Optimizing high-level nuclear waste disposal within a deep geologic repository
Many countries produce significant quantities of nuclear waste which will have to be permanently and safely placed in a repository. We develop a mixed integer program that determines where to place each waste package of a specific waste type in a given time period with the goal of minimizing heat load concentration within a repository. Operational constraints include: (1) heat load limitations, (2) location and time at which waste packages can be placed, and (3) the number of waste packages that must be placed based on type and time period. Although applicable to other settings, we use the Yucca Mountain repository in Nevada as a case study. Each of the three objectives used for minimizing heat load concentration improves upon existing greedy and sequential filling methods. Existing filling methods give at least a 17 % to an 873 % higher, i.e., worse, heat load concentration in the repository with respect to these objectives than do optimal methods. Enhancements, i.e., symmetry reduction constraints, perturbations, and heuristics, increase the size of solvable problem instances. This research can be applied to any deep geologic repository planned for operation around the world with slight modifications to incorporate site-specific objectives and constraints.
KeywordsLarge-scale optimization Facilities planning and design Applied integer programming Nuclear waste disposal
We acknowledge the insights provided by Eduardo Moreno of Universidad Adolfo Ibañez and Daniel Espinoza of Universidad de Chile regarding the time-independent placement heuristic. We also acknowledge helpful comments provided by the anonymous reviewers on a previous draft of this paper.
- AMPL Optimization LLC. (2013). AMPL Version 20130109.Google Scholar
- Crowe, B. Y., Rawlinson, S., Black, P., Carilli, J., & Disanza, F. (2002). Application of probabilistic performance assessment modeling for optimization of maintenance studies for low-level radioactive waste disposal sites at the Nevada Test Site. In Proceedings waste management ’02 Tucson, Arizona, Paper 364.Google Scholar
- Filbert, W., Bollingerfehr, W., Wehrmann, J., & Graf, R. (2008). Optimization of emplacement technology for spent fuel. In Proceedings EAFORM.Google Scholar
- Fourer, R., Gay, D., & Kernighan, B. (2003). AMPL—A modeling language for mathematical programming. Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Hutchinson, W. (1983). A linear program for assessing the assignment and scheduling of radioactive wastes for disposal to sea, Technical Report. Bedford: Hunting Engineering Ltd.Google Scholar
- IBM ILOG AMPL. (2010). Version 12.2 User’s Guide: Standard (Command-line) Version Including CPLEX Directives.Google Scholar
- International Business Machines. (2014). CPLEX Version 220.127.116.11.Google Scholar
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. (2005). How one equation changed the world. https://str.llnl.gov/str/September05/Aufderheide.html.
- Lerchs, H., & Grossmann, I. F. (1965). Optimum design of open pit mines. CIM Bulletin, 58, 47–54.Google Scholar
- Lewis, E. E. (2008). Fundamentals of nuclear reactor physics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- McCullough, G., Jr. (2014). The other senate nuclear option. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/glenn-mccullough-midterms-yucca-mountain-and-the-other-senate-nuclear-option-1414366541
- Mohr, C., & O’Brien, P. (1973). Decision mapping-tool for underground waste management. IAHS Publ no. III (pp. 731–737).Google Scholar
- Nuclear Energy Institute. (2014). US State by State Used Fuel and Payments to the Nuclear Waste Fund. http://www.nei.org/Knowledge-Center/Nuclear-Statistics/On-Site-Storage-of-Nuclear-Waste/US-State-by-State-Used-Fuel-and-Payments-to-the-Nu.
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2008). Yucca Mountain Repository License Application: Safety Analysis Report, Technical report. DOE/RW-0573, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.Google Scholar
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2014). Stages of the nuclear fuel cycle. http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/stages-fuel-cycle.html.
- Pochet, Y., & Wolsey, L. A. (2006). Production planning by mixed integer programming. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Posiva. (2015). Final Disposal Facility. http://www.posiva.fi/en/final_disposal/final_disposal_facility/repository#.Vl4Mxb8qLoM.
- Rautman, C. A., Reid, R. A., & Ryder, E. E. (1993). Scheduling the disposal of nuclear waste material in a geologic repository using the transportation model. Operations Research, 41(3), 459–469.Google Scholar
- SKB. (2014). SKB—Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. http://www.skb.se/default____24417.aspx.
- Taji, K., Levy, J. K., Hartmann, J., Bell, M. L., Anderson, R., Hobbs, B., et al. (2005). Identifying potential repositories for radioactive waste: Multiple criteria decision analysis and critical infrastructure systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 1(4), 404–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsoulfanidis, N. (2013). The nuclear fuel cycle. Lagange Park: American Nuclear Society.Google Scholar
- World Nuclear Association. (2014). Radioactive Waste Management. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-wastes/radioactive-waste-management/.
- Yucca Mountain Project. (2009). Yucca Mountain, Nevada. http://www.ymp.gov.