Abstract
Conventional wisdom suggests that competition from a third-party remanufacturer lowers the original equipment manufacturer (OEM)’s profits. In this paper, we show that this may not hold for the remanufacturing competition when the presence of remanufactured products affects the consumers’ perceived value of new products. We introduce two new effects of remanufacturing: (1) third-party remanufacturer (TPR)’s remanufactured products shift the consumer valuation of new products upward, and (2) OEM’s remanufactured products shift the valuation downward. By comparing two alternatives of OEM, i.e., take part in remanufacturing or not, we demonstrate a new benefit of TPR competition. It helps the OEM to exploit the valuation of new product customers. Our results suggest that taking part in remanufacturing does not necessarily benefit an OEM. When TPR remanufactured products have low impact on consumers’ perceived value of new products, and only if the remanufacturing cost is sufficiently low, it is profitable for an OEM to engage in remanufacturing. Otherwise, remanufacturing may reduce profits for the OEM and in this case, the OEM should leave remanufacturing to the TPR. Therefore, facing with TPR competition, understanding the interactions between remanufacturing and perceived value of new products is important to an OEM. In addition, we find that low fraction of used products is not always bad for the TPR, and a high willingness-to-pay for the OEM’s remanufactured products may be harmful for the OEM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, V. V., Atasu, A., & van Ittersum, K. (2015). Remanufacturing, third-party competition, and consumers’ perceived value of new products. Management Science,61(1), 60–72.
Agrawal, V. V., Ferguson, M., & Souza, G. C. (2016). Trade-in rebates for price discrimination and product recovery. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,63(3), 326–339.
Atasu, A., Guide, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2010). Sowhat if remanufacturing cannibalizes my new product sales? California Management Review,52(2), 56–76.
Atasu, A., Sarvary, M., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2008). Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Science,54(10), 1731–1746.
Basak, D. (2017). Cournot vs. Bertrand under centralised bargaining. Economics Letters,154, 124–127.
Chen, L. T., & Wei, C. C. (2012). Multi-period channel coordination in vendor-managed inventory for deteriorating goods. International Journal of Production Research,50(16), 4396–4413.
Cisco. (2009). Cisco Refresh: Get the value of Cisco Products at significant savings with fully certified remanufactured equipment. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/remanufactured.html.
Dastidar, K. G. (1997). Comparing Cournot and Bertrand in a homogeneous product market. Journal of Economic Theory,75, 205–212.
Debo, L. G., Toktay, L. B., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Science,51(8), 1193–1205.
Esenduran, G., Kemahlıoglu-Ziya, E., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2017). Impact of take-back regulation on the remanufacturing industry. Production and Operations Management,26(5), 924–944.
Ferguson, M. E., & Toktay, B. (2006). The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Production and Operations Management,15(3), 351–368.
Ferrer, G. (1997). The economics of tire remanufacturing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,19, 221–255.
Ferrer, G., & Swaminathan, J. (2006). Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Science,52(1), 15–26.
Ferrer, G., & Swaminathan, J. (2010). Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products. European Journal of Operational Research,203(1), 370–379.
Giuntini, R., & Gaudette, K. (2003). Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity. Business Horizons,46(6), 41–48.
Guide, V. D. R. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: Industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management,18(4), 467–483.
Guide, V. D. R., & Li, J. (2010). The potential for cannibalization of new products sales by remanufactured products. Decision Sciences,41(3), 547–572.
Guide, V. D. R., Muyldermans, L., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Hewlett-Packard company unlocks the value potential from time sensitive returns. Interfaces,35(4), 281–293.
Hackner, J. (2000). A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies. Journal of Economic Theory,93, 233–239.
Hauser, W. M., & Lund, R. T. (2008). Remanufacturing, operating practices and strategies: Perspectives on the management of remanufacturing businesses in the United States. Research report, Boston University, Boston.
Heese, H. S., Cattani, K., Ferrer, G., Gilland, W., & Roth, A. V. (2005). Competitive advantage through take-back of used products. European Journal of Operational Research,164(1), 143–157.
Hewlett-Packard. (2014). Ink and toner cartridges. Retrieved from November 24, 2014, http://www8.hp.com/us/en/ads/supplies/overview.html.
Kim, C. K., Lavack, A. M., & Smith, M. J. (2001). Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands. Journal of Business Research,52(3), 211–222.
Majumder, P., & Groenevelt, H. (2001). Competition in remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management,10(2), 125–141.
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review,110(3), 472–489.
Örsdemir, A., Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya, E., & Parlaktürk, A. K. (2014). Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management,23(1), 48–64.
Ovchinnikov, A. (2011). Revenue and cost management for remanufactured products. Production and Operations Management,20(6), 824–840.
Rozanova, O. (2017). Wholesale prices and Cournot–Bertrand competition. Bulletin of Economic Research,69(4), E12–E18.
Seyedesfahani, M. M., Biazaran, M., & Gharakhani, M. (2011). A game theoretic approach to coordinate pricing and vertical co-op advertising in manufacturer–retailer supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research,211(2), 263–273.
Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. Rand Journal of Economics,15(4), 546–554.
Souza, G. (2013). Closed-loop supply chains: A critical review, and future research. Decision Science,44(1), 7–38.
Subramanian, R., & Subramanyam, R. (2008). Key drivers in the market for remanufactured products: Empirical evidence from eBay. Retrieved from December 1, 2008, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1320719.
Vorasayan, J., & Ryan, S. M. (2006). Optimal price and quantity of refurbished products. Production and Operations Management,15(3), 369–383.
Wang, L., Cai, G., Tsay, A. A., & Vakharia, A. J. (2017). Design of the reverse channel for remanufacturing: Must profit-maximization harm the environment? Production and Operations Management,26(8), 1585–1603.
Webster, S., & Mitra, S. (2007). Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws. Journal of Operations Management,25, 1123–1140.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71801005), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (Nos. 1808085QG227, 1608085MG152), the Innovation Project for Oversea Scholars (2019LCX007), and the Social Sciences Foundation of Anhui Province (No. AHSKQ2016D28).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, C., You, Z., Yang, Y. et al. Is third-party remanufacturing necessarily harmful to the original equipment manufacturer?. Ann Oper Res 291, 317–338 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03445-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03445-2