Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptation of WO to the Euclidean location-allocation with unknown number of facilities

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study deals with the facility location-allocation problem with Euclidean distances and an unknown number of facilities. The problem is a harder variant of the NP-hard multisource weber problem where the number of facilities is known a priori. A worm optimization (WO) algorithm is developed for the problem, its parameters optimized using a custom design of experiments, and its performance assessed by comparing it to ant colony optimization (ACO) and genetic algorithms (GA). The extensive computational results showed that WO performed better than the other two algorithms in terms of both solution quality and convergence time, with ACO performing second and GA last.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aras, N., Orbay, M., & Altinel, I. K. (2008). Efficient heuristics for the rectilinear distance capacitated multi-facility Weber problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaout, J. P. (2018). Worm optimisation algorithm to minimise the makespan for the two-machine scheduling problem with a single server. International Journal of Operational Research, In Press.

  • Arnaout, J.-P. (2013). Ant Colony Optimization algorithm for the Euclidean location-allocation problem with unknown number of facilities. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaout, J.-P. (2016). Worm optimization for the traveling salesman problem. In G. Rabadi (Ed.), Heuristics, meta-heuristics and approximate methods in planning and scheduling, international series in operations research & management science. Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaout, J.-P. (2017). Worm optimization for the multiple level warehouse layout problem. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0334-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaout, J.-P. (2020). A worm optimization algorithm to minimize the makespan on unrelated parallel machines with sequence-dependent setup times. Annals of Operations Research, 285, 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaout, J.-P., Arnaout, G., & Khoury, J. (2016). Simulation and optimization of ant colony optimization algorithm for the stochastic uncapacitated location-allocation problem. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 12(4), 1215–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, M., Fleischmann, T., & Klamroth, K. (2009). The multi-facility location-allocation problem with polyhedral barriers. Computers and Operations Research, 36, 1376–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, M., & Klamroth, K. (2007). An efficient solution method for Weber problems with barriers based on genetic algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabazon, A., & McGarraghy, S. (Eds.). (2018). Worm foraging algorithm. In Foraging-inspired optimisation algorithms. Natural computing series. Springer.

  • Brimberg, J., Hansen, P., Mladenović, N., & Taillard, E. (2000). Improvements and comparison of heuristics for solving the uncapacitated multisource weber problem. Operations Research, 48, 444–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimberg, J., Mladenovic, N., & Salhi, S. (2004). The multi-source weber problem with constant opening cost. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(6), 640–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, H., David, V., & Salvat-Dávila, G. (2017). Transportation-location problem with unknown number of facilities. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 212–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. (1963). Location–allocation problems. Operations Research, 11, 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, T., & Drezner, Z. (2016). Sequential location of two facilities: Comparing random to optimal location of the first facility. Annals of Operations Research, 246(1–2), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Z., Brimberg, J., Salhi, S., & Mladenovic, N. (2016). New local searches for solving the multi-source Weber problem. Annals of Operations Research, 246, 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilon, S., Watson-Gandy, C. D. T., & Christofides, N. (1971). Distribution management, mathematical modelling and practical analysis. Hofner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamal, M. D. H., & Salhi, S. (2001). Constructive heuristics for the uncapacitated location-allocation problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 821–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houck, C. R., Joines, J. A., & Kay, M. G. (1996). Comparison of genetic algorithms, random restart and two-opt switching for solving large location-allocation problems. Computers and Operations Research, 23, 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabalameli, M., & Ghaderi, A. (2008). Hybrid algorithms for the uncapacitated continuous location-allocation problem. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37, 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krau S. (1997). Extensions du problème de Weber. PhD Thèse, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal.

  • Kuenne, R., & Soland, R. M. (1972). Exact and approximate solutions to the multisource Weber problem. Mathematical Programming, 3, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., & Xu, J. (2009). A study on facility location–allocation problem in mixed environment of randomness and fuzziness. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2011, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megiddo, N., & Supowit, K. J. (1984). On the complexity of some common geometric location problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 13, 182–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlemuller, M. (1997). Tabu search for large location-allocation problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48, 745–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasandideh, S., & Niaki, S. (2010). Genetic application in a facility location problem with random demand within queuing framework. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2012, 651–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinelt, G. (1991). TSLIB-a traveling salesman library. ORSA Journal of Computing, 3, 376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salhi, S., & Gamal, M. D. H. (2003). A genetic algorithm based approach for the uncapacitated continuous location-allocation problem. Annals of Operations Research, 123, 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiszfeld, E. (1937). Sur le point par lequel la somme des distances de n Points donnés est minimum. Tohoku Mathematical Journal, 43, 355–386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Paul Arnaout.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arnaout, JP., Khoury, J. Adaptation of WO to the Euclidean location-allocation with unknown number of facilities. Ann Oper Res 315, 57–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04708-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04708-1

Keywords

Navigation