Skip to main content
Log in

On the disintegration property of coherent upper conditional prevision defined by the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure

  • IUKM2015
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \( (\varOmega , d )\) be a metric space where \(\varOmega \) is a set with positive and finite Hausdorff outer measure in its Hausdorff dimension and let \(\mathbf B \) be a partition of \(\varOmega \). The coherent upper conditional prevision defined as the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure is proven to satisfy the disintegration property on every non-null partition and the coherent unconditional prevision is proven to be fully conglomerable on every partition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billingsley, P. (1986). Probability and measure. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B. (1972). Probability, induction and statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denneberg, D. (1994). Non-additive measure and integral. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dominiak, A. (2013). Iterated Choquet expectations: A possibility result. Economics Letters, 120(2), 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doria, S. (2007). Probabilistic independence with respect to upper and lower conditional probabilities assigned by Hausdorff outer and inner measures. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 46, 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doria, S. (2010). Coherent upper conditional previsions and their integral representation with respect to Hausdorff outer measures. In C. Borgelt, et al. (Eds.), Combining soft computing and statistical methods in data analysis, advances in intelligent and soft computing (Vol. 77, pp. 209–216). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Doria, S. (2011). Coherent upper and lower conditional previsions defined by hausdorff outer measures. In A. Rauh & E. Auer (Eds.), Modeling, designs and simulation of systems with uncertainties (pp. 175–195). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Doria, S. (2012). Characterization of a coherent upper conditional prevision as the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure. Annals of Operations Research, 195, 33–48.

  • Doria, S. (2015). Symmetric coherent upper conditional prevision defined by the Choquet integral with respect to by Hausdorff outer measure. Annals of Operations Research, 229, 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubins, L. E. (1975). Finitely additive conditional probabilities, conglomerability and disintegrations. The Annals of Probability, 3, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, K. J. (1986). The geometry of fractals sets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadane, J. B., Schervish, M. J., & Seidenfeld, T. (1986). Statistical implications of finitely additive probability. In P. Goel & A. Zellner (Eds.), Bayesian inference and decision techniques with applications (pp. 59–76). Amsterdam: Noth-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadane, J. B., Schervish, M. J., & Seidenfeld, T. (2008). Is ignorance bliss? The Journal of Philosophy, 105(1), 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, E., Zaffalon, M., & de Cooman, G. (2012). Conglomerable natural extension. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 53(8), 1200–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regazzini, E. (1987). De Finetti’s coherence and statistical inference. The Annals of Statistics, 15(2), 845–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. A. (1970). Hausdorff measures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Mc Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, W. (1991). Functional analysis. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, Science/Engineering/Math.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schervish, M. J., Seidenfeld, T., & Kadane, J. B. (1984). The extent of non-conglomerability of finitely additive probabilities. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete, 66, 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scozzafava, R. (1986). Probabilita’ \(\sigma \)-additive a non, Bollettino U.M.I., (6) 1-A, 1-33.

  • Seidenfeld, T., Schervish, M. J., & Kadane, J. K. (1998). Non-conglomerability for finite-valued, finitely additive probability. The Indian Journal of Statistics, Special issue on Bayesian Analysis, 60(Series A), 476–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenfeld, T., Schervish, M. J., Kadane, J. K. (2013). Two theories of conditional probability and non-conglomerability. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, 2–3 July 2013, Campiegne, France.

  • Walley, P. (1991). Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, K. R. (1991). The iterative law of expectation and non-additive probability measure. Economics Letters, 37, 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimper, A. (2011). Re-examining the law of iterated expectations for Choquet decision makers. Theory and Decision, 71(4), 669–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the reviewers for the comments that improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serena Doria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doria, S. On the disintegration property of coherent upper conditional prevision defined by the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure. Ann Oper Res 256, 253–269 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2270-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2270-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation