Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible supply-demand matching mechanism for C2B crowdsourcing logistics platforms with heterogeneous environment-inclined merchants

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Customer-to-Business (C2B) crowdsourcing logistics presents a viable solution to the last-mile delivery problem in e-retailing, offering new prospects for sustainable supply chains. In response to this trend, some digital online platforms have introduced eco-friendly delivery vehicles and launched green delivery services. However, merchants on the demand side often exhibit heterogeneous environmental inclinations, significantly affecting their preferences and choices for delivery vehicle types. To address this, this paper proposes a novel dual-system design comprising two parallel and independent matching systems, aiming to accommodate merchants’ diverse preferences through a flexible supply-demand matching mechanism. We subsequently develop a supply allocation optimization model for the platform based on queuing analysis and derive the optimal driver allocation strategy that maximizes platform profitability. A key finding is that market and individual environmental awareness exert opposite effects on the platform’s optimal allocation decision. Our proposed dual-system design achieves a harmonious balance between reducing carbon emissions and enhancing profitability, resulting in a 13.3% reduction in platform carbon emissions and a 17.7% increase in profits in the baseline scenario. Interestingly, government environmental propaganda may not necessarily contribute to reducing platform carbon emissions unless complementary measures are implemented to control excessive environmental premiums associated with green delivery vehicles. Our study provides valuable insights for promoting the behavioral operations management of crowdsourcing logistics platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For details, see at https://sf-cityrush.com/.

  2. For details, see at https://www.imdada.cn/.

  3. For details, see at http://www.ishansong.com/.

  4. SF Intra-city: 2022 Environmental, Social, and Governance Report. For detailed information, refer to https://ir.sf-cityrush.com/media/gycg2m3w/cn2022esg.pdf.

  5. For details, see at https://sf-cityrush.com/about/.

  6. Bank of Communications International: Instant Retail has Doubled in Space, Third-Party Instant Delivery Seizes Market Share; First Buy Ratings for SF Intra-city and Dada Express. For details, see at https://www.doc88.com/p-79099228517117.html.

  7. Huachuang Securities: Grasp the ’Double Dividend’ and Achieve High Growth—Decoding the Series of Shunfeng. For details, see at https://www.doc88.com/p-73673252474551.html?r=1.

  8. LeadLeo: 2022 China Instant Delivery Industry Research. For details, see at https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202302141583147240_1.pdf?1676404577000.pdf.

  9. For details, see at https://www.sf-cityrush.com/.

  10. China Automotive Technology and Research Centre: China Automotive Low Carbon Action Plan Research Report 2021. For details, see details at http://www.catarc.info/news/11514.cshtml.

  11. China Chain Store & Franchise Association: China Instant Retail Development Report 2022. For details, see at http://www.ccfa.org.cn/portal/cn/xiangxi.jsp?id=444050 &type=33.

References

  • Alnaggar, A., Gzara, F., & Bookbinder, J. H. (2021). Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature. Omega, 98, 102139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archetti, C., Savelsbergh, M., & Speranza, M. G. (2016). The vehicle routing problem with occasional drivers. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(2), 472–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, A. M., Agatz, N., Kroon, L., & Zuidwijk, R. (2019). Crowdsourced delivery-a dynamic pickup and delivery problem with ad hoc drivers. Transportation Science, 53(1), 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., Riquelme, C., & Johari, R. (2015). Pricing in ride-share platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Available at SSRN 2568258.

  • Behrend, M., & Meisel, F. (2018). The integration of item-sharing and crowdshipping: Can collaborative consumption be pushed by delivering through the crowd? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 111, 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calza, F., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2016). Corporate ownership and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayarian, I., & Savelsbergh, M. (2020). Crowdshipping and same-day delivery: Employing in-store customers to deliver online orders. Production and Operations Management, 29(9), 2153–2174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devari, A., Nikolaev, A. G., & He, Q. (2017). Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 105, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L., Zhou, L., Gupta, A., Zhong, J., Zhu, Z., Tan, K.-C., & Qin, K. (2019). Solving generalized vehicle routing problem with occasional drivers via evolutionary multitasking. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 51(6), 3171–3184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gdowska, K., Viana, A., & Pedroso, J. P. (2018). Stochastic last-mile delivery with crowdshipping. Transportation Research Procedia, 30, 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, M., Liao, X., Liu, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Consumer preference analysis: A data-driven multiple criteria approach integrating online information. Omega, 96, 102074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, X., Jaramillo, Y. J. L., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J., & Claassen, G. (2019). On integrating crowdsourced delivery in last-mile logistics: A simulation study to quantify its feasibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, H., Chen, W., Wang, S., Li, S., Ma, F., & Sun, Q. (2023). Green power pricing and matching efficiency optimization for peer-to-peer trading platforms considering heterogeneity of supply and demand sides. Annals of Operations Research, 1–24.

  • Hong, J. H., & Liu, X. (2022). The optimal pricing for green ride services in the ride-sharing economy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 104, 103205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafle, N., Zou, B., & Lin, J. (2017). Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 99, 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, J., Cen, X., Yang, H., Chen, X., & Ye, J. (2019). Modelling drivers’ working and recharging schedules in a ride-sourcing market with electric vehicles and gasoline vehicles. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 160–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Li, Y., Lu, W., & Huang, J. (2020). Crowdsourcing logistics pricing optimization model based on DBSCAN clustering algorithm. IEEE Access, 8, 92615–92626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Y., & Wu, L. (2023). Research on pricing strategy of crowdsourcing logistics based on governmental policy regulation. Operations Research and Management Science, 32(1), 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-L., Cheah, J.-H., Azali, M., Ho, J. A., & Yip, N. (2019). Does firm size matter? Evidence on the impact of the green innovation strategy on corporate financial performance in the automotive sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 974–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macrina, G., Di Puglia Pugliese, L., Guerriero, F., & Laganà, D. (2017). The vehicle routing problem with occasional drivers and time windows. In Optimization and decision science: Methodologies and applications: ODS, Sorrento, Italy, September 4–7, 2017 (Vol. 47, pp. 577–587). Springer.

  • Özkan, P., Süer, S., Keser, İK., & Kocakoç, İD. (2020). The effect of service quality and customer satisfaction on customer loyalty: The mediation of perceived value of services, corporate image, and corporate reputation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(2), 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patella, S. M., Grazieschi, G., Gatta, V., Marcucci, E., & Carrese, S. (2020). The adoption of green vehicles in last mile logistics: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(1), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourrahmani, E., & Jaller, M. (2021). Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 78, 101063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punel, A., & Stathopoulos, A. (2017). Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 105, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, W., Li, L., Liu, S., & Shen, Z.-J.M. (2018). Shared mobility for last-mile delivery: Design, operational prescriptions, and environmental impact. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 20(4), 737–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., & Yan, J. (2021). CEO hometown identity and firm green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 756–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Teunter, R. H., Hua, G., & Wu, T. (2020). Taxi-hailing platforms: Inform or assign drivers? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 142, 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., Guo, P., Tang, C. S., & Wang, Y. (2021). Gender-related operational issues arising from on-demand ride-hailing platforms: Safety concerns and system configuration. Production and Operations Management, 30(10), 3481–3496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, F., Gendreau, M., & Rei, W. (2022). Crowdshipping: An open VRP variant with stochastic destinations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 140, 103677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, M. W., & Savelsbergh, M. (2020). Workforce scheduling in the era of crowdsourced delivery. Transportation Science, 54(4), 1113–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Chen, Y., & Jiang, S. (2020). Optimal pricing for crowdsourcing logistics socialized services under competitive platforms. Operations Research and Management Science, 29(10), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Wang, H., & Jiang, S. (2019). Surge pricing optimization of crowdsourcing logistics service based on sharing economy. In 2019 international conference on industrial engineering and systems management (IESM) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  • Yang, C., Guo, L., & Zhou, S. X. (2022). Customer satisfaction, advertising competition, and platform performance. Production and Operations Management, 31(4), 1576–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, B., & Savelsbergh, M. (2019). Service and capacity planning in crowd-sourced delivery. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 100, 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J., Li, Y., Tian, H., Tao, X., & Hou, X. (2023a). Research status and development trend of crowdsourcing delivery. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1369.U.20230710.1949.002.html.

  • Zhao, M., Li, B., Ren, J., & Hao, Z. (2023b). Competition equilibrium of ride-sourcing platforms and optimal government subsidies considering customers’ green preference under peak carbon dioxide emissions. International Journal of Production Economics, 255, 108679.

  • Zhen, L., Wu, Y., Wang, S., & Yi, W. (2021). Crowdsourcing mode evaluation for parcel delivery service platforms. International Journal of Production Economics, 235, 108067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Y., Lan, Y., Chen, Z., & Yang, J. (2023). On-demand ride-hailing platforms with heterogeneous quality-sensitive customers: Dedicated system or pooling system? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 173, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the generous financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72374187, 72104034), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by SAST (20240123), Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (21YJC630037, 22XJC910001), Science and Technology Planning Project of Shaanxi Province, China (2024JC-YBMS-595), USTC Research Funds of the Double First-Class Initiative (YD2160002002), and Carbon Neutral Science and Technology Foundation of University of Science and Technology of China (YD2040002016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haonan He.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Li, S., He, H. et al. Flexible supply-demand matching mechanism for C2B crowdsourcing logistics platforms with heterogeneous environment-inclined merchants. Ann Oper Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05977-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05977-8

Keywords

Navigation