Franzen, U., & Florin, I. (1992). Stress and intraocular pressure in myopes. Psychology & Health, 6(1–2), 61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449208402022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shapiro, D., Jamner, L. D., Lane, J. D., Light, K. C., Myrtek, M., Sawada, Y., & Steptoe, A. (1996). Blood pressure publication guidelines. Psychophysiology, 33, 1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tham, Y. C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C. Y. (2014). Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology, 121(11), 2081–2090. Doi  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tuulonen, A., Airaksinen, P. J., Erola, E., Forsman, E., Friberg, K., Klemetti, et al. (2003). The Finish evidence-based guideline for open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica, 81(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ventura, L. M. (2009). Psychoneuroimmunology: Application to ocular diseases. Journal of Ocular Biology. Diseases and Informatics, 2(2), 84–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12177-009-9032-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Verdecchia, P., Staessen, J. A., White, W. B., Imai, Y., & O’Brien, E. T. (2002). Properly defining white coat hypertension. European Heart Journal, 23, 106–109.  https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2001.2657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Vogt, R., & Duncker, G. I. W. (2005). Anwendbarkeit der Selbsttonometrie unter ambulanten Bedingungen zur Gewinnung von Tagesprofilen des intraokularen Druckes. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 222(10), 814–821.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wallston, K. A. (1992). Hocus-Pocus, The focus isn’t strictly on locus: Rotter’s Social learning theory modified for health. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16(2), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson, M. R., Coleman, A. L., Yu, F., Sasaki, I. F., Bing, E. G., & Kim, M. H. (2002). Depression in patients with glaucoma as measured by self-report surveys. Ophthalmology, 109(5), 1018–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(02)00993-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamamoto, K., Sakamoto, Y., Irie, M., Ohmori, S., Yoshinari, M., & Kaçaniku, G. (2008). The relationship between IMPS-measured stress score and intraocular pressure among public school workers. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 27(1), 43–50.  https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.27.43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zuckerman, M. (2002) Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An alternative five-factor model. (Vol. Big five assessment (pp. 377–396). Seattle, WA: De Raad & M.Perugini.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group on Stress and Health, Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of PsychologyUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Teaching, Research & Innovation UnitParc Sanitari Sant Joan de DéuSt. Boi de LlobregatSpain
  3. 3.Primary Care Prevention and Health Promotion Research Network, RedIAPPMadridSpain
  4. 4.Office B5/045, Departament de Psicologia Bàsica, Evolutiva i de l’EducacióBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations