Framework for sustainable maintenance system: ISM–fuzzy MICMAC and TOPSIS approach
- 148 Downloads
Due to the increasing complexity of manufacturing processes and automation, maintenance of all machines and equipments has become challenging task for production managers today. Due to lack of sensitivity for maintenance, share of maintenance cost in total product cost is also increasing along with decreased productivity. Organizations are either quite slow or getting failed in updating their maintenance systems with time. Keeping in view the importance of maintenance in today’s context, this study has tried to develop a framework for a sustainable maintenance system for manufacturing organizations. Usually organizations are not able to identify critical factors for effective maintenance. Therefore, in this context, the study has identified fourteen factors for the effective maintenance management from the literature review. Some of these factors are process oriented and some are result oriented. Interpretive structural modeling approach is applied for the development of structural relationship among the factors from a strategic perspective. Fuzzy MICMAC analysis is then carried out to categorize these factors based on their driving and dependence value. Further to prioritise major driving factors, Technique for order preferences by similarity of an ideal solution approach has been also applied. It is observed that top management support and commitment, strategic planning and implementation, continuous upgradation of maintenance system to reduce manufacturing lead time and cost are major factors to ensure the sustainable competitive advantage.
KeywordsMaintenance management Sustainability Productivity Manufacturing strategy Fuzzy methods
Authors are grateful to the Editor of the journal and reviewers for giving valuable suggestions to improve the quality and content of this research paper.
- Everett, C. (2002). Penn states commitment to quality improvement. Quality Progress, 35(1), 44–49.Google Scholar
- Halcomb, E., & Andrew, S. (2005). Triangulation as a method for contemporary nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 13(2), 71–82.Google Scholar
- Harrington, H. J. (1987). The improvement process: How America’s leading companies improve quality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
- Lin, X. J., Lin, Q., & Zhang, G. N. (2015). Effectivity of total productive maintenance (TPM) in large size organizations—A case study in Shandong Lingong. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 701, 1249–1252.Google Scholar
- Poduval, P. S., Pramod, V. R., & Jagathy Raj, V. P. (2015). Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and its application in analyzing factors inhibiting implementation of total productive maintenance (TPM). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 32(3), 308–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rafiq, M. (2015). Structural health monitoring for maintenance management of deteriorating structures: Current practice and state of the art. In 2nd International and 6th national conference on earthquake structures, Kerman, Iran.Google Scholar
- Sharma, R., & Trikha, V. (2011). TPM implementation in piston manufacturing industry for OEE. Current Trends in Engineering Research, 1(1), 122–129.Google Scholar
- Singh, R. K., Gunasekaran, A., & Kumar, P. (2017). Third party logistics (3PL) selection for cold chain management: A fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Annals of Operations Research, 267, 1–23.Google Scholar
- Wakjira, M. W., & Singh, A. P. (2012). Total productive maintenance: A case study in manufacturing industry. Global Journal of Research in Engineering, 12(1-G), 24–32.Google Scholar
- World Development Indicators. (2013). Manufacturing, value added (% of gdp). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi. Accessed 21 Sept 2016.
- Yan, J. (2015). Machinery prognostics and prognosis oriented maintenance management. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar