Skip to main content

Personality and Electrodermal Response Lability: An Interpretation

Abstract

Electrodermal response (EDR) lability is a psychophysiological trait reflecting stable individual differences in electrodermal activation as indexed by frequency measures of phasic EDR activity. There is no consistent evidence that EDR lability reflects dispositional or clinical anxiety. However, EDR lability appears to be related to individual differences in the overt expression of emotional and antagonistic impulses. Greater EDR lability is associated with a relatively undemonstrative and agreeable disposition, whereas greater EDR stability is associated with a relatively expressive and antagonistic disposition. The inverse relationship between EDR lability and the expression of emotional and antagonistic impulses suggests that EDR lability may reflect individual differences in the effortful control of such expression. This hypothesis is consistent with cognitive effort interpretations of phasic EDR activity, with evidence of the sensitivity of phasic EDR activity to capacity-demanding tasks, and with evidence of reduced spare capacity among EDR labile individuals under cognitive challenge. Individual differences in effortful self-control may explain the association of greater EDR lability with essential hypertension and greater EDR stability with forms of antisocial behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Alexander, F. (1950). Psychosomatic medicine: Its principles and applications. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barger, S. D. (2002). The Marlowe-Crowne affair: Short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 286–305. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7902_11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birket-Smith, M., Hasle, N., & Jensen, H. H. (1993). Electrodermal activity in anxiety disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 88, 350–355. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03471.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. A. (1957). A study of affective responsiveness in a lie-detection situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 11–15. doi:10.1037/h0046624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (2002). Personality as an affect-processing system. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlin, G. (1976). Delayed habituation of the electrodermal orienting response as a function of increased level of arousal. Psychophysiology, 13, 345–351. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb03088.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 602–642). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. L., Beauchaine, T. P., & Sylvers, P. D. (2005). A comparison of psychophysiological and self-report measures of BAS and BIS activation. Psychophysiology, 42, 108–115. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00261.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, R., Miller, R. E., & Caul, W. F. (1974). Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of affect via facial expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 587–596. doi:10.1037/h0037041.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, R. W., Savin, V. J., Miller, R. E., & Caul, W. F. (1972). Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 362–371. doi:10.1037/h0033171.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Uchino, B. N., Crites, S. L., Snydersmith, M. A., Smith, G., Berntson, G. G., et al. (1992). Relationship between facial expressiveness and sympathetic activation in emotion: A critical review, with emphasis on modeling underlying mechanisms and individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 110–128. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.110.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (2005). Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 312–333. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (Eds.). (2002). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crider, A. (1993). Electrodermal response lability-stability: Individual difference correlates. In J. C. Roy, W. Boucsein, D. C. Fowles, & J. H. Gruzelier (Eds.), Progress in electrodermal research (pp. 173–186). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crider, A., Kremen, W. S., Xian, H., Jacobson, K., Waterman, B., Eisen, S. A., et al. (2004). Stability, consistency, and heritability of electrodermal response lability in middle-aged male twins. Psychophysiology, 41, 501–509. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00189.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, H. D. (2002). Electrodermal responses: What happens in the brain? The Neuroscientist, 8, 132–142.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, D. C. (2000). Electrodermal hyporeactivity and antisocial behavior: Does anxiety mediate the relationship? Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 177–189. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00336-0.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrikson, M., Edman, G., Levander, S. E., Schalling, D., Svensson, J., & Tuomisto, M. (1990). Electrodermal responsivity in young hypotensive and hypertensive men. Psychophysiology, 27, 649–655. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb03187.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H. E., & Richter, M. (2005). Ego involvement and effort: Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and performance effects. Psychophysiology, 42, 595–603. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00314.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman, I. I., & Hanson, D. R. (2005). Human development: Biological and genetic processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 263–286. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070208.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1981). Self-reported emotional disturbance and its relation to electrodermal reactivity, defensiveness and trait anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 47–52. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(81)90052-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, J. W., O’Neill, M., Dishman, J., & Webster, S. (1979). Electrodermal indices of public offending and recidivism. Biological Psychology, 9, 297–309. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(79)90029-2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn-Saric, R., McLeod, D. R., & Hipsley, P. (1995). Is hyperarousal essential to obsessive-compulsive disorder? Diminished physiologic flexibility, but not hyperarousal, characterizes patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 688–693.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn-Saric, R., McLeod, D. R., & Zimmerli, W. D. (1989). Somatic manifestations in women with generalized anxiety disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 1113–1119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hustmyer, F. E., & Karnes, E. (1964). Background autonomic activity and “analytic perception”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 467–468. doi:10.1037/h0042711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iocono, W. G. (1998). Identifying psychophysiological risk for psychopathology: Examples from substance abuse and schizophrenia research. Psychophysiology, 35, 621–637. doi:10.1017/S0048577298980489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamner, L. D., Shapiro, D., Hui, K. K., Oakley, M. E., & Lovett, M. (1993). Hostility and differences between clinic, self-determined, and ambulatory blood pressure. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 203–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, H. H., Hasle, N., & Birket-Smith, M. (1996). Electrodermal lability in anxiety disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 103–108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1996.tb00643.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. E. (1935). The galvanic skin reflex as related to overt emotional expression. The American Journal of Psychology, 47, 241–251. doi:10.2307/1415828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. E. (1950). The study of patterns of emotional expression. In M. L. Reymert (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The mooseheart symposium (pp. 161–168). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. E. (1960). The longitudinal method in the study of personality. In R. Iscoe & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Personality development in children (pp. 3–25). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R. S., Johnson, B. T., Kolodziej, M. E., & Schreer, G. E. (1996). Elevated blood pressure and personality: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 293–320. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.293.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamas, A. D., Gruber, A. L., & Rypma, B. (1999). Autonomic physiological activity in mental rotation tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 211–214. doi:10.2466/PMS.88.1.211-214.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, R. M. (1991). Electrodermal lability and myocardial reactivity to stress. Psychophysiology, 28, 619–631. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb01005.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlisch, O., & Schaefer, F. (1996). Physiological changes during computer tasks: Responses to mental load or to motor demands? Ergonomics, 39, 213–224. doi:10.1080/00140139608964452.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronholm, E., Hyyppa, M. T., Jula, A., & Toikka, T. (1996). Electrodermal lability and hypertension. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 129–136. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(96)00044-X.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I., & Lacey, B. C. (1958). The relationship of resting autonomic activity to motor impulsivity. Proceedings of the Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 36, 144–209.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lader, M. H., & Wing, L. (1966). Physiological measures, sedative drugs, and morbid anxiety. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, C. (1932). An attempt to measure emotional traits in juvenile delinquency. In K. S. Lashley (Ed.), Studies in the dynamics of behavior (pp. 265–326). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzetta, J. T., & Kleck, R. E. (1970). Encoding and decoding of nonverbal affect in humans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 12–19. doi:10.1037/h0029850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, M. F. (2004). The psychophysiology of aggression, psychopathy, and conduct problems: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 531–552. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.531.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T., Iacono, W. G., Haroian, K., McGue, M., & Bouchard, T. J. (1988). Habituation of the skin conductance response to strong stimuli: A twin study. Psychophysiology, 25, 4–15. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb00949.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. J., & James, G. D. (1998). Defensiveness and essential hypertension. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 45, 139–148. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00293-6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, I. B., Wilhelm, F. H., & Gross, J. J. (2003). Autonomic recovery and habituation in social anxiety. Psychophysiology, 40, 648–653. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00066.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. D. (1971). Personality correlates of response tendencies during habituation of the galvanic skin response. Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 6690–6691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy-Castle, A. C., & McKiever, B. L. (1953). The psychophysiological significance of the galvanic skin response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 15–24. doi:10.1037/h0060100.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. T. (2003). Response inhibition and disruptive behaviors: Toward a multiprocess conception of etiological heterogeneity for ADHD combined type and conduct disorder early-onset type. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008, 170–182. doi:10.1196/annals.1301.018.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notarius, C. I., & Levenson, R. W. (1979). Expressive tendencies and physiological response to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1204–1210. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1204.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman, J. G. (1983). Habituation and personality. In A. Gale & J. A. Edwards (Eds.), Physiological correlates of human behavior (pp. 45–61). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman, J. G., & Lloyd, J. E. M. (1988). Electrodermal lability and dichotic listening. Psychophysiology, 25, 538–546. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb01889.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention, and learning: An information-processing perspective. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. Van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 443–471). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., Hamm, A., & Hugdahl, K. (2000). Cognition and the autonomic nervous system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 533–575). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. C., Ungerleider, L. G., & Bandettini, P. A. (2002). Task-independent functional brain activity correlation with skin conductance changes: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 17, 1797–1806. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1306.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauls, C. A., & Stemmler, G. (2003). Repressive and defensive coping during fear and anger. Emotion, 3, 284–302. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.284.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., & Caspi, A. (1999). Behavioral genetics and personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 251–276). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A. (1997). Antisocial behavior and psychophysiology: A biosocial perspective and a prefrontal dysfunction hypothesis. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 289–304). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., & Venables, P. H. (1984). Electrodermal nonresponding, antisocial behavior, and schizoid tendencies in adolescents. Psychophysiology, 21, 424–433. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb00221.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., Venables, P. H., & Williams, M. (1995). High autonomic arousal and electrodermal orienting at age 15 years as protective factors against criminal behavior at age 29 years. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1595–1600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2006). Personality and emotional memory: How regulating emotion impairs memory for emotional event. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 631–651. doi:10.1016/j.jrp. 2005.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1996). Resiliant, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 157–171. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.157.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., & Posner, M. L. (2004). Temperament and self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 357–370). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalling, D., Lidberg, L., Levander, S. E., & Dahlin, Y. (1973). Spontaneous autonomic activity as related to psychopathy. Biological Psychology, 1, 83–97. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(73)90001-X.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schell, A. M., Dawson, M. E., & Filion, D. L. (1988). Psychophysiological correlates of electrodermal lability. Psychophysiology, 25, 619–632. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb01899.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulter, G., & Papousek, I. (1992). Bilateral electrodermal activity: Reliability, laterality and individual differences. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 199–213. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(92)90070-R.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., & Kelsey, R. M. (1992). Effects of self-deception, social desirability, and repressive coping on psychophysiological reactivity to stress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 616–624. doi:10.1177/0146167292185012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1994). Neuroanatomical correlates of electrodermal skin conductance responses. Psychophysiology, 31, 427–438. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01046.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. A., Schwartz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 369–380. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.88.4.369.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitkunat, R., Buhrer, M., & Sparrer, B. (1990). Cortical initiation of phasic electrodermal activity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 303–314. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(90)90062-I.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, F. H., Trabert, W., & Roth, W. T. (2001). Physiologic instability in panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 596–605. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01000-3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. M., Brammer, M. J., Skerrett, D., Lagopolous, J., Rennie, C., Kozek, K., et al. (2000). The neural correlates of orienting: An integration of fMRI and skin conductance orienting. Neuro Report, 11, 3011–3015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, L. L., Liu, K., Matthews, K. A., Daviglus, M. L., Ferguson, T. F., & Kiefe, C. I. (2003). Psychosocial factors and risk of hypertension: The coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 2138–2148. doi:10.1001/jama.290.16.2138.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, T. P., Leonard, H. L., Swedo, S. E., & Rapoport, J. L. (1996). Autonomic activity in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 60, 67–76. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(95)02846-3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H., Vossel, G., & Frohlich, W. D. (1990). Individual differences in resting heart rate and spontaneous electrodermal activity as predictors of attentional processes: Effects on anticipatory heart rate deceleration and task performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 8, 249–259. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(90)90016-7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to Phebe Cramer, Bruce Dumouchel, and Doil Montgomery for helpful critiques of earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Crider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crider, A. Personality and Electrodermal Response Lability: An Interpretation. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 33, 141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-008-9057-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-008-9057-y

Keywords

  • Electrodermal activity
  • Emotion regulation
  • Effortful control
  • Agreeableness
  • Antisocial behavior