Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 253, Issue 2, pp 733–755 | Cite as

Optimizing high-level nuclear waste disposal within a deep geologic repository

S.I.: LOT
  • 455 Downloads

Abstract

Many countries produce significant quantities of nuclear waste which will have to be permanently and safely placed in a repository. We develop a mixed integer program that determines where to place each waste package of a specific waste type in a given time period with the goal of minimizing heat load concentration within a repository. Operational constraints include: (1) heat load limitations, (2) location and time at which waste packages can be placed, and (3) the number of waste packages that must be placed based on type and time period. Although applicable to other settings, we use the Yucca Mountain repository in Nevada as a case study. Each of the three objectives used for minimizing heat load concentration improves upon existing greedy and sequential filling methods. Existing filling methods give at least a 17 % to an 873 % higher, i.e., worse, heat load concentration in the repository with respect to these objectives than do optimal methods. Enhancements, i.e., symmetry reduction constraints, perturbations, and heuristics, increase the size of solvable problem instances. This research can be applied to any deep geologic repository planned for operation around the world with slight modifications to incorporate site-specific objectives and constraints.

Keywords

Large-scale optimization Facilities planning and design Applied integer programming Nuclear waste disposal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the insights provided by Eduardo Moreno of Universidad Adolfo Ibañez and Daniel Espinoza of Universidad de Chile regarding the time-independent placement heuristic. We also acknowledge helpful comments provided by the anonymous reviewers on a previous draft of this paper.

References

  1. Alumur, S., & Kara, B. Y. (2007). A new model for the hazardous waste location-routing problem. Computers & Operations Research, 34(5), 1406–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AMPL Optimization LLC. (2013). AMPL Version 20130109.Google Scholar
  3. Angilella, S., Bottero, M., Corrente, S., Ferretti, V., Greco, S., & Lami, I. M. (2015). Non additive robust ordinal regression for urban and territorial planning: An application for siting an urban waste landfill. Annals of Operations Research,. doi: 10.1007/s10479-015-1787-7.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, G., Keegan, J., Vigus, B., & Wood, K. (2001). The Kellogg company optimizes production, inventory, and distribution. Interfaces, 31(6), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chicoisne, R., Espinoza, D., Goycoolea, M., Moreno, E., & Rubio, E. (2012). A new algorithm for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem. Operations Research, 60(3), 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowe, B. Y., Rawlinson, S., Black, P., Carilli, J., & Disanza, F. (2002). Application of probabilistic performance assessment modeling for optimization of maintenance studies for low-level radioactive waste disposal sites at the Nevada Test Site. In Proceedings waste management ’02 Tucson, Arizona, Paper 364.Google Scholar
  7. Erkut, E., & Neuman, S. (1992). A multiobjective model for locating undesirable facilities. Annals of Operations Research, 40(1), 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Espinoza, D., Goycoolea, M., Moreno, E., & Newman, A. (2013). MineLib: A library of open pit mining problems. Annals of Operations Research, 206(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ewing, R. C., & Macfarlane, A. (2002). Nuclear waste: Yucca Mountain. Science, 296(5568), 659–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Filbert, W., Bollingerfehr, W., Wehrmann, J., & Graf, R. (2008). Optimization of emplacement technology for spent fuel. In Proceedings EAFORM.Google Scholar
  11. Fourer, R., Gay, D., & Kernighan, B. (2003). AMPL—A modeling language for mathematical programming. Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  12. Geoffrion, A. M., & Nauss, R. (1977). Exceptional paper-parametric and postoptimality analysis in integer linear programming. Management Science, 23(5), 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghose, M., Dikshit, A. K., & Sharma, S. (2006). A GIS based transportation model for solid waste disposal—a case study on Asansol municipality. Waste Management, 26(11), 1287–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giannikos, I. (1998). A multiobjective programming model for locating treatment sites and routing hazardous wastes. European Journal of Operational Research, 104(2), 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutchinson, W. (1983). A linear program for assessing the assignment and scheduling of radioactive wastes for disposal to sea, Technical Report. Bedford: Hunting Engineering Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. IBM ILOG AMPL. (2010). Version 12.2 User’s Guide: Standard (Command-line) Version Including CPLEX Directives.Google Scholar
  17. International Business Machines. (2014). CPLEX Version 12.6.0.1.Google Scholar
  18. Jin, D. (1994). Multimedia waste disposal optimization under uncertainty with an ocean option. Marine Resource Economics, 9(2), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambert, W., & Newman, A. (2014). Tailored Lagrangian Relaxation for the open pit block sequencing problem. Annals of Operations Research, 222(1), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. (2005). How one equation changed the world. https://str.llnl.gov/str/September05/Aufderheide.html.
  21. Leao, S., Bishop, I., & Evans, D. (2001). Assessing the demand of solid waste disposal in urban region by urban dynamics modelling in a GIS environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 33(4), 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lerchs, H., & Grossmann, I. F. (1965). Optimum design of open pit mines. CIM Bulletin, 58, 47–54.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, E. E. (2008). Fundamentals of nuclear reactor physics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. McCullough, G., Jr. (2014). The other senate nuclear option. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/glenn-mccullough-midterms-yucca-mountain-and-the-other-senate-nuclear-option-1414366541
  25. Mohr, C., & O’Brien, P. (1973). Decision mapping-tool for underground waste management. IAHS Publ no. III (pp. 731–737).Google Scholar
  26. Nuclear Energy Institute. (2014). US State by State Used Fuel and Payments to the Nuclear Waste Fund. http://www.nei.org/Knowledge-Center/Nuclear-Statistics/On-Site-Storage-of-Nuclear-Waste/US-State-by-State-Used-Fuel-and-Payments-to-the-Nu.
  27. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2008). Yucca Mountain Repository License Application: Safety Analysis Report, Technical report. DOE/RW-0573, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.Google Scholar
  28. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2014). Stages of the nuclear fuel cycle. http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/stages-fuel-cycle.html.
  29. Pochet, Y., & Wolsey, L. A. (2006). Production planning by mixed integer programming. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Rautman, C. A., Reid, R. A., & Ryder, E. E. (1993). Scheduling the disposal of nuclear waste material in a geologic repository using the transportation model. Operations Research, 41(3), 459–469.Google Scholar
  31. Sherali, H. D., & Smith, J. C. (2001). Improving discrete model representations via symmetry considerations. Management Science, 47(10), 1396–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. SKB. (2014). SKB—Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. http://www.skb.se/default____24417.aspx.
  33. Taji, K., Levy, J. K., Hartmann, J., Bell, M. L., Anderson, R., Hobbs, B., et al. (2005). Identifying potential repositories for radioactive waste: Multiple criteria decision analysis and critical infrastructure systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 1(4), 404–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsoulfanidis, N. (2013). The nuclear fuel cycle. Lagange Park: American Nuclear Society.Google Scholar
  35. Tung, D. V., & Pinnoi, A. (2000). Vehicle routing-scheduling for waste collection in Hanoi. European Journal of Operational Research, 125(3), 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. World Nuclear Association. (2014). Radioactive Waste Management. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-wastes/radioactive-waste-management/.
  37. Yucca Mountain Project. (2009). Yucca Mountain, Nevada. http://www.ymp.gov.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Johnson
    • 1
  • Alexandra Newman
    • 1
  • Jeffrey King
    • 2
  1. 1.Operations Research with Engineering ProgramColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA
  2. 2.Nuclear Science and Engineering ProgramColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations