Social sustainability in the oil and gas industry: institutional pressure and the management of sustainable supply chains

  • Athanasios Rentizelas
  • Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
  • Ahmed Darwish Al Balushi
  • Andrea Tuni


This article addresses certain gaps highlighted in the literature relating to the investigation of supplier selection through a theoretical lens, based on contextual factors, institutional pressure, and industrial features. Consequently, this article sheds light on how a government’s strategic plans can drive organisations to incorporate elements of social sustainability into their supply chains. A successful case from Oman which demonstrates the social dimension of sustainability in selecting suppliers in the oil and gas sector is presented, along with the government’s role and the mechanisms it has applied. A survey of purchasing, procurement and supply chain managers in Oman’s major oil and gas organisations was conducted, along with interviews. The results of this research were further analysed through the lens of institutional theory, addressing a genuine research gap. It was found that: (a) coercive governmental pressure is not sufficient to truly develop socially sustainable practices in organisations if the organisations themselves do not show initiative, as this leads to compliant rather than innovative practice; and (b) policy makers need to be aware that coercive pressure alone does not lead to continuous improvement of social sustainability performance, due to the ceiling effect, i.e. organisations meeting only the minimum governmental requirements.


Sustainable operations Supply chain Sustainability Social responsibility Coercive pressure Government 


  1. Adebanjo, D., Teh, P. L., & Ahmed, P. (2016). The impact of external pressure and sustainable management practices on manufacturing performance and environmental outcomes. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 36(9), 995–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aktin, T., & Gergin, Z. (2016). Mathematical modelling of sustainable procurement strategies: Three case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 767–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad, A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12, 1668–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2015). Managing social standards in global supply chains: Risk identification and mapping. Accessed August 11, 2017.
  5. APICS. (2015). APICS supply chain council. Accessed April 16, 2016.
  6. Appolloni, A., Sun, H., Jia, F., & Li, X. (2014). Green procurement in the private sector: A state of the art review between 1996 and 2013. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aydin Keskin, G., Ilhan, S., & Özkan, C. (2010). The fuzzy ART algorithm: A categorization method for supplier evaluation and selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1235–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azadi, M., Jafarian, M., Farzipoor Saen, R., & Mirhedayatian, S. M. (2015). A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers and Operations Research, 54, 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azadnia, A. H., Saman, M. Z. M., & Wong, K. Y. (2015). Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: An integrated multi-objective decision-making process. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baden, D. A., Harwood, I. A., & Woodward, D. G. (2009). The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counter productive? European Management Journal, 27(6), 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Banaeian, N., Mobli, H., Fahimnia, B., Nielsen, I. E., & Omid, M. (2018). Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry. Computers and Operations Research, 89, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beske, P., & Seuring, S. (2014). Putting sustainability into supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brandenburg, M., & Rebs, T. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management: A modeling perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 229(1), 213–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. British Standards Institution. (2015). BSI Global Supply Chain Intelligence report reveals global business impact of security, human rights and environmental violations. Accessed August 11, 2017.
  16. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. CIPS. (2015). CIPS sustainability index. Accessed June 2017
  19. Dai, J., & Blackhurst, J. (2012). A four-phase AHP–QFD approach for supplier assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 5474–5490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dou, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2010). A joint location and outsourcing sustainability analysis for a strategic offshoring decision. International Journal of Production Research, 48, 567–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dou, Y., Sarkis, J., & Bai, C. (2014). Government green procurement: A Fuzzy-DEMATEL analysis of barriers. Supply chain management under fuzziness (pp. 567–589). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., Giannakis, M., et al. (2017). Examining the effect of external pressures and organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems (PMS) for sustainability benchmarking: Some empirical findings. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ehrgott, M., Reimann, F., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2011). Social sustainability in selecting emerging economy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eriksson, D., & Svensson, G. (2015). Elements affecting social responsibility in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(5), 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feng, Y., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foerstl, K., Reuter, C., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment—Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16, 118–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., Moll, H. C., & Schoot Uiterkamp, J. M. (2003). Design and development of a measuring method for environmental sustainability in food production systems. Ecological Economics, 46, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. GRI. (2017). Official website. Accessed June 2017.
  33. Griffis, S. E., Autry, C. W., Thornton, L. M., & Brik, A. B. (2014). Assessing antecedents of socially responsible supplier selection in three global supply chain contexts. Decision Sciences, 45(6), 1187–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grob, S., & Benn, S. (2014). Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: An institutional theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 21(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoejmose, S. U., & Adrien-Kirby, A. J. (2012). Socially and environmentally responsible procurement: A literature review and future research agenda of a managerial issue in the 21st century. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hsu, P. F., Hu, P. J. H., Wei, C. P., & Huang, J. W. (2014). Green purchasing by MNC subsidiaries: The role of local tailoring in the presence of institutional duality. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 647–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1688–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Igarashi, M., de Boer, L., & Michelsen, O. (2015). Investigating the anatomy of supplier selection in green public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 442–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ISO. (2016). First International Standard for sustainable procurement nears publication. Accessed November 10, 2016.
  40. Jindal, A., & Sangwan, K. S. (2016). Multi-objective fuzzy mathematical modelling of closed-loop supply chain considering economical and environmental factors. Annals of Operations Research, 257, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnsen, T. E., Miemczyk, J., & Howard, M. (2017). A systematic literature review of sustainable purchasing and supply research: Theoretical perspectives and opportunities for IMP-based research. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kalyuzhnova, Y., Nygaard, C. A., Omarov, Y., & Saparbayev, A. (2016). Local content policies in resource-rich countries. Euro-Asian studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: A case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaur, H., & Singh, S. P. (2016). Sustainable procurement and logistics for disaster resilient supply chain. Annals of Operations Research. Scholar
  45. Khor, K. S., Udin, Z. M., Ramayah, T., & Hazen, B. T. (2016). Reverse logistics in Malaysia: The contingent role of institutional pressure. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kondra, A. Z., & Hinings, C. R. (1998). Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organization Studies, 19(5), 743–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuo, R. J., Wang, Y. C., & Tien, F. C. (2010). Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1161–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee, A. H., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., & Hung, H. C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917–7927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., & Dubey, R. (2016). Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 111, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Claudy, M. (2015). Going above and beyond: how sustainability culture and entrepreneurial orientation drive social sustainability supply chain practice adoption. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McKinsey. (2014). Sustainability’s strategic worth: McKinsey Global Survey results. Accessed December 1, 2016.
  53. Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T. E., & Macquet, M. (2012). Sustainable purchasing and supply management: A structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 478–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MOG—Ministry of Oil and Gas. (2013). Standardisation of ICV requirements in contracting and procurement Oman oil and gas sector suppliers engagement session. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  55. Oxford Business Group. (2014). The Report: Oman.Google Scholar
  56. Oxford Business Group. (2016). The Report: Oman.Google Scholar
  57. Quarshie, A. M., Salmi, A., & Leuschner, R. (2016). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(2), 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rezaei, J., Kadziński, M., Vana, C., & Tavasszy, L. (2017). Embedding carbon impact assessment in multi-criteria supplier segmentation using ELECTRE TRI-rC. Annals of Operations Research. Scholar
  59. Sancha, C., Longoni, A., & Giménez, C. (2015). Sustainable supplier development practices: Drivers and enablers in a global context. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(2), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seles, B. M. R. P., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Dangelico, R. M. (2016). The green bullwhip effect, the diffusion of green supply chain practices, and institutional pressures: Evidence from the automotive sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 342–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shen, L., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2016). Key factors affecting green procurement in real estate development: A China study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shibin, K. T., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Hazen, B., Roubaud, D., Gupta, S., et al. (2017). Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory. Annals of Operations Research. Scholar
  65. Thornton, L. M., Autry, C. W., Gligor, D. M., & Brik, A. B. (2013). Does socially responsible supplier selection pay off for customer firms? A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(3), 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tseng, M.-L., Tan, K.-H., Lim, M., Lin, R.-J., & Geng, Y. (2013). Benchmarking eco-efficiency in green supply chain practices in uncertainty. Production Planning and Control, 7287, 1–12.Google Scholar
  67. Tsireme, A. I., Nikolaou, E. I., Georgantzis, N., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2012). The influence of environmental policy on the decisions of managers to adopt G-SCM practices. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 14(5), 953–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vachon, S., & Mao, Z. (2008). Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: A country-level analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1552–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wetzstein, A., Hartmann, E., Benton, W. C., Jr., & Hohenstein, N. O. (2016). A systematic assessment of supplier selection literature—State-of-the-art and future scope. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 304–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Winter, S., & Lasch, R. (2016). Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation—Lessons from the fashion and apparel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wong, J. K. W., San Chan, J. K., & Wadu, M. J. (2016). Facilitating effective green procurement in construction projects: An empirical study of the enablers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 859–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and World Resources Institute (WRI) (2009). The Greenhouse gas protocol initiative: Scope 3 Accounting and Reporting Standard. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  73. Wu, Z., & Pullman, M. E. (2015). Cultural embeddedness in supply networks. Journal of Operations Management, 37, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yawar, S. A., & Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: A literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 621–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhu, Q. (2016). Institutional pressures and support from industrial zones for motivating sustainable production among Chinese manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 402–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016). Sustainable supplier management—A review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1412–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zorzini, M., Hendry, L. C., Huq, F. A., & Stevenson, M. (2015). Socially responsible sourcing: Reviewing the literature and its use of theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(1), 60–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Athanasios Rentizelas
    • 1
  • Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
    • 2
  • Ahmed Darwish Al Balushi
    • 3
  • Andrea Tuni
    • 1
  1. 1.Design Manufacture and Engineering Management DepartmentUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Montpellier Business SchoolMontpellier Research in ManagementMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.Occidental Oman, Inc.MuscatOman

Personalised recommendations