Impact of Biofeedback on Self-efficacy and Stress Reduction in Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
- 1.2k Downloads
Biofeedback application is an evidence-based technique to induce relaxation. A primary mechanism of action is the improvement of self-efficacy, which is needed to facilitate the translation of health behavioral intentions into action. Obesity is often associated with low self-efficacy and dysfunctional eating patterns, including comfort eating as an inexpedient relaxation technique. This is the first study investigating the effects of biofeedback on self-efficacy and relaxation in obesity. In the present experiment, 31 women, mean body mass index 35.5 kg/m², were randomized to a food-specific biofeedback paradigm, a non-specific relaxation biofeedback paradigm, or a waiting list control. Eight sessions of biofeedback of the electrodermal activity were performed while presenting either a challenging food stimulus or a non-specific landscape stimulus. Self-efficacy, stress, ability to relax, eating behavior, and electrodermal activity were assessed before, directly after, and 3 months after the intervention. The food-specific biofeedback predominantly showed effects on food-related self-efficacy and perceived stress. The non-specific relaxation biofeedback showed effects on the ability to relax. Self-reported improvements were confirmed by corresponding decrease in the electrodermal reaction to food stimuli. Biofeedback treatment is effective in improving self-efficacy in individuals with obesity and might therefore be a valuable additional intervention in obesity treatment.
KeywordsBiofeedback Obesity Self-efficacy Stress reduction Ability to relax Electrodermal activity
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fliege, H., Rose, M., Arck, P., Walter, O. B., Kocalevent, R. D., Weber, C., et al. (2005). The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: Validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(1), 78–88. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000151491.80178.78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Friederich, H. C., Kumari, V., Uher, R., Riga, M., Schmidt, U., Campbell, I. C., et al. (2006). Differential motivational responses to food and pleasurable cues in anorexia and bulimia nervosa: A startle reflex paradigm. Psychological Medicine, 36(9), 1327–1335. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fröhlich, M., Emrich, E., Pieter, A., & Stark, R. (2009). Outcome effects and effects sizes. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering, 03(03), 175–179.Google Scholar
- Glass, G. V., & Stanley, J. C. (1970). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewwod-Clifss, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Herderschee, R., Hay-Smith, E. J., Herbison, G. P., Roovers, J. P., & Heineman, M. J. (2011). Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7), CD009252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.
- Krampen, G. (2006). Änderungssensitive Symptomliste zu Entspannungserleben, Wohlbefinden, Beschwerden- und Problembelastungen (ASS-SYM). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Pudel, V., & Westenhoefer, J. (1989). Fragebogen zum Essverhalten (FEV), Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Rieber, N., Hilbert, A., Teufel, M., Giel, K. E., Warschburger, P., & Zipfel, S. (2010). Gewichtsstabilisierung nach Gewichtsreduktion. Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme zu Prädiktion und Intervention. Adipositas, 4(3), 115–124.Google Scholar
- Schwarzer, R., Schuz, B., Ziegelmann, J. P., Lippke, S., Luszczynska, A., & Scholz, U. (2007). Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(2), 156–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zijdenbos, I. L., de Wit, N. J., van der Heijden, G. J., Rubin, G., & Quartero, A. O. (2009). Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), CD006442. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006442.pub2.