Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 254, Issue 1–2, pp 61–87 | Cite as

The impact of network inhomogeneities on contagion and system stability

  • Arnd Hübsch
  • Ursula WaltherEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This work extends the contagion model introduced by Nier et al. (J Econ Dyn Control 31(6):2033–2060, 2007. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/workingpapers/wp346.pdf) to inhomogeneous networks. We preserve the convenient description of a financial system using a sparsely parameterized random graph, but add several relevant inhomogeneities. These include well-connected banks, financial institutions with disproportionately large interbank assets, and big banks that focus on wholesale and retail customers. These extensions significantly enhance the model’s generality as they reflect realistic inhomogeneities that have a potentially decisive impact on a system’s stability. We find that large and well-connected banks have a surprisingly modest impact. However, institutions with disproportionately large interbank assets significantly increase the risk of contagion in networks. Moreover, these effects can be partly compensated by a redistribution of equity capital, even without increasing the total amount. However, the level of regulatory capital should be defined according to the interbank market position of a bank, and not the size of the bank.

Keywords

Banking system Capital buffers Contagion Contagious defaults Inhomogeneities Network models Financial system stability Systemic risk 

References

  1. Aikman, D., Alessandri, P., Eklund, B., Gai, P., Kapadia, S., Martin, E., et al. (2009). Funding liquidity risk in a quantitative model of systemic stability. Bank of England Working Paper 372.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, F., & Babus, A. (2009). Networks in finance. In P. Kleindorfer, J. Wind, & R. E. Gunther (Eds.), The network challenge. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anand, K., Gai, P., Kapadia, S., Brennan, S., & Willison, M. (2012). A network model of financial system resilience. Bank of England Working Paper No. 458.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, P., DasGupta, B., Kaligounder, L., & Kerpinski, M. (2011). On vulnerability of banking networks. arXiv:1110.3546v2 [q-finRM]
  6. Blum, M., & Krahnen, J. P. (2014). Systemic risk in an interconnected banking system with endogenous asset markets. Journal of Financial Stability, 13, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caccioli, F., Catanach, T. A., & Farmer, J. D. (2012). Heterogeneity, correlations and financial contagion. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(supp02), 1250058.Google Scholar
  8. Cifuentes, R., Ferrucci, G., & Shin, H. S. (2005). Liquidity risk and contagion. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2/3), 556–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cihák, M., Muñoz, S., & Scuzzarella, R. (2011). The bright and the dark side of cross-border banking linkages. IMF Working Papers WP/11/186.Google Scholar
  10. Cont, R., Moussa, A., & Santos, E. B. (2012). Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems. Working Paper Columbia Center for Financial Engineering.Google Scholar
  11. Cont, R., Moussa, A., & Santos, E. B. (2013). Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems. In J. Fouque & J. Langsam (Eds.), Handbook of systemic risk (pp. 327–368). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisenberg, L., & Noe, T. H. (2001). Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Science, 47(2), 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott, M., Golub, B., & Jackson, M. O. (2014). Financial networks and contagion. American Economic Review, 104(10), 3115–3153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elsinger, H., Lehar, A., & Summer, M. (2006). Risk assessment for banking systems. Management Science, 52(9), 1301–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erdös, P., & Rényi, A. (1959). On random graphs, I. Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6, 290–297. http://www.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/Erdos.html#1959-11.
  16. European Central Bank. (2010a). Analytical models and tools for the identification and assessment of systemic risks. Financial Stability Review, 38–46.Google Scholar
  17. European Central Bank. (2010b). Financial networks and financial stability. Financial Stability Review, 155–160.Google Scholar
  18. Freixas, X., Parigi, B. M., & Rochet, J. C. (2000). Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the central bank. In Proceedings (pp. 611–640). http://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedcpr/y2000p611-640.html.
  19. Gai, P., & Kapadia, S. (2010). Contagion in financial networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 466(2120), 2401–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Georg, C. P. (2013). The effect of the interbank network structure on contagion and financial stability. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 2216–2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hale, G. (2012). Bank relationships, business cycles, and financial crises. Journal of International Economics, 117, 196–215. http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2011/wp11-14bk.pdf.
  22. Krause, A., & Giansante, S. (2012). Interbank lending and the spread of bank failures: A network model of systemic risk. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 83, 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenzu, S., & Tedeschi, G. (2012). Systemic risk on different interbank network topologies. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 391(18), 4331–4341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nier, E., Yang, J., Yorulmazer, T., & Alentorn, A. (2007). Network models and financial stability. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31(6), 2033–2060. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/workingpapers/wp346.pdf.
  25. Sachs, A. (2014). Completeness, interconnectedness and distribution of interbank exposures: A parameterized analysis of the stability of financial networks. Quantitative Finance, 14(9), 1677–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tasca, P., & Battiston, S. (2014). Diversification and financial stability. London School of Economics, SRC Discussion Paper No. 10.Google Scholar
  27. Teteryatnikova, M. (2014). Systemic risk in banking networks: Advanatages of “tiered” banking systems. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 47, 186–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Upper, C. (2007). Using counterfactual simulations to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. BIS Working Papers 234.Google Scholar
  29. Upper, C. (2011). Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. Journal of Financial Stability, 7(3), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Watts, D. J. (2002). A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(9), 5766–5771. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3058573.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.d-fine GmbHFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Berlin School of Economics and LawBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations