Humanitarian aid delivery decisions during the early recovery phase of disaster using a discrete choice multi-attribute value method
- 49 Downloads
The humanitarian aid delivery problem associated with the early recovery phase of a disaster often incorporates multiple attributes. In this paper, the relative importance of various humanitarian aid attributes was measured using a discrete choice multi-attribute value method. This approach identifies all possible non-dominated pairs explicitly ranked by experts and provides an overall complete ranking of attributes. The performance score of each aid delivery plan was then calculated using the attributes’ ranking by solving a corresponding linear programming model. As an application study, the issues pertaining to the early recovery phase of 2017 flood in Assam, India, were analyzed. It was concluded that the ‘delivery amount’ is the most preferred attribute selected by humanitarian experts.
KeywordsHumanitarian logistics Aid delivery Early recovery phase Pairwise comparison Discrete choice method
The authors would like to thank the Associate Editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped in improving the quality and presentation of this manuscript. The authors are also thankful to Dr. Shibu K. Mani, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai Campus, for his support while conducting this study, and Professor Paul Hansen, Department of Economics, University of Otago, for granting free access to 1000minds software.
- Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters–CRED. (2016). Emergency events database (EM-DAT). https://www.cred.be/projects/EM-DAT.publications. Accessed 10 Nov 2017.
- Charter, H., & Response, D. (2011). The sphere project. Response (Vol. 1). ISBN 978-1-908176-00-4.Google Scholar
- Christoplos, I. (2006). Links between relief, rehabilitation and development in the tsunami response: A synthesis of initial findings. Joint Evaluation of the Tsunami Evaluation Coalition, 5, 1–115.Google Scholar
- Etkin, D. (2016). An interdisciplinary approach to concepts and causes. Disaster Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800227-8.00003-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holguin-Veras, J., Taniguchi, E., Jaller, M., Aros-Vera, F., Ferreira, F., & Thompson, R. G. (2014). The Tohoku disasters: Chief lessons concerning the post disaster humanitarian logistics response and policy implications. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Humanitarian, T., & Group, P. (2003). HPG report. Security, 10(20), 34.Google Scholar
- Inter-Agency Group Assam. (2017). Joint needs assessment report.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (2013). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Rff Press.Google Scholar
- Mosel, I., & Levine, S. (2014). Remaking the case for linking relief, rehabilitation and development: How LRRD can become a practically useful concept for assistance in difficult places. HPG Commissioned Report (p. 27).Google Scholar
- Ortuño, M. T., Cristóbal, P., Ferrer, J. M., Martín-Campo, F. J., Muñoz, S., Tirado, G., et al. (2013). Decision aid models and systems for humanitarian logistics. A survey. In B. Vitoriano, J. Montero, & D. Ruan (Eds.), Decision aid models for disaster management and emergencies (Vol. 7, pp. 17–44). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-74-9_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Özdamar, L., Ekinci, E., & Küçükyazici, B. (2004). Emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Annals of Operations Research, 129(1–4), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000030690.27939.39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomas, A. S., & Mizushima, M. (2005). Logistics training: Necessity or luxury? Forced Migration Review, 22, 60–61.Google Scholar
- United Nations University. (2016). World risk report 2016—Logistics and infrastructure. World Risk Report, 74. ISBN 9783946785026.Google Scholar
- Wash Information Management Toolkit. (2014). https://www.alnap.org/help-library/wash-information-management-toolkit. Accessed 10 Nov 2017.