Skip to main content
Log in

Pension schemes versus real estate

  • S.I.: Recent Developments in Financial Modeling and Risk Management
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The demographic, economic and social changes that have characterized the last decades, and the dramatic financial crisis that has taken place since 2008, have led to a demand for structural changes in the pension sector and a growing interest in individual pension products. Hence the need, for most elderly people, to liquidate their fixed assets, which are usually the homes in which they live. This highlights products such as reverse mortgages and domestic reversibility plans. Within this context, we propose a contractual scheme where an immediate life annuity is obtained by paying a single-premium in the form of real estate rights (RERs), for example by transferring to an insurer the property title of a house or a similar realty, while keeping its usufruct or a restricted bundle of rights. The level of the installments depends on the fair value of the transferred RER at the contract’s issue, the life expectancy of the insured and the expected growth rate of the real estate market value. The contract design is developed by considering the control of the financial risk inherent in the contract itself, because of the prospective changes in the value of the RERs, and the level of the insurer’s leverage. Finally, we provide some numerical evidence of the proposed contractual structure, in order to compare the level of the installments according to the house return forecasts in different European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalbers, B. M. (2012). Subprime cities and the twin crises. In M. B. Aalbers (Ed.), Subprime cities: The political economy of mortgage markets. Chichester: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347456.ch.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Agenzia delle Entrate. (2017). Gli immobili in Italia, ricchezza, reddito e fiscalità immobiliare, Ministero delle Finanze e Agenzia delle Entrate. http://www1.finanze.gov.it/finanze3/immobili/contenuti/immobili_2017.pdf.

  • Alai, D. H., Chen, H., Cho, D., Hanewald, K., & Sherris, M. (2014). Developing equity release markets: Risk analysis for reverse mortgage and home reversion. North American Actuarial Journal, 18(1), 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Cox, S. H., & Wang, S. S. (2010). Is the home equity conversion program in the United States sustainable? Evidence from pricing mortgage insurance premiums and non recourse provisions using the conditional Escher transform. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, 46, 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinloy, P., Cho, M., & Megbolugbe, I. F. (1997). Appraisals, transaction incentives, and smoothing. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14(1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente Merencio, I., Navarro, E., & Serna, G. (2018). Estimating the no-negative-equity guarantee in reverse mortgages: International sensitivity analysis. In: New methods in fixed income modeling. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95285-7_13.

  • Fornero, E., Rossi, M., & Virzì Bramati, M. C. (2016). Explaining why, right or wrong, (Italian) households do not like reverse mortage. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 15(2), 180–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin J. (2016). Feature: Nobel prize-winning economist Robert Merton. The Reverse Review June 2016. https://www.reversereview.com/magazine/features/feature-nobel-prize-winning-economist-robert-merton.html.

  • Hanewald, K., Post, T., & Sherris, M. (2016). Portfolio choice in retirement: What is the optimal home equity release product? Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(2), 421–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. (2014). Lifetime mortgage. A good and appropriate investment for life companies with annuity liabilities? May 2014. https://www.actuaries.org.uk/system/…/lifetime-mortgage.pdf.

  • Lennartz, C., Arundel, R., & Ronald, R. (2016). Younger adults and homeownership in Europe through the global financial crisis. Population, Space and Place, 22, 823–835. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. S. H., Hardy, M. R., & Tan, K. S. (2010). On pricing and hedging the no-negative equity guarantee in equity release mechanisms. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 77(2), 499–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C., & Lai, R. N. (2016). On an efficient design of the reverse mortgage: Structure, marketing and funding. November 2016. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2017/…/paper/3hsNdR4f.

  • Mudrazija, S., & Butrica, A. B. (2017). Homeownership, social insurance, and old-age security in the United States and Europe. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. http://crr.bc.edu.

  • Nakajima, M., & Telywcava, I. (2017). Reverse mortgage loans: A quantitative analysis. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 911–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasch, J. M. (2005). Legal cadastral domain model. An object-orientated approach. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 2(1), 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasch, J. M. (2008). Standardization within the legal domain: A terminological approach. In: T. Doganoglu, M. J. Holler, & J. Tiedeman (Eds.) Euras yearbook of standardization (Vol. 6, pp. 105–130). Online publication. ISBN 978-3-89265-102-4. Internet document. https://uni.uni-hamburg.de/onTEAM/grafik/1164287680/Paasch.pdf.

  • Paasch, J. M. (2011). Classification of real property rights: A comparative study of real property rights in Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden. Stockholm: Real Estate Planning and Land Law, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plat, R. (2009). On stochastic mortality modeling. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 45(3), 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, A., & Haberman, S. (2006). A cohort-based extension to the Lee–Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38(3), 556–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, K., Lunde, J., & Whitehead, C. (2008). Mortgage product innovation in advanced economies: More choice, more risk. International Journal of Housing Policy, 8(2), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, A. W., Chen, H., & Sherris, M. (2018). To borrow or insure? Long term care costs and the impact of housing. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2707350.

  • Shao, A. W., Hanewal, K., & Sherris, M. (2015). Reverse mortgage pricing and risk analysis allowing for idiosyncratic home price risk and longevity risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 63, 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, A., & Gilardi, C. (2013). Soluzioni finanziarie per la terza età. Bari: Cacucci Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Valdez, E. A., & Piggot, J. (2008). Securitization of longevity risk in reverse mortgage. North American Actuarial Journal, 12, 345–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Website list

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. D’Amato.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Amato, V., Di Lorenzo, E., Haberman, S. et al. Pension schemes versus real estate. Ann Oper Res 299, 797–809 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03241-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03241-y

Keywords

Navigation