Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving social sustainability and reducing supply chain risks through blockchain implementation: role of outcome and behavioural mechanisms

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation of blockchain technology holds promise for improving social sustainability and minimising risks across the supply chain. A theory-driven analysis of how blockchain implementation affects social sustainability and minimises risks (outcomes) is missing in supply chain management literature. In particular, the role of technology service providers in meeting these outcomes is unknown. This research addresses these gaps by identifying the outcome-based and behavioural mechanisms needed to generate social sustainability and reduce risks through blockchain projects using agency theory as a theoretical lens. We conduct in-depth interviews with key stakeholders for four blockchain implementation projects to answer these questions. We identify that developing user-friendly applications, developing secure digital payment systems, providing support for suppliers and farmers and adapting to local conditions as the key outcome-based mechanisms. Educating and engaging with customers and building local relationships are found to be the key behavioural mechanisms needed to improve social sustainability and minimise risks using blockchain. Finally, we compare the cases and develop propositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.ifinca.co/post/exploring-the-farm-gate-price.

  2. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/democratizing-the-coffee-supply-chain-with-ifinca-300939497.html.

  3. https://plasticbank.com/about/.

  4. https://www.ledgerinsights.com/bunkertrace-dna-blockchain-maritime-fuel-tracking/.

  5. https://www.ifinca.co/post/exploring-the-farm-gate-price.

  6. https://perfectdailygrind.com/2020/04/how-does-exchange-rate-fluctuation-affect-coffee-producers/.

References

  • Adams, R., Kewell, B., & Parry, G. (2018). Blockchain for good? Digital ledger technology and sustainable development goals. In Handbook of sustainability and social science research (pp. 127–140). Springer.

  • Aste, T., Tasca, P., & Di Matteo, T. (2017). Blockchain technologies: The foreseeable impact on society and industry. Computer, 50(9), 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzi, R., Chamoun, R. K., & Sokhn, M. (2019). The power of a blockchain-based supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 582–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2020). A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2142–2162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, K., & Janssen, M. F. W. H. A. (2020). Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, F. (2020). Can blockchain create a sustainable supply chain? https://www.raconteur.net/sustainability/sustainable-business-2020/blockchain-supply-chain, accessed August 20, 2020.

  • Charlebois, S. (2017). How Blockchain Technology Could Transform the Food Industry. In The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-blockchain-technology-could-transform-the-food-industry-89348

  • Chen, R. Y. (2018). A traceability chain algorithm for artificial neural networks using T-S fuzzy cognitive maps in blockchain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 80, 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., & Liker, J. K. (1995). Bringing Japanese continuous improvement approaches to US manufacturing: The roles of process orientation and communications. Decision Sciences, 26(5), 589–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. M. (2020). Supply chain financing using blockchain: Impacts on supply chains selling fashionable products. Annals of Operations Research, 1–23.

  • Cole, R., Stevenson, M., & Aitken, J. (2019). Blockchain technology: Implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(4), 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., & Potts, J. (2016). Economics of blockchain. Available at SSRN 2744751. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2744751 Accessed August 13, 2020.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekanayake, S. (2004). Agency theory, national culture and management control systems. Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1/2), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M. (1996). The use of the case study method in logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 17(2), 93–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Z. P., Wu, X. Y., & Cao, B. B. (2020). Considering the traceability awareness of consumers: Should the supply chain adopt the blockchain technology? Annals of Operations Research, 1–24.

  • Gualandris, J., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2016). Developing environmental and social performance: The role of suppliers’ sustainability and buyer-supplier trust. International Journal of Production Research, 54(8), 2470–2486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastig, G. M., & Sodhi, M. S. (2020). Blockchain for supply chain traceability: Business requirements and critical success factors. Production and Operations Management, 29(4), 935–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintze, J. (2019), Strengthening the Links: How Blockchain Can Help Manage Supply Chain Risk, http://www.rmmagazine.com/2019/10/01/strengthening-the-links-how-blockchain-can-help-manage-supply-chain-risk/, accessed Aug 20, 2020.

  • Hussain, M., Ajmal, M. M., Gunasekaran, A., & Khan, M. (2018). Exploration of social sustainability in healthcare supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 977–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbar, A., & Dani, S. (2020). Investigating the link between transaction and computational costs in a blockchain environment. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3423–3436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Arha, H. (2019). Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2009–2033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsaliaki, K., Galetsi, P., & Kumar, S. (2021). Supply chain disruptions and resilience: A major review and future research agenda. Annals of Operations Research, 1–38.

  • Klassen, R. D., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, L., Dolgui, A., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Blockchain in transport and logistics – paradigms and transitions. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2054–2062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpela, K., Hallikas, J., & Dahlberg, T. (2017). Digital supply chain transformation toward blockchain integration. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 4182–4191.

  • Koteska, B., Karafiloski, E., & Mishev, A. (2017). Blockchain implementation quality challenges: a literature. In SQAMIA 2017: 6th Workshop of Software Quality, Analysis, Monitoring, Improvement, and Applications (pp. 11–13). Accessed August 17, 2020. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1938/paper-kot.pdf

  • Kshetri, N. (2017). Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South? Third World Quarterly, 38(8), 1710–1732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. (2021). Blockchain and sustainable supply chain management in developing countries. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhelle, O. (1999). Towards sustainable development: On the goals of development—and the conditions of sustainability. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, M. K., Li, Y., Wang, C., & Tseng, M. L. (2021). A literature review of blockchain technology applications in supply chains: A comprehensive analysis of themes, methodologies and industries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 107–133.

  • Mackey, T. K., & Nayyar, G. (2017). A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 16(5), 587–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., & Dubey, R. (2016). Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 111, 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montecchi, M., Plangger, K., & Etter, M. (2019). It’s real, trust me! Establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain. Business Horizons, 62(3), 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxham, C., & Kauppi, K. (2014). Using organisational theories to further our understanding of socially sustainable supply chains: The case of fair trade. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 413–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamba, C. C., Chan, P. W., & Sharmina, M. (2017). How does social sustainability feature in studies of supply chain management? A review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 522–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, S. (2004). The ethical supply chain. In S. New & R. Westbrook (Eds.), Understanding supply chains: Concepts, critiques and futures (pp. 253–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orji, I. J., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Gupta, H. (2020). The critical success factors of using social media for supply chain social sustainability in the freight logistics industry. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1522–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peer Ledger. (2020). For Suppliers. Peer Ledger. https://peerledger.com/for-suppliers

  • Pilkington, M. (2016). Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In Research handbook on digital transformations (pp. 225–253). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Pournader, M., Shi, Y., Seuring, S., & Koh, S. L. (2020). Blockchain applications in supply chains, transport and logistics: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2063–2081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun, H., Swaminathan, J. M., & Hou, P. (2021). Blockchain adoption for combating deceptive counterfeits. Production and Operations Management, 30(4), 864–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, M. M., & Wamba, S. F. (2019). Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H. (2019). Blockchain and supply chain management integration: A systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(2), 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Chan, H. L., & Siqin, T. (2020). Demand forecasting in retail operations for fashionable products: Methods, practices, and real case study. Annals of Operations Research, 291(1), 761–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Beltagui, A., & Albores, P. (2020). The potential of emergent disruptive technologies for humanitarian supply chains: The integration of blockchain, Artificial Intelligence and 3D printing. International Journal of Production Research, 58(15), 4610–4630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rungtusanatham, M., Rabinovich, E., Ashenbaum, B., & Wallin, C. (2007). Vendor-owned inventory management arrangements in retail: An agency theory perspective. Journal of Business Logistics, 28(1), 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadouskaya, K. (2017). Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain and Logistic. Thesis. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/126096/Adoption%20of%20Blockchain%20Technology%20in%20Supply%20Chain%20and%20Logistics.pdf?sequence=1

  • Shafiq, A., Johnson, P. F., Klassen, R. D., & Awaysheh, A. (2017). Exploring the implications of supply risk on sustainability performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(10), 1386–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2018). Corporate social sustainability in supply chains: A thematic analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 882–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, S., Carroll, J., & Nious, K (2016). Unapproved airplane parts creating safety risk in aviation. https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/unapproved-airplane-parts-creating-safety-risk-in-aviation/110281/

  • Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

  • Tan, A., Gligor, D., & Ngah, A. (2020). Applying blockchain for halal food traceability. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1–18.

  • Tönnissen, S., & Teuteberg, F. (2020). Analysing the impact of blockchain-technology for operations and supply chain management: An explanatory model drawn from multiple case studies. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoda, K., Mathiopoulos, P. T., Sasase, I., & Ohtsuki, T. (2017). A novel blockchain-based product ownership management system (POMS) for anti-counterfeits in the post supply chain. IEEE Access, 5, 17465–17477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiblmaier, H. (2018). The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: A theory-based research framework and a call for action. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(6), 545–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Toward more rigorous blockchain research: Recommendations for writing blockchain case studies. In Blockchain and distributed ledger technology use cases (pp. 1–31). Springer.

  • Upadhyay, A., Mukhuty, S., Kumar, V., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126130.

  • Wall, M. (2016) Counterfeit drugs: ‘People are dying every day.’ BBC News (September 27), https://www.bbc.com/news/business-37470667

  • Wang, Y., Han, J. H., & Beynon-Davies, P. (2019). Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(1), 62–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED, S. W. S. . (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future, 17, 1–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., Li, Z., King, B., Ben Miled, Z., Wassick, J., & Tazelaar, J. (2017). A distributed ledger for supply chain physical distribution visibility. Information, 8(4), 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoh, P. (2017). Regulatory issues in blockchain technology. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 25(2), 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, R., & Yee, W. M. S. (2012). Food safety concern: Incorporating marketing strategies into consumer risk coping framework. British Food Journal, 114(1), 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiannas, F. (2018). A new era of food transparency powered by blockchain. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 12(1–2), 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

  • Young, S. B. (2018). Responsible sourcing of metals: Certification approaches for conflict minerals and conflict-free metals. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(7), 1429–1447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(2), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atanu Chaudhuri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: 1st and 2nd order codes

Appendix: 1st and 2nd order codes

1st order code from the case documents

2nd order code

Types of mechanisms

A QR code which follows the coffee from farm to café

Developing user-friendly applications

Outcome-based mechanisms

An application which can be used on the vessel to identify the supplied fuel to the ship with that supplied by the refiner and marked with a unique code

Easier to post all information when dismantling an aircraft, thus providing access to repair history

Application works for every user type- collectors, branch operator, processor, client

Developed tokenised digital savings and wallet and money is deposited in the member’s account so that they can store in digital savings or redeem right away

Developing customised and secure digital payment systems

Payment to the farmer as per the agreed farmgate price and exchange rate fixed at the time of acceptance of the order

Automated quality checking process of the paper work to avoid errors

Providing technical support

Providing farmers with an integrated calculator to determine their coffee’s parchment prices

Partner with local cooperative banks, which are most accessible to the local community

Adapting to local conditions

Use the farmer’s idea for encrypting QR code on the sack

Had to focus on solar-powered phone charging and wifi before implementing blockchain solution

Local team built good relationships and generated trust

Involving locals and building local relationships

Behaviour-based mechanisms

Cooperated as train the trainer, got the community to select someone to run the Plastic Bank

Engaging with the millennial users who want same online experience while transaction in their work as their online buying in personal life

Engaging with customers

Enabling the customer to leave message for the farmer by using the app

Customer should be able to engage with the app in a whole new way

Communicating how the system works with all partners

Educating customers

Changing the perception of customers through educational programme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaudhuri, A., Bhatia, M.S., Kayikci, Y. et al. Improving social sustainability and reducing supply chain risks through blockchain implementation: role of outcome and behavioural mechanisms. Ann Oper Res 327, 401–433 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04307-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04307-6

Keywords

Navigation