Abstract
Let \( (\varOmega , d )\) be a metric space where \(\varOmega \) is a set with positive and finite Hausdorff outer measure in its Hausdorff dimension and let \(\mathbf B \) be a partition of \(\varOmega \). The coherent upper conditional prevision defined as the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure is proven to satisfy the disintegration property on every non-null partition and the coherent unconditional prevision is proven to be fully conglomerable on every partition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Billingsley, P. (1986). Probability and measure. New York: Wiley.
de Finetti, B. (1972). Probability, induction and statistics. New York: Wiley.
de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability. London: Wiley.
Denneberg, D. (1994). Non-additive measure and integral. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dominiak, A. (2013). Iterated Choquet expectations: A possibility result. Economics Letters, 120(2), 155–159.
Doria, S. (2007). Probabilistic independence with respect to upper and lower conditional probabilities assigned by Hausdorff outer and inner measures. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 46, 617–635.
Doria, S. (2010). Coherent upper conditional previsions and their integral representation with respect to Hausdorff outer measures. In C. Borgelt, et al. (Eds.), Combining soft computing and statistical methods in data analysis, advances in intelligent and soft computing (Vol. 77, pp. 209–216). Berlin: Springer.
Doria, S. (2011). Coherent upper and lower conditional previsions defined by hausdorff outer measures. In A. Rauh & E. Auer (Eds.), Modeling, designs and simulation of systems with uncertainties (pp. 175–195). Berlin: Springer.
Doria, S. (2012). Characterization of a coherent upper conditional prevision as the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure. Annals of Operations Research, 195, 33–48.
Doria, S. (2015). Symmetric coherent upper conditional prevision defined by the Choquet integral with respect to by Hausdorff outer measure. Annals of Operations Research, 229, 377–396.
Dubins, L. E. (1975). Finitely additive conditional probabilities, conglomerability and disintegrations. The Annals of Probability, 3, 89–99.
Falconer, K. J. (1986). The geometry of fractals sets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kadane, J. B., Schervish, M. J., & Seidenfeld, T. (1986). Statistical implications of finitely additive probability. In P. Goel & A. Zellner (Eds.), Bayesian inference and decision techniques with applications (pp. 59–76). Amsterdam: Noth-Holland.
Kadane, J. B., Schervish, M. J., & Seidenfeld, T. (2008). Is ignorance bliss? The Journal of Philosophy, 105(1), 5–36.
Miranda, E., Zaffalon, M., & de Cooman, G. (2012). Conglomerable natural extension. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 53(8), 1200–1227.
Regazzini, E. (1987). De Finetti’s coherence and statistical inference. The Annals of Statistics, 15(2), 845–864.
Rogers, C. A. (1970). Hausdorff measures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Mc Graw-Hill.
Rudin, W. (1991). Functional analysis. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, Science/Engineering/Math.
Schervish, M. J., Seidenfeld, T., & Kadane, J. B. (1984). The extent of non-conglomerability of finitely additive probabilities. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete, 66, 205–226.
Scozzafava, R. (1986). Probabilita’ \(\sigma \)-additive a non, Bollettino U.M.I., (6) 1-A, 1-33.
Seidenfeld, T., Schervish, M. J., & Kadane, J. K. (1998). Non-conglomerability for finite-valued, finitely additive probability. The Indian Journal of Statistics, Special issue on Bayesian Analysis, 60(Series A), 476–491.
Seidenfeld, T., Schervish, M. J., Kadane, J. K. (2013). Two theories of conditional probability and non-conglomerability. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, 2–3 July 2013, Campiegne, France.
Walley, P. (1991). Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. London: Chapman and Hall.
Yoo, K. R. (1991). The iterative law of expectation and non-additive probability measure. Economics Letters, 37, 145–149.
Zimper, A. (2011). Re-examining the law of iterated expectations for Choquet decision makers. Theory and Decision, 71(4), 669–677.
Acknowledgments
The author is grateful to the reviewers for the comments that improved the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doria, S. On the disintegration property of coherent upper conditional prevision defined by the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure. Ann Oper Res 256, 253–269 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2270-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2270-9
Keywords
- Coherent upper conditional previsions
- Hausdorff outer measures
- Choquet integral
- Disintegration property
- Conglomerability principle
- Law of iterated expectations