Abstract
Environmental regulations can increase enterprise production costs and reduce production efficiency. This study analyzes the annual reports of 132 enterprises in 16 highly polluting industries over 9 years, which includes 52,272 data points comprising 1188 observed values from the 132 enterprises. We find that environmental regulations tend to increase the environment-friendly and non-environment-friendly research and development (R&D) inputs of the enterprises. Irrespective of the type of R&D input, the quality of the enterprise staff improves and their enthusiasm and initiative for work increases, resulting in increased enterprise production efficiency. Additionally, an increase in human capital significantly facilitates the improvement of enterprise staff quality, whereas, an expansion in the size of an enterprise does not tend to improve its productivity owing to decreasing returns to scale. This study further conducts a robustness test that replaces the explanatory variables with total factor productivity and resolves Malmquist efficiency indexes. The result of this robustness test supports the preliminary regression results. The conclusion of this study can help enterprises be competitive in global markets, and the results can serve as advice for the leads of enterprises.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aamir, R. H., & Johannes, V. B. (2010). Market structure and innovation: A dynamic analysis of the global automobile industry. NBER Working Paper No. 15959.
Acemoglu, D. (2002). Directed technical change. Review of Economic Studies,69, 781–809.
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166.
Acemoglu, D., Gancia, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2015). Offshoring and directed technical change. American Economic Journal - Macroeconomics,7, 84–122.
Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,81, 209–226.
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Executive, 22(4), 45–62.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics,68, 29–51.
Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van, R. J. (2016). Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Review of Economic Studies,83, 87–117.
Botta, E., & Koźluk, T. (2014). Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. NO. 1177. OECD Publishing.
Cai, H., Chen, Y., & Gong, Q. (2016). Polluting thy neighbor: Unintended consequences of China’s pollution reduction mandates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,76, 86–104.
Cao, B., & Wang, S. (2017). Opening up, international trade, and green technology progress in China. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 1002–1012.
Chen, Y. Y. (2011). Effect of industrial environmental regulations on employment: Empirical research on 25 industries. Modern Economic Science,33, 67–73. (in Chinese).
Chiara, P., & Ferreira, I. S. G. (2011). Competition and innovation in Luxembourg. Journal of Industry Competition and Trade,12, 93–117.
Cleff, T., & Rennings, K. (1999). Determinants of environmental product and process innovation. European Environment,9, 191–201.
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. American Economic Association, 42(1), 7–71.
Danquah, M., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2017). Assessing the relationships between human capital, innovation and technology adoption: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,122, 24–33.
Day, C. (2016). Non-scale endogenous growth with R&D and human capital. Scottish Journal of Political Economy,63, 443–467.
Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy,11(2), 183–206.
Duvivier, C., & Xiong, H. (2013). Transboundary pollution in China: A study of polluting firms’ location choices in Hebei Province. Environment and Development Economics,18, 459–483.
Ghisetti, C., & Pontoni, F. (2015). Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics,118, 57–66.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies,58, 43–61.
Hamamoto, M. (2006). Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics,28, 299–312.
Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy,37, 163–173.
Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. The Review of Economics and Statistics,79(4), 610–619.
Kashif, M., & Ayesha, A. (2018). Effect of economic growth, trade openness, urbanization, and technology on environment of Asian emerging economies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal,29(6), 1123–1134.
Li, J., Ji, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Non-linear effects of environmental regulations on economic outcomes. Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal.,30(2), 368–382.
Lim, W., & Yi, C. (2017). Technology innovation, human capital and R&D effects on economic growth. International Area Studies Review,21, 201–219.
Marin, G. (2014). Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Research Policy,43(2), 301–317.
Oh, D.-H. (2010). A global Malmquist of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operation Research,130, 498–509.
Oleg, B., & Subal, C. K. (2017). Economies of scale, technical change and persistent and time-varying cost efficiency in Indian banking: Do ownership, regulation and heterogeneity matter? European Journal of Operational Research,260, 789–803.
Popp, D. (2012). The role of technological change in green growth. NBER Working Paper, No. 18506.
Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American,264, 168.
Porter, M. E., & Van Der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,9, 97–118.
Rennings, K., & Rammer, C. (2009). Increasing energy and resource efficiency through innovation: An explorative analysis using innovation survey data. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance,5, 442–459.
Song, M. L., & Wang, S. H. (2017). Participation in global value chain and green technology progress: Evidence from big data of Chinese enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,24, 1648–1661.
Song, M. L., Wang, S. H., Lei, L., & Zhou, L. (2019). Environmental efficiency and policy change in China: A new meta-frontier non-radial angle efficiency evaluation approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,121, 281–289.
Sunku, H. (2010). Predation, competition, comparison, and innovation. Economics Letters,106, 122–124.
Tan, X. M. (2006). Environment, governance and GDP: Discovering their connections. International Journal of Sustainable Development,9, 311–335.
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,130, 498–509.
Wally, N., & White, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review,72, 46–52.
Wei, W., Zhao, Y., Wang, J., & Song, M. (2019). The environmental benefits and economic impacts of Fit-in-Tariff in China. Renewable Energy,133, 401–410.
Yang, C., Tseng, Y., & Chen, C. (2012). Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics,9, 514–532.
Zhang, S., Hu, T., Li, J., Cheng, C., Song, M., Xu, B., et al. (2019). The effects of energy price, technology, and disaster shocks on China’s Energy-Environment-Economy system. Journal of Cleaner Production,207, 204–213.
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71471001, 41771568, 71533004, 71503001; 71601170); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0602500; 16YJC630123).
Funding
This work was supported by the Major Projects of National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 18ZDA126) and the Support Plan for Innovative Talents in Colleges and Universities of Liaoning Province (Grant No. WR2017007), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71471001 and 71601170).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Y., Du, J. & Wang, S. Environmental regulations, enterprise productivity, and green technological progress: large-scale data analysis in China. Ann Oper Res 290, 369–384 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03249-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03249-4