Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stakeholders, green manufacturing, and practice performance: empirical evidence from Chinese fashion businesses

  • S.I.: SOME
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the relationship among stakeholders, green manufacturing, and practice performance in the fashion business in China and focuses on assisting companies to enhance environmental awareness and green manufacturing practices. We collect research data by developing questionnaires for various Chinese enterprises. A five-point Likert scale is adopted to enable respondents to indicate the extent to which they agree with the items. Through tests and analyses, the questionnaire is validated as reliable, the structural equation model has a good fitting degree, and hypotheses are proved true. Specifically, corporate stakeholders have a significant positive impact on green manufacturing and practice performance, and green manufacturing has a significant positive impact on practice performance in the context of Chinese fashion businesses. Moreover, corporate stakeholders can have a positive impact on practice performance through green manufacturing. We also propose some policy implications, including implementing compulsive policies and regulations and encouraging and establishing preferential policies, such as tax concessions. Moreover, enterprises should actively strive to improve green manufacturing technology and management level to ensure the smooth implementation of green manufacturing practices. To retain sustained earnings and development, green manufacturing should be the bottom line of involved firms. We also emphasize that the importance of corporate stakeholders should be promoted in consideration of enterprises’ practice performance and future development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See https://www.businessoffashion.com.

  2. See http://www.eeff.net/thread-412479-1-1.html.

  3. See http://www.m448.com/info/docview_189741.html.

References

  • Ageron, B., Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainable supply management: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics,140(1), 168–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, C. J. (2012). Marketing and organizational development in e-SMEs: Understanding survival and sustainability in growth-oriented and comfort-zone pure-play enterprises in the fashion retail industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,8(2), 165–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Martin, A. (2009). Governance of environmental risk: New approaches to managing stakeholder involvement. Journal of Environmental Management,90, 1567–1575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, M. (2011). Influence from the business environment on environmental purchasing-drivers and hinders of purchasing green transportation services. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,17(1), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal,24(5), 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Ellram, L. M. (1998). Reverse logistics: A review of the literature and framework for future investigation. Journal of Business Research,19(1), 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, M. K., & Shih, L. H. (2007). An empirical study of the implementation of green supply chain management practices in the electrical and electronic industry and their relation to organizational performances. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,4(3), 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. M., & Cai, Y. J. (2018). Impacts of lead time reduction on fabric sourcing in apparel production with yield and environmental considerations. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2838-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. M., Chen, Y., & Chung, S. H. (2017). Online-offline fashion franchising supply chains without channel conflicts: Choices on postponement and contracts. International Journal of Production Economics,10–15, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y., & Zhang, N. (2011). Does proactive green logistics management improve business performance? A case of Chinese logistics enterprises. African Journal of Business Management,5(17), 7564–7574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Pollution reduction preferences of US environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 627–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curwen, L. G., Park, J., & Sarkar, A. K. (2013). Challenges and solutions of sustainable apparel product development: A Case Study of Eileen Fisher. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,31(1), 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, B. F., & Huang, S. C. (2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,21(12), 1539–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Jolley, G. J., & Handfield, R. (2008). Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: Complements for sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment,17(1), 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Seol, I., & Sarkis, J. (2009). Perceived stakeholder influences and organizations’ use of environmental audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society,34(2), 170–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal,27(8), 765–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y. F., & Watson, G. (2013). An integrated framework to assess the impact of sustainable supply chain management practices on firms’ performance. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Global Manufacturing and China,2013, 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective (p. 13). Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathy, S. P., Natarajan, J., Gunasekaran, A., & Subramanian, N. (2014). Influence of eco-innovation on Indian manufacturing sector sustainable performance. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,21(3), 198–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics,140(1), 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. B., & Wiest, C. D. (2007). Shareholders beware! When individual shareholders may be left holding the bag for environmental liability. Journal of Taxation of Investments,24(3), 226–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Gonzalez-Benito, O. (2006). The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices. International Journal of Production Research,44(7), 1353–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. W., Zelbst, P. J., Meacham, J., & Bhadauria, V. S. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: Impact on performance. International Journal of Supply Chain Management,17(3), 290–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualandris, J., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2014). Customer pressure and innovativeness: Their role in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,20(2), 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry,29(2), 307–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajmohammad, S., Vachon, S., Klasse, R. D., & Gavronski, I. (2013). Lean management and supply management: Their role in green practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production,39, 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research,141(1), 70–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, M. D., Newma, W. R., & Johnson, P. (2000). Linking operational and environmental improvement through employee involvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,20(2), 148–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Xu, K., & Carnes, C. M. (2016). Resource based theory in operations management research. Journal of Operations Management,41, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (2000). Competitive environmental strategy: A guide to the changing business landscape. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. C., Ding, H. B., & Kao, M. R. (2009). Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management & Organization,15(3), 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (2008). Pioneer countries and the global diffusion of environmental innovations: Theses from the viewpoint of ecological modernisation theory. Global Environmental Change,18(3), 360–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janicke, M. (2008). Ecological modernisation: New perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production,16(5), 557–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, V., Singh, R., & Anandnarayan, A. (2012). Impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on consumer perception and revenue growth: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Research,50(5), 1395–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, X., Li, G., & Wang, Z. (2017a). Allocation of emission permits for China’s power plants: A systemic Pareto optimal method. Applied Energy, 204, 607–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, X., Li, G., & Wang, Z. (2017b). Impact of emission regulation policies on Chinese power firms’ reusable environmental investments and sustainable operations. Energy Policy, 108, 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, H., & Singh, S. P. (2016). Sustainable procurement and logistics for disaster resilient supply chain. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2374-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. T., & Lee, S. Y. (2012). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental logistics practices: Is eco-oriented culture a missing link? International Journal of Logistics Management,23(2), 238–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaerheim, G. (2005). Cleaner production and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production,13(4), 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K. H., & Wong, C. W. V. (2012). Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega-International Journal of Management Science,40(3), 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D., & Tan, K. C. (2013). Green supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems,113(8), 1088–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M., Rha, J. S., Choi, D., & Noh, Y. (2013). Pressures affecting green supply chain performance. Management Decision,51(8), 1753–1768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Liu, W., Wang, Z., & Liu, M. (2017). An empirical examination of energy consumption, behavioral intention, and situational factors: evidence from Beijing. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1–2), 507–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Sun, J., & Wang, Z. (2018a). Exploring the energy consumption rebound effect of industrial enterprises in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Energy Efficiency. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9743-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Zheng, H., Ji, X., & Li, H. (2018b). Game theoretical analysis of firms’ operational low-carbon strategy under various cap-and-trade mechanisms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(1), 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Zheng, H., Sethi, S. P., & Guan, X. (2018c). Inducing Downstream Information Sharing via Manufacturer Information Acquisition and Retailer Subsidy. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., Qi, G. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2014). Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. Journal of Cleaner Production,64, 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & McAlister, D. T. (2003). Socially responsible organizational buying: How can stakeholders dictate purchasing policies? Journal of Macro Marketing,23(2), 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G., & Krause, D. (2014). Understanding the role of government and buyers in supplier energy efficiency initiatives. Journal of Supply Chain Management,50(2), 84–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, K., Smith, H. A., & Henham, A. (1998). Logistics performance measurement and greening supply chains: Diverging mindset. International Journal of Logistics Management,9(1), 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, K. K. L., Youn, C., Chang, J. M. T., & Yeung, A. W. H. (2013). Product design scenarios for energy saving: A case study of fashion apparel. International Journal of Production Economics,146(2), 392–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R., Poomkaew, B., & Nath, P. (2014). The impact of organizational pressures on environmental performance of firms. Business Ethics-A European Review,23(2), 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, F. (1999). Market failure and the environmental policies of firms: Economic rationales for “beyond compliance” behavior. Journal of Industrial Ecology,3(1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N., & Wijen, F. (2006). Stakeholder power and organizational learning incorporate environmental management. Organization Studies,27(2), 235–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J., & JandPaul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics,32(2), 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusinko, C. A., & Green manufacturing, (2007). An evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,54(3), 445–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management,28, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics,130, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrettle, S., Hinz, A., Scherrer-Rathje, M., & Friedli, T. (2014). Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms’ sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics,147, 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 681–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. L., Fisher, R., Wang, J. L., & Cui, L. B. (2018). Environmental performance evaluation with big data: Theories and methods. Annals of Operations Research,270(1–2), 459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. L., Zhang, W., & Qiu, X. M. (2015). Emissions trading system and supporting policies under an emissions reduction framework. Annals of Operations Research,228(1), 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. P. (1992). Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society & Natural Resources,5(4), 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Li, G., & Wang, Z. (2018a). Optimizing China’s energy consumption structure under energy and carbon constraints. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 47, 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Wang, Z., & Li, G. (2018b). Measuring emission-reduction and energy-conservation efficiency of Chinese cities considering management and technology heterogeneity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. L., Huang, F. H., & Chiu, A. S. F. (2012). Performance drivers of green innovation under incomplete information. Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management Society,40, 234–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M., & Fynes, B. (2012). Supply chain environmental investments in dynamic industries: Comparing investment and performance differences with static industries. International Journal of Production Economics,135(2), 541–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. W. Y., Lai, K. H., Shang, K. C., & Lu, C. S. (2014). Uncovering the Value of Green Advertising for Environmental Management Practices. Business Strategy and the Environment,23(2), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn, S., Yang, M. G., Hong, P., & Park, K. (2013). Strategic supply chain partnership, environmental supply chain management practices, and performance outcomes: An empirical study of Korean firms. Journal of Cleaner Production,56, 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J. J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Firm-level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context. Omega-International Journal of Management Science,36(4), 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. This research is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the grant nos. 91746110, 71372019, 91746208, 71521002; the National Science Fund of China for Distinguished Young Scholars under the grant no. 71625003; the Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China

    Guo Li & Zhaohua Wang

  2. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China

    Guo Li & Zhaohua Wang

  3. Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, Beijing, 100081, China

    Guo Li & Zhaohua Wang

  4. Centre for Business in Society, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK

    Ming K. Lim

  5. College of Mechanical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 404100, China

    Ming K. Lim

Authors
  1. Guo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming K. Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaohua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, G., Lim, M.K. & Wang, Z. Stakeholders, green manufacturing, and practice performance: empirical evidence from Chinese fashion businesses. Ann Oper Res 290, 961–982 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03157-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03157-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation