Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A novel advanced grey incidence analysis for investigating the level of resilience in supply chains

  • S.I. : Artificial Intelligence in Operations Management
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supply chain risk management embroils quite a lot of situations of managerial decision-making under uncertainties. As contemporary supply chains are intricate networks exposed to ample vulnerabilities, a resilient supply chain with inbuilt capabilities for responding to unanticipated events can assume significance. This paper proposes a decision support model for managers for knowing, measuring and improving the level of resilience in manufacturing supply chains. A novel computational methodology involving the incidence analysis and grey theory is proposed in this study. Using the methodology of advanced analysis of grey incidences, the level of resilience of supply chains can be measured. Various strategies and attributes imparting resilience, particularly relevant to the manufacturing industry are analyzed in this research. A framework considering five strategies and twenty-three attributes contributing to supply chain resilience is also constructed. And a case evaluation has been conducted to implementing the proposed methodology. Managers can ascertain their supply chain resilience capabilities by means of synthetic resilience index, as recommended in this study. From the measures of resilience for the bygone period, top management can assess and improve the resilience capabilities of their supply chain, by taking strategic level decisions.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(adapted from Rajesh 2019a)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: A dynamic capability view. Production Planning and Control, 29(14), 1158–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. H., & Razmi, J. (2009). “An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management: A case study of ISP selection and evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8639–8648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, S. G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., & Machado, V. C. (2012). Ecosilient index to assess the greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M., & Oke, A. (2007). Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource-based theory perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1217–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst, J., Craighead, C. W., Elkins, D., & Handfield, R. B. (2005). An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 43(19), 4067–4081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briano, E., Caballini, C., & Revetria, R. (2009). Literature review about supply chain vulnerability and resiliency. In Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS international conference on system science and simulation in engineering (pp.17–19). Genova, Italy.

  • Brusset, X., & Teller, C. (2017). Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, G. J., Carrillo, J., & Vakharia, A. J. (2008). Heuristics for sourcing from multiple suppliers with alternative quantity discounts. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelikbilek, Y., & Tüysüz, F. (2016). An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources. Energy, 115, 1246–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H. K., & Chan, F. T. (2010). Comparative study of adaptability and flexibility in distributed manufacturing supply chains. Decision Support Systems, 48(2), 331–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S., & Larsen, G. N. (2010). A framework for supplier-supply chain risk management: Tradespace factors to achieve risk reduction-return on investment. In IEEE international conference on technologies for homeland security (HST) (pp. 29–34). Boston, USA.

  • Chen, J., Sohal, A. S., & Prajogo, D. I. (2013). Supply chain operational risk mitigation: A collaborative approach. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 2186–2199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2012). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. IN MIT sloan management review (Fall 2004).

  • Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2017). Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colicchia, C., Dallari, F., & Melacini, M. (2010). Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context. Production Planning and Control, 21(7), 680–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croxton, K. L., Datugue, S. J., Lambert, D. M., & Rogers, D. S. (2001). The supply chain management processes. International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danese, P. (2011). Towards a contingency theory of collaborative planning initiatives in supply networks. International Journal of Production Research, 49(4), 1081–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepanraj, B., Sivasubramanian, V., & Jayaraj, S. (2017). Multi-response optimization of process parameters in biogas production from food waste using Taguchi-Grey relational analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 141, 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J. L. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters, 1(5), 288–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J. L. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal of Grey System, 1(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 414–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, Y., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 420–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droge, C., Vickery, S. K., & Jacobs, M. A. (2012). Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(2), 250–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2019a). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Blome, C., & Luo, Z. (2019b). Antecedents of resilient supply chains: An empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(1), 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elleuch, H., Dafaoui, E., Elmhamedi, A., & Chabchoub, H. (2016). Resilience and vulnerability in supply chain: Literature review. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 1448–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elluru, S., Gupta, H., Kaur, H., & Singh, S. P. (2017). Proactive and reactive models for disaster resilient supply chain. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1–2), 199–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisler, E., & Wickramasinghe, N. (2015). Principles of knowledge management: Theory, practice, and cases. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, E., & Valentin, P. (2013). Storm surge disaster risk management: the Xynthia case study in France. Journal of Risk Research, 16(7), 825–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, M., & Louis, M. (2011). A multi-agent based framework for supply chain risk management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(1), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Fattahi, M., & Keyvanshokooh, E. (2017). Supply chain network design under uncertainty: A comprehensive review and future research directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(1), 108–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Valikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R. (2007). Reducing the impact of disruptions to the supply chain. Sascom Magazine, pp. 34–40.

  • Hosseini, S., & Ivanov, D. (2019). A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: A Bayesian network approach. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03350-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. C. (2017). Electricity consumption prediction using a neural-network-based grey forecasting approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(10), 1259–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D. (2018). Revealing interfaces of supply chain resilience and sustainability: A simulation study. International Journal of Production Research, 56(10), 3507–3523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158–6174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2019). Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience. Annals of Operations Research, 283, 1191–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacxsens, L., Luning, P. A., Vorst, J. G. A. J., Devlieghere, F., Leemans, R., & Uyttendaele, M. (2010). Simulation modeling and risk assessment as tools to identify the impact of climate change on microbiological food safety—The case study of fresh produce supply chain. Food Research International, 43(7), 1925–1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, V., Kumar, S., Soni, U., & Chandra, C. (2017). Supply chain resilience: model development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6779–6800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner, U., & Maklan, S. (2011). Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 246–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 116–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincade, D. H., Regan, C., & Gibson, F. Y. (2007). Concurrent engineering for product development in mass customization for the apparel industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(6), 627–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. L., & Park, S. (2018). A portfolio approach to supply chain risk management. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. S., Choudhary, A., Babu, S. A. I., Kumar, S. K., Goswami, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2017). Designing multi-period supply chain network considering risk and emission: A multi-objective approach. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 427–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laanti, M. (2013). Agile and wellbeing–stress, empowerment, and performance in Scrum and Kanban teams. System sciences (HICSS). In 46th Hawaii international conference, IEEE (pp. 4761–4770). Grand Wailea, Maui, Hawaii.

  • Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavastre, O., Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Supply chain risk management in French companies. Decision Support Systems, 52(4), 828–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2011). Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: The case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1216–1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. Y. (2008). Supply chain risk management. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 1(1), 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Masuda, S., & Nagai, M. (2015). Predictor design using an improved grey model in control systems. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28(3), 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. D., Yamaguchi, D., & Nagai, M. (2007). A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(3–4), 573–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., Liu, L., Zhai, J., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Li, T. (2016). The improved grey model based on particle swarm optimization algorithm for time series prediction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 55, 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Li, B., Chen, P., & Hou, P. (2017a). Dual-channel supply chain decisions under asymmetric information with a risk-averse retailer. Annals of Operations Research, 257(1–2), 423–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Wu, Q., Holsapple, C. W., & Goldsby, T. (2017b). An empirical examination of firm financial performance along dimensions of supply chain resilience. Management Research Review, 40(3), 254–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., & Liu, S. (2004). A historical introduction to grey systems theory. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, 2403–2408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1075–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. L., Shang, K. C., Lirn, T. C., Lai, K. H., & Lun, Y. V. (2018). Supply chain resilience, firm performance, and management policies in the liner shipping industry. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 110, 202–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (2003). An introduction to grey systems: foundations, methodology and applications. Kybernetes, 32(4), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (2006). Grey information: Theory and practical applications. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (Eds.) (2007). Advances in grey systems theory and its applications. In IEEE international conference on grey systems and intelligent services (pp. 132–139). London: Springer.

  • Liu, W., Zhang, J., Jin, M., Liu, S., Chang, X., Xie, N., et al. (2017). Key indices of the remanufacturing industry in China using a combined method of grey incidence analysis and grey clustering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1348–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancheri, N. A., Sprecher, B., Bailey, G., Ge, J., & Tukker, A. (2019). Effect of Chinese policies on rare earth supply chain resilience. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 142, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslen, S. (2015). Organisational factors for learning in the Australian gas pipeline industry. Journal of Risk Research, 18(7), 896–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., et al. (2011). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business logistics, 22(2), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merschmann, U., & Thonemann, U. W. (2011). Supply chain flexibility, uncertainty and firm performance: An empirical analysis of German manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, D., Sharma, R. R. K., Kumar, S., & Dubey, R. (2016). Bridging and buffering: Strategies for mitigating supply risk and improving supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Rajesh, R., & Paul, S. K. (2018). Modeling the interrelationships among barriers to sustainable supply chain management in leather industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 631–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. B., & Manring, S. L. (2009). Strategy development in small and medium sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 276–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., & So, K. C. (2016). Component procurement strategies in decentralized assembly systems under supply uncertainty. IIE Transactions, 48(3), 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. K., Sarker, R., & Essam, D. (2017). A quantitative model for disruption mitigation in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(3), 881–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindorg, S. R., et al. (2010). How to improve R&D productivity: The pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9(3), 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, A., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Hybrid fuzzy-probabilistic approach to supply chain resilience assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(2), 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 35(4), 210–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pero, M., Abdelkafi, N., Sianesi, A., & Blecker, T. (2010). A framework for the alignment of new product development and supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3), 371–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (2011). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: OUP Catalogue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R. (2017). Technological capabilities and supply chain resilience of firms: A relational analysis using total interpretive structural modeling (TISM). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R. (2018a). On sustainability, resilience, and the sustainable–resilient supply networks. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 74–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R. (2018b). Measuring the barriers to resilience in manufacturing supply chains using grey clustering and VIKOR approaches. Measurement, 126, 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R. (2018c). Group decision-making and grey programming approaches to optimal product mix in manufacturing supply chains. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3675-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R. (2019a). A fuzzy approach to analyzing the level of resilience in manufacturing supply chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 224–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R. (2019b). Exploring the sustainability performances of firms using environmental, social, and governance scores. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R. (2020). A grey-layered ANP based decision support model for analyzing strategies of resilience in electronic supply chains. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87, 103338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (1999). A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management. Environmental Science and Technology, 33(18), 3049–3055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezapour, S., Farahani, R. Z., & Pourakbar, M. (2017). Resilient supply chain network design under competition: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(3), 1017–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, J. P., & Barbosa-Povoa, A. (2018). Supply chain resilience: Definitions and quantitative modelling approaches–A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 115, 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz, M. J., & Revilla, E. (2014). Creating more resilient supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(4), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahebjamnia, N., Torabi, S. A., & Mansouri, S. A. (2018). Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, K., & Schilder, S. (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 471–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. (2005). Building a resilient supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 1(5), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shervais, S., Shannon, T. T., & Lendaris, G. G. (2003). Intelligent supply chain management using adaptive critic learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 33(2), 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, U., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). Measuring supply chain resilience using a deterministic modeling approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 74, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, J. M., Smith, S. F., & Sadeh, N. M. (1998). Modeling supply chain dynamics: A multiagent approach. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 607–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taki, P., Barzinpour, F., & Teimoury, E. (2016). Risk-pooling strategy, lead time, delivery reliability and inventory control decisions in a stochastic multi-objective supply chain network design. Annals of Operations Research, 244(2), 619–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. W., Defee, C. C., Randall, W. S., & Williams, B. (2011). Assessing the managerial relevance of contemporary supply chain management research. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41(7), 655–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thun, J. H., & Hoenig, D. (2011). An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K., & Bruneau, M. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: A key to disaster loss reduction. TR News, 250, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, S. B., Xue, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, Q., Liu, Y., Zhou, J., et al. (2017). Models for forecasting growth trends in renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 1169–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukamuhabwa, B., Stevenson, M., & Busby, J. (2017). Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 486–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuncel, G., & Alpan, G. (2010). Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study. Computers in Industry, 61(3), 250–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahdani, B., Zandieh, M., & Roshanaei, V. (2011). A hybrid multi-stage predictive model for supply chain network collapse recovery analysis: A practical framework for effective supply chain network continuity management. International Journal of Production Research, 49(7), 2035–2060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2006). An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(6), 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M., & Neshat, N. (2010). Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2013). Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: A revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wamba, S. F. (2012). Achieving supply chain integration using RFID technology: The case of emerging intelligent B-to-B e-commerce processes in a living laboratory. Business Process Management Journal, 18(1), 58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2019). The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., & Rainey, I. D. (2012). A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Qi, L., Chen, C., Tang, J., & Jiang, M. (2014). Grey system theory based prediction for topic trend on internet. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 29, 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S., & Yanfeng, X. (2017). Research on China’s energy supply and demand using an improved Grey–Markov chain model based on wavelet transform. Energy, 118, 969–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(10), 887–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, M. C. (2013). The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: A relational view. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 43(4), 300–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Q., & Liu, Z. (2009). Real formal concept analysis based on grey-rough set theory. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(1), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, D., & Chen, B. (2011). A comprehensive decision-making model for risk management of supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 4957–4966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, T., & Qi, X. (2008). Price competition, cost and demand disruptions and coordination of a supply chain with one manufacturer and two competing retailers. Omega, 36(5), 741–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B., & Yang, Y. (2010). Postponement in supply chain risk management: A complexity perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 48(7), 1901–1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz Borekci, D., Rofcanin, Y., & Gürbüz, H. (2015). Organisational resilience and relational dynamics in triadic networks: A multiple case analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 53(22), 6839–6867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, F., Wassick, J. M., & Grossmann, I. E. (2009). Risk management for a global supply chain planning under uncertainty: Models and algorithms. AIChE Journal, 55(4), 931–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, B., Meng, W., & Tong, M. (2016). A self-adaptive intelligence grey predictive model with alterable structure and its application. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 50, 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Lu, Q., & Wu, T. (2011). Petri-net based applications for supply chain management: An overview. International Journal of Production Research, 49(13), 3939–3961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A., Ellram, L. M., Carter, J. R., & Cavinato, J. L. (2004). An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 397–413.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author sincerely thanks the Editor in Chief, Prof. Endre Boros, the special issue Editors, Prof. Samuel Fosso Wamba, Prof. Maciel M. Queiroz and Prof. Ashley Braganza and the two unknown reviewers for their insightful comments to improving the quality of the manuscript to a greater extent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management Division, ABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Gwalior, 474015, India

    R. Rajesh

Authors
  1. R. Rajesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Rajesh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Annexure 1

See Table 14.

Table 14 Recent literature on supply chain resilience
Full size table

1.2 Annexure 2

See Table 15.

Table 15 Strategies and attributes considered for supply chain resilience
Full size table

1.3 Annexure 3

See Table 16.

Table 16 Recent developments in grey theory and applications
Full size table

1.4 Annexure 4

See Table 17.

Table 17 Ranking order for supply chain resilience attributes on sensitivity analysis
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajesh, R. A novel advanced grey incidence analysis for investigating the level of resilience in supply chains. Ann Oper Res 308, 441–490 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03641-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03641-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation