A causal analytic approach to student satisfaction index modeling
- 207 Downloads
The increasing number of new higher education institutions (HEIs) has resulted in a fierce competition for attracting and retaining the best students. In line with these purposes, this study is aimed at devising a student satisfaction index (SSI) model for the HEIs. The SSI model is developed to measure the satisfaction of students in terms of different aspects such as image of the university, expectations, perceived quality, perceived value, and loyalty. The SSI model was developed using the Bayesian neural networks-based Universal Structure Modeling method. The results provide strategically valuable information for HEIs decision makers with regard to influential factors of student satisfaction and loyalty.
KeywordsStudent satisfaction index Higher education Bayesian neural networks Universal Structure Modeling Causal analytics Data mining
Authors are thankful to the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. They are also grateful to the Editor-in-Chief of Annals of Operations Research, Dr. Endre Boros, and managing editor, Katie D’Agosta, for their timely management of this manuscript’s submission.
- Buckler, F., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2008). Identifying hidden structures in marketing’s structural models through universal structure modeling. Marketing, 2, 49–68.Google Scholar
- Buckler, F. (2010). Neusrel 3.2, universal structure modeling software, matlab-based analysis software—manual.Google Scholar
- Butt, B. Z., & Rehman, K. (2010). A study examining the students satisfaction in higher education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5446–5450.Google Scholar
- Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. In Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences (Vol. 17, No. 7). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Chien, T.K., Chang, T.H., & Su, C.T. (2002). Did your efforts really win customers’ satisfaction? industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(4), 253–262.Google Scholar
- Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Dib, H., & Alnazer, M. (2013). The impact of service quality on student satisfaction and behavioral consequences in higher education services. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 6(2), 285–290.Google Scholar
- Fornell, C., & Cha, J. (1994). Partial least squares. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Advanced methods of marketing research (pp. 52–78). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Gefen, D., Straub, W. D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modelling and regression: Guidlines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1–80.Google Scholar
- Martensen, A., Grønholdt, L., Eskildsen, J. K., & Kristensen, K. (2000). Measuring student oriented quality in higher education application of the ECSI methodology. TQM for Higher Education Institutions, 9(1), 371–383.Google Scholar
- Østergaard, P., & Kristensen, K. (2006). Drivers of student satisfaction and loyalty at different levels of higher education (HE)—Cross-institutional results based on ECSI methodology. http://pure.au.dk//portal/files/214/PAPER_SRHE_2005_SESSION_PAPER_6.31.PDF. Accessed Jan 2013.
- Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting (Vol. 1, pp. 739–742).Google Scholar
- Temizer, L., & Turkyilmaz, A. (2012). Implementation of stundent satisfaction index model in higher education institutions. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3802–3806.Google Scholar
- Thomas, S. (2011). What drives student loyalty in universities an empirical model from India. International Business, 4(2), 183–192.Google Scholar
- Wold, H. (1985). Partial least squares. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (pp. 581–591). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar