Skip to main content
Log in

Allocation rules for multi-choice games with a permission tree structure

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider multi-choice cooperative games with a permission tree structure. Multi-choice games are a generalization of cooperative transferable utility games in which each player has several activity levels. In addition, a permission tree structure models a situation in which a player needs permission from another player to cooperate. In this framework, the influence of a permission structure on the possibility of cooperation may have several interpretations depending on the context. In this paper, we investigate several of these interpretations and introduce for each of them a new allocation rule that we axiomatically characterize.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We continue to denote the sovereign part and the authorizing part of s by \(\sigma (s)\) and \(\alpha (s)\) with the understanding that the underlying permission structure is \(S^+_m\).

References

  • Albizuri, M. J. (2009). The multichoice coalition value. International Journal of Game Theory, 172(1), 363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J., & Dreze, J. H. (1974). Cooperative games with coalition structures. International Journal of Game Theory, 3(4), 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béal, S., Lardon, A., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2012). The average tree solution for multi-choice forest games. Annals of Operations Research, 196(1), 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béal, S., Ferrières, S., & Solal, P. (2022). The priority value for cooperative games with a priority structure. International Journal of Game Theory, 51(2), 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branzei, R., Tijs, S., & Zarzuelo, J. (2009). Convex multi-choice games: Characterizations and monotonic allocation schemes. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(2), 571–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, E., & Santos, J. C. (2000). A value for multichoice games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 40(3), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derks, J., & Peters, H. (1993). A Shapley value for games with restricted coalitions. International Journal of Game Theory, 21(4), 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, B., Ni, D., & Wang, Y. (2012). Sharing a polluted river network. Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(3), 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, R. P., Owen, G., & van den Brink, R. (1992). Games with permission structures: The conjunctive approach. International Journal of Game Theory, 20(3), 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch, M., & Lange, F. (2007). Games on lattices, multichoice games and the shapley value: A new approach. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 65(1), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herings, J.-J., Van Der Laan, G., & Talman, D. (2008). The average tree solution for cycle-free graph games. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C.-R., & Raghavan, T. (1992). Monotonicity and dummy free property for multi-choice cooperative games. International Journal of Game Theory, 21(3), 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, F., Slikker, M., & Zarzuelo, J. (1999). Characterizations of a multi-choice value. International Journal of Game Theory, 28(4), 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowing, D., & Techer, K. (2022). Priority relations and cooperation with multiple activity levels. Journal of Mathematical Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowing, D., & Techer, K. (2022). Marginalism, egalitarianism and efficiency in multi-choice games. Social Choice and Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-022-01412-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1977). Graphs and cooperation in games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2(3), 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, D., & Wang, Y. (2007). Sharing a polluted river. Games and Economic Behavior, 60(1), 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen. G. (1977). Values of games with a priori unions. Mathematical economics and game theory, pp. 76–88

  • Peters, H., & Zank, H. (2005). The egalitarian solution for multichoice games. International Journal of Game Theory, 137(1), 399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2(28), 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink, R. (2017). Games with a permission structure - a survey on generalizations and applications. TOP, 25(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink, R., & Gilles, R. P. (1996). Axiomatizations of the conjunctive permission value for games with permission structures. Games and Economic Behavior, 12(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink, R., Herings, J.-J., Van Der Laan, G., & Talman, A. (2015). The average tree permission value for games with a permission tree. Economic Theory, 58(1), 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink, R., He, S., & Huang, J.-P. (2018). Polluted river problems and games with a permission structure. Games and Economic Behavior, 108, 182–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Nouweland, C. G. A. (1993). Games and graphs in economic situations. Tilburg university.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for their comments on our work. We also thank Sylvain Béal, Stéphane Gonzalez, Kevin Techer and Philippe Solal for useful comments. We are grateful to Encarnación Algaba and the EURO21 organizing committee for letting us present this paper at the EURO21 conference, Eric Bahel for letting us present this paper at the International Conference on Social Choice and Voting Theory, and the SING16 organizing committee for letting us present this paper at the European Meeting on Game Theory (2021). The author wants to thank GRDF (Gaz Réseau Distribution France) for their financial support through the ANRT (Association Nationale Recherche Technologie) doctoral program CIFRE (Conventions Industrielles de Formation par la REcherche).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lowing.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lowing, D. Allocation rules for multi-choice games with a permission tree structure. Ann Oper Res 320, 261–291 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04953-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04953-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation