Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 99, Issue 1, pp 13–23 | Cite as

Phylogeny of the ascomycetous yeasts and the renaming of Pichia anomala to Wickerhamomyces anomalus

Review Paper

Abstract

In this review, the phylogeny of the ascomycetous yeasts is discussed, with emphasis on the genus Pichia and its synonym Hansenula. The genus Pichia, as defined from phenotype, had nearly 100 assigned species, but the number of species has been reduced to 20 following phylogenetic circumscription on Pichia membranifaciens, the type species of the genus. The remaining species of Pichia have been reassigned to 20 different genera, many of which are newly described, such as Wickerhamomyces. The reason for reclassification of Pichia anomala in the genus Wickerhamomyces is discussed.

Keywords

Pichia anomala Wickerhamomyces anomalus Biocontrol yeasts Phylogeny 

References

  1. Bedford CL (1942) A taxonomic study of the genus Hansenula. Mycologia 34:628–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai J, Roberts IN, Collins D (1996) Phylogenetic relationships among members of the ascomycetous yeast genera Brettanomyces, Debaryomyces, Dekkera and Kluyveromyces deduced by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46:542–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniel HM, Meyer W (2003) Evaluation of ribosomal RNA and actin gene sequences for the identification of ascomycetous yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 86:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fell JW, Boekhout T, Fonseca A, Scorzetti G, Statzell-Tallman A (2000) Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:1351–1371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer B, Brebeck C (1894) Zur Morphologie, Biologie, und Systematik der Kahmpilze, der Monilia candida Hansen und des Soorerregers. C. Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME, Stajich JE, Butler G (2006) A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol 6:99–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gellissen G (2002) Hansenula polymorpha: biology and applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag, GmbH, Weinheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Groth C, Hansen J, Piškur J (1999) A natural chimeric yeast containing genetic material from three species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:1933–1938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen EC (1891) Sur la germination des spores chez les Saccharomyces. Ann Micrographic 3:449–474Google Scholar
  10. Hansen EC (1904) Grundlinien zur Systematik der Saccharomyceten. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd., Abt. II 12:529–538Google Scholar
  11. James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, Cox CJ, Celio G, Gueidan C, Fraker E, Miadlikowska J, Lumbsch HT, Rauhut A, Reeb V, Arnold AE, Amtoft A, Stajich JE, Hosaka K, Sung GH, Johnson D, O’Rourke B, Crockett M, Binder M, Curtis JM, Slot JC, Wang Z, Wilson AW, Schüssler A, Longcore JE, O’Donnell K, Mozley-Standridge S, Porter D, Letcher PM, Powell MJ, Taylor JW, White MM, Griffith GW, Davies DR, Humber RA, Morton JB, Sugiyama J, Rossman AY, Rogers JD, Pfister DH, Hewitt D, Hansen K, Hambleton S, Shoemaker RA, Kohlmeyer J, Volkmann-Kohlmeyer B, Spotts RA, Serdani M, Crous PW, Hughes KW, Matsuura K, Langer E, Langer G, Untereiner WA, Lücking R, Büdel B, Geiser DM, Aptroot A, Diederich P, Schmitt I, Schultz M, Yahr R, Hibbett DS, Lutzoni F, McLaughlin DJ, Spatafora JW, Vilgalys R (2006) Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature 443:818–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Ainsworth & Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi, 10th edn. CABI International, Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurtzman CP (1984) Synonymy of the yeast genera Hansenula and Pichia demonstrated through comparisons of deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 50:209–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurtzman CP (1998) Pichia E.C. Hansen emend. Kurtzman. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (eds) The yeasts, A taxonomic study, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 273–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (1998) Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73:331–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (2003) Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the ‘Saccharomyces complex’ determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res 3:417–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (2007) Multigene phylogenetic analysis of the Trichomonascus, Wickerhamiella and Zygoascus yeast clades, and the proposal of Sugiyamaella gen.nov. and 14 new species combinations. FEMS Yeast Res 7:141–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (2010) Systematics of methanol assimilating yeasts and neighboring taxa from multigene sequence analysis and the proposal of Peterozyma gen. nov. FEMS Yeast Res 10:353–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurtzman CP, Suzuki M (2010) Phylogenetic analysis of ascomycete yeasts that form coenzyme Q-9 and the proposal of the new genera Babjeviella, Meyerozyma, Millerozyma, Priceomyces and Scheffersomyces. Mycoscience 51:2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurtzman CP, Lachance MA, Nguyen HV, Prillinger H (2001) Proposal to conserve the name Kluyveromyces with a conserved type (Ascomycota: Hemiascomycetes, Saccharomycetaceae). Taxon 50:907–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, Basehoar-Powers E (2008) Relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene phylogenetic analysis and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov. FEMS Yeast Res 8:939–954CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu Z, Kurtzman CP (1991) Phylogenetic relationships among species of Williopsis and Saturnospora gen. nov. as determined from partial rRNA sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 60:21–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lodder J, Kreger-van Rij NJW (1952) The yeasts, A taxonomic study. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  24. Minter DM (2009) Cyberlindnera, a replacement name for Lindnera Kurtzman et al., nom. illegit. Mycotaxon 110:473–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson SW, Kurtzman CP (1991) Ribosomal RNA sequence divergence among sibling species of yeasts. Syst Appl Microbiol 14:124–129Google Scholar
  26. Price CW, Fuson GB, Phaff HJ (1978) Genome comparison in yeast systematics: delimitation of species within the genera Schwanniomyces, Saccharomyces, Debaryomyces and Pichia. Microbiol Rev 42:161–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sydow H, Sydow P (1919) Mykologische Mitteilungen. Ann Mycol 17:33–47Google Scholar
  28. Vaughan-Martini A, Martini A (1998) Saccharomyces Meyen ex Reess. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (eds) The yeasts, A taxonomic study, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 358–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. von Nägeli C (1879) Theorie der Gährung. Ein Beitrag zur Molekularphysiologie. MünchenGoogle Scholar
  30. Wickerham LJ (1951) Taxonomy of yeasts. Techn Bull 1029. US Dept Agr, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Wickerham LJ (1970) Hansenula H. et P. Sydow. In: Lodder J (ed) The yeasts, A taxonomic study, 2nd edn. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 226–315Google Scholar
  32. Yamada Y, Maeda K, Mikata K (1994) The phylogenetic relationships of the hat-shaped ascospore-forming, nitrate-assimilating Pichia species, formerly classified in the genus Hansenula Sydow et Sydow, based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Saccharomycetaceae): the proposals of three new genera, Ogataea, Kuraishia, and Nakazawaea. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 58:1245–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yamada Y, Matsuda M, Maeda K, Mikata K (1995) The phylogenetic relationships of methanol-assimilating yeasts based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs: the proposal of Komagataella gen. nov. (Saccharomycetaceae). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59:439–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© U.S. Government 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens and Mycology Research UnitNational Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgriculturePeoriaUSA

Personalised recommendations