Provider selection and task allocation in telecommunications with QoS degradation policy
The information age that we are living in is characterized by exponentially increasing needs and corresponding means to access, transmit and use data in a variety of business settings. Fast growing demand, which is translated to market opportunities, has led to the emergence of many new and well-established firms entering into the telecommunications market, resulting in a crowded, highly competitive business environment with numerous providers and carriers offering a wide range of data services. Today’s firms use telecommunication networks in a variety of ways to carry out their daily communications such as video conferencing, voice over IP and other data-intensive transmissions. In this paper, we report on a study in which we investigate a cost optimization problem that a firm encounters when acquiring network bandwidth from a telecommunication market that consists of many backbone providers offering different combinations of pricing policies and quality of service (QoS) levels. After the acquisition of network resources (bandwidth), firms allocate these resources to their daily data transmissions (tasks) according to the QoS requirement of the tasks. In an optimal allocation scheme, it is generally presumed that each task has to be assigned to a network resource which is capable of providing an equal or higher level of QoS than required by the task. However, it is shown with the proposed heuristic approach (presented herein) that QoS degradations during the allocation of tasks can lead to more favorable outcomes, especially when certain cost penalty policies are applied to the reduction of QoS requirements.
KeywordsTelecommunications Sourcing QoS degradation Heuristic
This research is partially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) Career Development Program under Grant No. 106 K 263, and the NPRP award (NPRP 7-308-2-128) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author(s).
- Ballon, P., de Munck, S., Poel, M., & Van de Pas, P. (2001). The Dutch telecommunications market. A strategic and empirical analysis. Technical Report TNO Report STB-01-03. TNO Strategy, Technology & Policy, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Comer, D. E. (2008). Computer networks and internets (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Das, S. K., Sen, S. K., Agrawal, P., & Basu, K. (1997). Modeling QoS degradation in multimedia wireless networks. In Personal wireless communications, 1997 IEEE international conference on (pp. 484–488). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Junqi, W., Zhengbing, H., Jiuming, Y., & Jun, S. (2007). The degradation of bandwidth in qos scheme for 4g mobile networks. In Wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference on (pp. 2020–2024). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Li, B., Hamdi, M., Iang, D., Cao, X.-R., & Hou, Y. T. (2000). QoS enabled voice support in the next generation internet: Issues, existing approaches and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 38, 54–61.Google Scholar
- Liang, L., & Atkins, D. (2013). Designing service level agreements for inventory management. Production and Operations Management, 22, 1103–1117.Google Scholar
- Rana, O., Warnier, M., Quillinan, T. B., & Brazier, F. (2008). Monitoring and reputation mechanisms for service level agreements. In Grid economics and business models (pp. 125–139). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Tektaş, B., & Kasap, N. (2008). Time and volume based optimal pricing strategies for telecommunication networks. In IAMOT 2008. The British University in Dubai.Google Scholar
- Turan, H. H., Kasap, N., & Tektaş Sivrikaya, B. (2010). The effects of QoS level degradation cost on provider selection and task allocation model in telecommunication networks. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 2, 45–53.Google Scholar