Abstract
This study examines the integrity of financial statements within the Romanian gambling and betting industry, employing Benford's, Zipf’s and Universal Law and distribution distances tests. Data from the financial statements of active gambling and betting companies in 2013, classified under NACE code 9200, were analysed The primary focus was on the absolute values of declared gross profit or loss. Our analysis involved visual inspections, Chi-square tests, and the application of Zipf’s and Universal laws for distribution conformity. Results indicated that the empirical distributions of the first and second digits, as well as the combined first two digits of gross profit or loss, align with Benford's Law. Surprisingly, the distribution did not conform to the expected Zipf’s type but instead followed the specific pattern of the Universal law. Furthermore, while the Zipf’s model was not a fit, the Universal law effectively captured the distribution of the reported financial data, suggesting a power-law concentration of gross profit values in the industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, M. W., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. A. (2014). Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden: Changes between 1998 and 2009. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(4), 985–999.
Arezzo, M. F., & Cerqueti, R. (2023). A Benford’s law view of inspections’ reasonability. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 632, 129294.
Ausloos, M., & Cerqueti, R. (2016). A universal rank-size law. PLoS ONE, 11(11), e0166011.
Ausloos, M., Herteliu, C., & Ileanu, B. (2015). Breakdown of Benford’s law for birth data. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 419, 736–745.
Axtell, R. L. (2001). Zipf distribution of US firm sizes. Science, 293(5536), 1818–1820.
Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 551–572.
Cerqueti, R., & Ausloos, M. (2015). Evidence of economic regularities and disparities of Italian regions from aggregated tax income size data. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 421, 187–207.
Clotfelter C. T., & Ph. T., Cook, (1989). The demand for lottery products. In NBER Working Paper, No. 2928. Accessed 9th September, 2020. https://www.nber.org/papers/w2928.pdf.
Derevensky, J. L., & Gainsbury, S. M. (2016). Social casino gaming and adolescents: Should we be concerned and is regulation in sight? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry., 44, 1–6.
Durtschi, C., Hillison, W., & Pacini, C. (2004). The effective use of Benford’s law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5(1), 17–34.
Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2012). Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1662–1665.
Falk, P., & Maenpaa, P. (1999). Hitting the jackpot: Lives of lottery millionaires. Berg Pub Limited.
Ficcadenti, V., Cerqueti, R., & Varde’i, C. H. (2023). A rank-size approach to analyse soccer competitions and teams: The case of the Italian football league “Serie A.” Annals of Operations Research, 325(1), 85–113.
Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviours, 28(3), 769–779.
Georgescu, F., Cozmanca, B. O., & Cazacu, A. M. (2020). Fiscal and income incentives trigger imbalances in a partly functional market economy. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research. https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/54.2.20.01
Goodwin, B. C., Browne, M., Rockloff, M., & Rose, J. (2017). A typical problem gambler affects six others. International Gambling Studies, 17(2), 276–289.
Hansen, M., & Rossow, I. (2010). Limited cash flow on slot machines: Effects of prohibition of note acceptors on adolescent gambling behaviour. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 70–81.
Iorliam, A., Ho, A. T., Poh, N., Tirunagari, S., & Bours, P. (2015). Data forensic techniques using Benford's law and Zipf's law for keystroke dynamics. In 3rd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF 2015) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Iorliam, A., & Iorliam, A. (2019). Natural laws (Benford’s law and Zipf’s law) for network traffic analysis. In Cybersecurity in Nigeria: A Case Study of Surveillance and Prevention of Digital Crime, 3–22.
Jianu, I., Jianu, I., Ileanu, B. V., Nedelcu, M. V., & Herteliu, C. (2014). The Value Relevance of Financial Reporting in Romania. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 48(4).
Kafri, O. (2023). Zipf’s law, Benford’s law, and Pareto rule. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 13(3), 174–180.
Margellou, A. G., & Pomonis, P. J. (2020). Benford’s law, Zipf’s law and the pore properties in solids. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 292, 109735.
Marshall, K. (1998). The gambling industry: Raising the stakes. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 10(4), 7–11.
Mir, T. A., Ausloos, M., & Cerqueti, R. (2014). Benford’s law predicted digit distribution of aggregated income taxes: The surprising conformity of Italian cities and regions. The European Physical Journal B, 87(11), 261.
Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1), 39–40.
Nigrini, M. J. (1999). I’ve got your number. Journal of Accountancy, 187(5), 79–83.
Nigrini, M. J. (2015). Persistent patterns in stock returns, stock volumes, and accounting data in the US capital markets. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(4), 541–557.
Pietronero, L., Tosatti, E., Tosatti, V., & Vespignani, A. (2001). Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: The laws of Benford and Zipf. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 293(1–2), 297–304.
Reed, W. J. (2001). The Pareto, Zipf and other power laws. Economics Letters, 74(1), 15–19.
Schüll, N. D. (2014). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton University Press.
Shi, J., Ausloos, M., & Zhu, T. (2018). Benford’s law first significant digit and distribution distances for testing the reliability of financial reports in developing countries. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 492, 878–888.
Stanley, M. H., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Mantegna, R. N., Salinger, M. A., & Stanley, H. E. (1995). Zipf plots and the size distribution of firms. Economics Letters, 49(4), 453–457.
NSI (2016). National Statistical Institute (NSI), Rezultate si peformante ale intreprinderilor din comert si servicii, Bucharest
NSI (2023) National Statistical Institute (NSI), TEMPO Online database, Bucharest. http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/#/pages/tables/insse-table. Retrieved on October 22nd, 2023.
Talamo, G., & Manuguerra, G. (2016). The gambling sector: A socio-economic analysis of the case of Italy. Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, 2(4), 315–330.
Acknowledgements
A preliminary version of the manuscript has been presented to DySES 2022 (Dynamics of Socio Economic Systems) to NEOMA Rouen (France), ICAS 2022 (The 16th International Conference on Applied Statistics) Predeal (Romania), Scientific Seminar MFB organized by the Faculty of Faculty of Finance and Banking, Bucharest University of Economic Studies (March 14th,2023) and Smart Diaspora 2023 Conference Timisoara (April 11th, 2023). We benefitted by comments and suggestions from the peers participating to above mentioned academic conferences/ seminars as well as from very constructive feedback provided by the two anonymous reviewers during peer review process. Our thanks to dr. Gurjeet Dhesi (Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca & Bucharest University of Economic Studies) for improving the English level of a later version of the manuscript.
Funding
Claudiu Herteliu is partially supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNDS-UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P4-ID-PCCF-2016-0084 and by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Research Innovation and Digitalization, MCID, project number ID-585-CTR-42-PFE-2021. Ionel Jianu, Alexandru Isaic-Maniu and Claudiu Herteliu are partially supported by the project “Societal and Economic Resilience within multi-hazards environment in Romania” funded by European Union—NextgenerationEU and Romanian Government, under National Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania, contract no.760050/ 23.05.2023, cod PNRR-C9-I8-CF 267/ 29.11.2022, through the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, within Component 9, Investment I8. Ionel Jianu and Claudiu Herteliu are partially supported by the project “A better understanding of socio-economic systems using quantitative methods from Physics” funded by European Union—NextgenerationEU and Romanian Government, under National Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania, contract no.760034/ 23.05.2023, cod PNRR-C9-I8-CF 255/29.11.2022, through the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, within Component 9, Investment I8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All co-authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jianu, I., Isaic-Maniu, A., Brandas, C. et al. Testing benford and universal laws on gambling and betting data in Romania. Ann Oper Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05739-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05739-y