Managing soil natural capital: a prudent strategy for adapting to future risks
- 325 Downloads
Farmers are exposed to substantial weather and market related risks. Rational farmers seek to avoid large losses. Future climate change and energy price fluctuations therefore make adaptating to increased risks particularly important for them. Managing soil natural capital—the capacity of the soil to generate ecosystem services of benefit to farmers—has been proven to generate the double dividend: increasing farm profit and reducing associated risk. In this paper we explore whether managing soil natural capital has a third dividend: reducing the downside risk (increasing the positive skewness of profit). This we refer to as the prudence effect which can be viewed as an adaptation strategy for dealing with future uncertainties through more prudent management of soil natural capital. We do this by developing a dynamic stochastic portfolio model to optimize the stock of soil natural capital—as indicated by soil organic carbon (SOC) content—that considers the mean, variance and skewness of profits from arable farming. The SOC state variable can be managed by the farmer only indirectly through the spatial and temporal allocation of land use. We model four cash crops and a grass ley that generates no market return but replenishes SOC. We find that managing soil natural capital can, not only improve farm profit while reducing the risk, but also reduce the downside risk. Prudent adaptation to future risks should therefore consider the impact of current agricultural management practices on the stock of soil natural capital.
KeywordsAdaptation strategy Mean–variance–skewness (MVS) portfolio model Prudence Soil organic carbon Soil ecosystem services Sustainable agriculture
This research is supported by the European Commission through the EcoFINDERS Project (FP7-264465), the Swedish Research Council Formas through the projects “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in a Changing Climate (BECC)” and “Sustainable Agriculture for the Production of Ecosystem Services (SAPES)”. We are grateful to the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) for access to data from the Scanian long-term field experiments that made this study possible.
- Adler, R. F., Gu, G., Wang, J. J., Huffman, G. J., Curtis, S., & Bolvin, D. (2008). Relationships between global precipitation and surface temperature on interannual and longer timescales (1979–2006). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012). doi: 10.1029/2008JD010536.
- Agriwise. (2011). Agriwise—Data book for production planning and regional enterprise budgets. Uppsala: Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU).Google Scholar
- Carlgren, K., & Mattsson, L. (2001). Swedish soil fertility experiments. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Plant Soil Science, 51(2), 49–76.Google Scholar
- Cong, R.-G., & Brady, M. (2012a). How to design a targeted agricultural subsidy system: Efficiency or equity? PloS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041225.
- Cong, R.-G., & Brady, M. (2012b). The interdependence between rainfall and temperature: copula analyses. The Scientific World Journal, 2012. doi: 10.1100/2012/405675.
- Cong, R.-G., Hedlund, K., Andersson, H., & Brady, M. (2014a). Managing soil natural capital: an effective strategy for mitigating future agricultural risks? Agricultural Systems, 129, 30–39.Google Scholar
- de Ruiter, P. C., Neutel, A.-M., Moore, J. (2005). The balance between productivity and food web structure in soil ecosystems. In R. D. Bardgett, M. B. Usher, D. W. Hopkins (eds.), Biological diversity and Function in Soils (pp. 139–153), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- European Commission (2014a). Agricultural and rural development Taking care of our roots. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-for-our-roots/index_en.htm. Accessed 07 September 2015.
- European Commission (2014b). The Common Agriculture Policy after 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-post-2013/. Accessed 07 September 2015.
- Foudi, S., & Erdlenbruch, K. (2011). The role of irrigation in farmers’ risk management strategies in France. European Review of Agricultural Economics. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbr024.
- Held, R. B., & Clawson, M. (2013). Soil conservation in perspective (Vol. 4). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Herrick, J. E., & Wander, M. M. (1997). Relationships between soil organic carbon and soil quality in cropped and rangeland soils: the importance of distribution, composition, and soil biological activity. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Kimball, M. S. (1990). Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 58(1), 53–73.Google Scholar
- Knutson, C., Hayes, M., & Phillips, T. (1998). How to reduce drought risk. http://drought.unl.edu/portals/0/docs/risk.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2015.
- Koch, R. (2011). The 80/20 principle: The secret to achieving more with less. New York: Random House LLC.Google Scholar
- Koundouri, P., Laukkanen, M., Myyrä, S., & Nauges, C. (2009). The effects of EU agricultural policy changes on farmers’ risk attitudes. European Review of Agricultural Economics. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbp003.
- Li, Y. L., McAllister, T. A., Beauchemin, K. A., He, M. L., McKinnon, J. J., & Yang, W. Z. (2011). Substitution of wheat dried distillers grains with solubles for barley grain or barley silage in feedlot cattle diets: Intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science, 89(8), 2491–2501. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lien, D., & Yu, C. F. J. (2014). Production and anticipatory hedging under time-inconsistent preferences. Journal of Futures Markets, 35(10), 961–985.Google Scholar
- Liu, C., Allan, R. P., & Huffman, G. J. (2012). Co-variation of temperature and precipitation in CMIP5 models and satellite observations. Geophysical Research Letters. doi: 10.1029/2012GL052093.
- Nandwa, S. (2001b). Soil organic carbon (SOC) management for sustainable productivity of cropping and agro-forestry systems in Eastern and Southern Africa. In C. Martius, H. Tiessen, & P. L. G. Vlek (Eds.), Managing organic matter in tropical soils: Scope and limitations. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences (Vol. 93, pp. 143–158). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Samuelson, P. A. (1970). The fundamental approximation theorem of portfolio analysis in terms of means, variances and higher moments. The Review of Economic Studies, 37(4), 537–542.Google Scholar
- SCB. (2012). Jordbrukstatistik årsbok 2012 (Yearbook of agricultural statistics 2012). Örebro: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
- Trenberth, K. E., & Shea, D. J. (2005). Relationships between precipitation and surface temperature. Geophysical Research Letters. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022760.
- Weitzman, M. L. (2000). Economic profitability versus ecological entropy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 237–263.Google Scholar
- Zhu, Y., Ghosh, S. K., & Goodwin, B. K. (2008). Modeling dependence in the design of whole-farm insurance contract: A copula-based model approach. In Annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Orlando, FL, 2008 (pp. 27–29).Google Scholar