Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 263, Issue 1–2, pp 247–269 | Cite as

DEA as a tool for auditing: application to Chinese manufacturing industry with parallel network structures

  • Yande Gong
  • Joe Zhu
  • Ya Chen
  • Wade D. Cook
Data Mining and Analytics

Abstract

Performing a high-quality manufacturing audit can be time consuming and costly given the large number and scale of manufacturing firms and enterprises. Chinese economy has experienced some rapid and significant growth over the past 30 years, which is largely due to contributions from the development of manufacturing industry. Auditing tools are very much needed in auditing the Chinese manufacturing industry. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been used as an auditing tool in selecting audit objects that are treated as decision making units (DMUs). These DMUs are characterized by a set of performance measures. DEA then uses data on these performance measures to identify potential audit objects. However, conventional DEA treat each DMU or system as a “black-box” and does not take the operations of individual components within the “black-box” into consideration. For example, a large number of firms or enterprises exist in a manufacturing industry. When the conventional DEA is applied to the industries, the performance of the firms is often ignored. This paper proposes a new parallel DEA model where each input/output of the system is not the sum of those of all its components. Such a situation arises from the need of auditing firms or enterprises in Chinese manufacturing industries. For example, the cost margin of a particular industry may not equal to the sum of that of all its component firms within the industry because this metric is measured in percentage. The proposed approach is applied to the manufacturing industry of China.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Parallel systems Effciency  Manufacturing industry Auditing Performance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers on an earlier version of this paper. Dr. Yande Gong thanks the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71302178) and “Qinglan” Engineering of Jiangsu Province. Support from the Priority Academic Program Development of the Jianhsu Higher Education Institutions (China) is acknowledged.

References

  1. Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39, 1261–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for the estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beasley, J. E. (1995). Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(4), 441–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bi, G., Ding, J., Luo, Y., & Liang, L. (2011). Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(9), 4270–4280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bi, G., Feng, C. P., Ding, J. J., & Khan, M. R. (2012). Estimating relative efficiency of DMU: Pareto principle and Monte Carlo oriented DEA approach. INFOR, 50(1), 44–57.Google Scholar
  6. Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2004). DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castelli, L., Presenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2010). A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 207–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chao, C. M., Yu, M. M., & Chen, M. C. (2010). Measuring the performance of financial holding companies. The Service Industries Journal, 30(30), 811–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Y., Cook, W.D., Du, J., Hu, H. & Zhu, J. (2015). Bounded and discrete data and Likert scales in data envelopment analysis: Application to regional energy efficiency in China. Annals of Operations Research (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Chen, C. L., Zhu, J., Yu, J. Y., & Noori, H. (2012). A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(2), 348–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2004). Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management Journal, 5(1–2), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chilingerian, J. A., & Sherman, H. D. (1996). Benchmarking physician practice patterns with DEA: A multi-stage approach for cost containment. Annals of Operations Research, 67(1), 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook, W. D., & Green, R. H. (2004). Multicomponent efficiency measurement and core business identification in multiplant firms: A DEA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 157(3), 540–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cook, W. D., Hababou, M., & Tuenter, H. J. H. (2000). Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: An application to sales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 14(3), 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. OMEGA, 44, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diez-Ticio, A., & Mancebon, M. J. (2002). The efficiency of the Spanish police service: An application of the multiactivity DEA model. Applied Economics, 34(3), 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Du, J., Chen, Y., & Huo, J. (2015a). DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks. Omega, 56, 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Du, J., Zhu, J., Cook, W., & Huo, J. (2015b). DEA models for parallel systems: Game-theoretic approaches. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 32(2), 1550008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fang, K., Hong, X., Li, S., Song, M., & Zhang, J. (2013). Choosing competitive industries in manufacturing of China under low-carbon economy: A three-stage DEA analysis. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 5(4), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Färe, R., Grabowski, R., Grosskopf, S., & Kraft, S. (1997). Efficiency of a fixed but allocatable input: A non-parametric approach. Economics Letters, 56(2), 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economic Letters, 50(1), 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Färe, R., & Primont, D. (1984). Efficiency measures for multiplant firms. Operations Research Letters, 3(5), 257–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamyabi, Y., & Salahinejad, M. (2014). Using data envelopment analysis to examine operational auditing efficiency in audited firms. International Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Research, 3(3), 135–142.Google Scholar
  26. Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1107–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2010). Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decision Support Systems, 48, 437–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kao, C., & Lin, P. H. (2012). Efficiency of parallel production systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 198(7), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, J., Zhou, P., & Zhu, Y. (2014). The Efficiency and productivity for manufacturing industries in China with network structure considering undesirable output. Asian Social Science, 10(18), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu, T., & Li, K. W. (2012). Analyzing China’s productivity growth: Evidence from manufacturing industries. Economic Systems, 36(4), 531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogge, N., & Jaeger, S. (2012). Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in collecting and processing municipal solid waste: A shared input DEA-model. Waste Management, 32(10), 1968–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sherman, H. D. (1984). Data envelopment analysis as a new managerial audit methodology-test and evaluation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 4(1), 35–53.Google Scholar
  34. Sueyoshi, T., Shang, J., & Chiang, W. (2009). A decision support framework for internal audit prioritization in a rental car company: A combined use between DEA and AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(1), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun, H., Hone, P., & Doucouliago, H. (1999). Economic openness and technical efficiency: A case study of Chinese manufacturing industries. The Economics of Transition, 7(3), 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsai, P. F., & Mar Molinero, C. (2002). A variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis model for the joint determination of efficiencies with an example of the UK health service. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vaz, C. B., Camanho, A. S., & Guimarães, R. C. (2010). The assessment of retailing efficiency using network data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, G. Z., Wu, J. R., & Liu, J. (2010). Evaluation and analysis of input–output efficiency of regional equipment manufacturing industry based on DEA method. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 4, 1661–1666.Google Scholar
  39. Yang, L., Yang, H., Fang, K., Ye, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecological Indicators, 51, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang, Y., Ma, B., & Koike, M. (2000). Efficiency-measuring DEA model for production system with k independent subsystems. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 43(3), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu, M. M. (2008). Measuring the efficiency and return to scale status of multimode bus transit—Evidence from Taiwan’s bus system. Applied Economics Letters, 15(8), 647–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yu, M. M., & Fan, C. K. (2006). Measuring the cost effectiveness of multimode bus transit in the presence of accident risks. Transportation Planning and Technology, 29(5), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang, D. Z., & Zhang, D. M. (2013). A study of environmental management efficiency using the DEA method: Focus on manufacturing by district in China. Journal of Management Research, 13(1), 11–24.Google Scholar
  44. Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(1), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Center for Auditing and EvaluationNanjing Audit UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Foisie School of BusinessWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA
  3. 3.School of EconomicsHefei University of TechnologyHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations