Advertisement

Pedobacter changchengzhani sp. nov., isolated from soil of Antarctica

  • Rui-Han He
  • Zhen-Wei Liu
  • Yong Yu
  • Hui-Rong LiEmail author
  • Zong-Jun DuEmail author
Original Paper
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

A Gram-negative, aerobic, non-motile, pink and rod-shaped bacterium, designated E01020T, was isolated from soil collected from the Chinese Great Wall Station, Antarctica. Comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain E01020T is a member of the genus Pedobacter, related to Pedobacter alluvionis DSM 19624T (96.8% similarity), Pedobacter agri JCM 15120T (96.5% similarity) and Pedobacter chinensis JDX94T (96.3% similarity). The dDDH values and ANI values of strain E01020T with closely related strains indicate that it can be distinguished from them as a novel species. The DNA G+C content was determined to be 35.2 mol%. The growth of strain E01020T was observed at 4–25 °C (optimal 20 °C), in the presence of 0–1% NaCl (w/v, optimal 0%) and at pH 6.0–8.0 (optimal pH 7.0). Strain E01020T was found to contained menaquinon-7 (MK-7) as only respiratory quinone, iso-C15:0, iso-C17:0 3-OH and Summed feature 3 (C16:1ω6c and/or C16:1ω7c) as major fatty acids. The major polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, one unidentified lipid and two unidentified aminolipids. On the basis of the results of the phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses, it was suggested that strain E01020T represents a novel species of the genus Pedobacter, for which the name Pedobacter changchengzhani sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is E01020T (= KCTC 62990T = MCCC 1H00357T).

Keywords

Pedobacter changchengzhani Chinese Great Wall Station Polyphasic taxonomy 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the funding from National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1406903), Science and Technology Basic Resources Investigation Program of China (2017FY100300) and the SOA Key Laboratory for Polar Science, Polar Research Institute of China (KP201705).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal experiments by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

10482_2019_1305_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1275 kb)

References

  1. Baik KS, Park YD, Kim MS, Park SC, Moon EY, Rhee MS, Choi JH, Seong CN (2007) Pedobacter koreensis sp. nov., isolated from fresh water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2079–2083CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M (2001) GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. CLSI (2018) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 28th edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, WayneGoogle Scholar
  4. Da X, Jiang F, Chang X, Ren L, Qiu X, Kan W, Zhang Y, Deng S, Fang C, Peng F (2015) Pedobacter ardleyensis sp. nov., isolated from soil in Antarctica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:3841–3846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong XZ, Cai MY (2001) Determinative manual for routine bacteriology. Scientific Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  6. Farfán M, Montes MJ, Marqués AM et al (2014) Reclassification of Sphingobacterium antarcticum Shivaji et al. 1992 as Pedobacter antarcticus comb. nov. and Pedobacter piscium (Takeuchi and Yokota 1993) Steyn et al. 1998 as a later heterotypic synonym of Pedobacter antarcticus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:863–868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution (NY) 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitch WM (1971) Towards defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree toplogy. Syst Biol 20:406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallego V (2006) Pedobacter aquatilis sp. nov., isolated from drinking water, and emended description of the genus Pedobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1853–1858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordon NS, Valenzuela A, Adams SM, Ramsey PW, Pollock JL, Holben WE, Gannon JE (2009) Pedobacter nyackensis sp. nov., Pedobacter alluvionis sp. nov. and Pedobacter borealis sp. nov., isolated from Montana flood-plain sediment and forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:1720–1726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Klappenbach JA, Goris J, Vandamme P, Coenye T, Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM (2007) DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kroppenstedt RM (1982) Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 5:2359–2367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu QQ, Wang Y, Li J, Du ZJ, Chen GJ (2014) Saccharicrinis carchari sp. nov., isolated from a shark, and emended descriptions of the genus Saccharicrinis and Saccharicrinis fermentans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:2204–2209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lowe TM, Eddy SR (1997) tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M (2013) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform 14:60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M, Schaal A, Parlett JH (1984) An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 2:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mu DS, Liang QY, Wang XM, Lu DC, Shi MJ, Chen GJ, Du ZJ (2018) Metatranscriptomic and comparative genomic insights into resuscitation mechanisms during enrichment culturing. Microbiome 6:230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Qiu X, Qu Z, Jiang F, Ren L, Chang X, Kan W, Fang C, Peng F (2014) Pedobacter huanghensis sp. nov. and Pedobacter glacialis sp. nov., isolated from Arctic glacier foreland. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:2431–2436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Roh SW, Quan Z-X, Nam Y-D, Chang H-W, Kim K-H, Kim M-K, Im W-T, Jin L, Kim S-H, Lee S-T, Bae J-W (2008) Pedobacter agri sp. nov., from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1640–1643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evolut 4:406–425Google Scholar
  23. Sasser M (2001) Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. Midi Tech Note 101Google Scholar
  24. Smibert RM, Krieg NR (1994) Phenotypic characterization. In: Gerbardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR (eds) Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Sociey for Microbiology, Washington, pp 607–654Google Scholar
  25. Steyn PL, Segers P, Vancanneyt M, Sandra P, Kersters K, Joubert JJ (1998) Classification of heparinolytic bacteria into a new genus, Pedobacter, comprising four species: Pedobacter heparinus comb. nov., Pedobacter piscium comb. nov., Pedobacter africanus sp. nov. and Pedobacter saltans sp. nov. proposal of the family Sphingobacteriaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:165–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Švec P, Králová S, Busse HJ, Kleinhagauer T, Pantůček R, Mašlaňová I, Cnockaert M, Vandamme P, Staňková E, Gelbíčová T, Holochová P, Barták M, Kýrová K, Sedláček I (2017) Pedobacter jamesrossensis sp. nov., Pedobacter lithocola sp. nov., Pedobacter mendelii sp. nov. and Pedobacter petrophilus sp. nov., isolated from the Antarctic environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1499–1507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tindall B, Sikorski J, Smibert R, Krieg N (2007) Phenotypic characterization and theprinciples of comparative systematics. Methods for general and molecular microbiology, 3rd edn. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp 330–393Google Scholar
  28. Xia HF, Li XL, Liu QQ, Miao TT, Du ZJ, Chen GJ (2013) Salegentibacter echinorum sp. nov., isolated from the sea urchin Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104:315–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J (2017) A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:1281–1286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang B, Liu ZQ, Zheng YG (2018) Pedobacter quisquiliarum sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:438–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhou Z, Jiang F, Wang S, Peng F, Dai J, Li W, Fang C (2012) Pedobacter arcticus sp. nov., a facultative psychrophile isolated from Arctic soil, and emended descriptions of the genus Pedobacter, Pedobacter heparinus, Pedobacter daechungensis, Pedobacter terricola, Pedobacter glucosidilyticus and Pedobacter lentus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:1963–1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou LY, Chen XY, Du ZJ, Mu D (2019) Pedobacter chinensis sp. nov., a cellulose-decomposing bacterium from Arctic tundra soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:1926–1933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Marine ScienceShandong UniversityWeihaiChina
  2. 2.Polar Research Institute of ChinaMinistry of Natural ResourcesShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations