Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 247, Issue 2, pp 677–692 | Cite as

Private labels and retail assortment planning: a differential evolution approach

  • Stelios Tsafarakis
  • Charalampos Saridakis
  • Nikolaos Matsatsinis
  • George Baltas
Article

Abstract

Despite the longstanding recognition of the importance of product assortment planning (PAP), existing literature has failed to provide satisfactory solutions to a great deal of problems that reside in this area of research. The issue of optimal assortment planning in the retail sector becomes even more important in periods of economic crisis, as retailers must adapt their product portfolios to new evolving patterns of consumer buying behaviour and reduced levels of consumer’s purchasing power. Private labels (PLs) typically experience significant growth in times of recession, due to their low prices, and the reduced disposable income of households. In this direction, the present paper introduces differential evolution to assist retailers in adapting their product portfolios in periods of economic recession and facilitate strategic PAP decisions, related to (a) optimal variety of PL product categories, (b) optimal service level of PL merchandise within a product category, and hence, (c) optimal balance between PLs and National Brands in a retailer’s product portfolio. The interrelated issue of assortment adaptation across different store formats is also considered. Economic recessions contribute to the prolonged upward evolution in PL share, and hence, our mechanism facilitates decisions that are nowadays more important than ever before. The proposed mechanism is illustrated through an implementation to an empirical dataset derived from a random sample of 1928 consumers who participated in a large-scale computer assisted telephone survey during the current economic crisis period.

Keywords

Product assortment planning Differential evolution  Private label Economic crisis 

References

  1. Anderson, E. E., & Amato, H. N. (1974). A mathematical model for simultaneously determine the optimal brand-collection and display area allocation. Operations Research, 22(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai, R., & Kendall, G. (2005). An investigation of automated planograms using a simulated annealing based hyper-heuristics. In T. Ibaraki, K. Nonobe, & M. Yagiura (Eds.), Metaheuristics: progress as real problem solvers, operations research/computer science interfaces (Vol. 32, pp. 87–108). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boatwright, P., & Nunes, J. C. (2001). Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borin, N., & Farris, P. (1995). A sensitivity analysis of retailer shelf management models. Journal of Retailing, 71(2), 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borin, N., Farris, P. W., & Freeland, J. R. (1994). A model for determining retail product category assortment and shelf space allocation. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brijs, T., Goethals, B., Swinnen, G., Vanhoof, K., & Wets, G. (2000). A data mining framework for optimal product selection in retail supermarket data: The generalized PROFSET model. In Proceedings of the ACM Seventh International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2000) (pp. 300–304), New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brijs, T., Swinnen, G., Vanhoof, K., & Wets, G. (1999). Using association rules for product assortment decisions: a case study. In KDD-99 (pp. 254–260). San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Bultez, A., & Naert, P. (1988). SHARP: Shelf allocation for retailers’ profit. Marketing Science, 7(3), 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bultez, A., Naert, P., Gijbrechts, E., & Abeele, P. V. (1989). Asymmetric cannibalism in retail assortment. Journal of Retailing, 65(2), 153–192.Google Scholar
  10. Cachon, G. P., Terwiesch, C., & Xu, Y. (2005). Retail assortment planning in the presence of consumer search. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 7(4), 330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campo, K., Gijsbrechts, E., & Nisol, P. (2003). The impact of retailer stockouts on whether, how much, and what to buy. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(3), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corstjens, M., & Doyle, P. (1981). A model for optimizing retail space allocations. Management Science, 27(7), 822–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corstjens, M., & Doyle, P. (1983). A dynamic model for strategically allocating retail space. Journal of Operational Research Society, 34(10), 943–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das, S., & Suganthan, P. N. (2011). Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 15(1), 4–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhar, S. K., Hoch, S. J., & Kumar, N. (2001). Effective category management depends on the role of the category. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engelbrecht, A. P. (2007). Computational intelligence: An introduction. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fadılog̃lu, M. M., Karaşan, O. E., & Pınar, M. Ç. (2010). A model and case study for efficient shelf usage and assortment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 180(1), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzsimons, G. J. (2000). Consumer response to stockouts. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gómez-Suárez, M. (2005). Shelf space assigned to store and national brands: A neural networks analysis. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(11), 858–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, P., & Heinsbroek, H. (1979). Product selection and space allocation in supermarkets. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(6), 474–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herstein, R., & Gamliel, E. (2006). The role of private branding in improving service quality. Managing Service Quality, 16(3), 306–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopp, W. J., & Xu, X. (2008). A static approximation for dynamic demand substitution with applications in a competitive market. Operations Research, 56(3), 630–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hübner, A. H., & Kuhn, H. (2012). Retail category management: State-of-the-art review of quantitative research and software applications in assortment and shelf space management. Omega, 40(2), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Islam, S. M., Das, S., Ghosh, S., Roy, S., & Suganthan, P. N. (2012). An adaptive differential evolution algorithm with novel mutation and crossover strategies for global numerical optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 42(2), 482–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simmulated annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kök, A. G., & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Operations Research, 55(6), 1001–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kök, A. G., Fisher, M. L., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2005). Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. In N. Agrawal & S. Smith (Eds.), Retail supply chain management. Amsterdam: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  29. Krink, T., Mittnik, S., & Paterlini, S. (2009). Differential evolution and combinatorial search for constrained index-tracking. Annals of Operations Research, 172(1), 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lamey, L., Deleersnyder, B., Dekimpe, M. G., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2007). How business cycles contribute to private-label success: Evidence from the United States and Europe. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lampinen, J., & Storn, R. (2004). Differential evolution. In G. C., Onwubolu et al. (Eds.), New optimization techniques in engineering (pp. 123–166). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  32. Lampinen, J., & Zelinka, I. (1999). Mixed integer-discrete-continuous optimization by differential evolution, Part 1: the optimization method. In Pavel Ošmera (Ed.), Proceedings of MENDEL’99, 5th international mendel conference on soft computing, June 9–12 (pp. 71–76). Brno, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  33. Li, Z. (2007). A single-period assortment optimization model. Production and Operations Management, 16(3), 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lieckens, K., & Vandaele, N. (2015). Differential evolution to solve the lot size problem in stochastic supply chain management systems. Annals of Operations Research, 224(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  35. Mahajan, S., & van Ryzin, G. (2001). Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Operations Research, 49(3), 334–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahajan, S., & van Ryzin, G. J. (1998). Retail inventories and consumer choice. In S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, & M. Magazine (Eds.), Quantitative methods in supply chain management. Amsterdam: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  37. Mantrala, M. K., Levy, M., Kahn, B. E., Fox, E. J., Gaidarev, P., Dankworth, B., et al. (2009). Why is assortment planning so difficult for retailers? A framework and research agenda. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mezura-Montes, E., Velázquez-Reyes, J., & Coello Coello, C. A. (2006). A comparative study of differential evolution variants for global optimization. In Maarten Keijzer, et al. (Eds.), Genetic and evolutionary computation conference. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mohamed, A. W., & Sabry, H. Z. (2012). Constrained optimization based on modified differential evolution algorithm. Information Sciences, 194, 171–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nandan, S., & Dickinson, R. (1994). Private brands: Major brand perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11, 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nogales, A. F., & Gómez-Suárez, M. (2005). Shelf space management of private labels: A case study in Spanish retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(3), 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connell, V. (2008). Reversing field, Macy’s goes local, Wall Street Journal, (April 21), B1.Google Scholar
  43. Price, K., Storn, R., & Lampinen, J. (2005). Differential evolution: A practical approach to global optimization., Natural Computing Series New York, Secaucus, NJ: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Quelch, J. A., & Harding, D. (1996). Brands versus private labels: Fighting to win. Harvard Business Review, 37, 99–109.Google Scholar
  45. Rajaram, K., & Tang, C. S. (2001). The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(3), 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Russell, R. A., & Urban, T. L. (2010). The location and allocation of products and product families on retail shelves. Annals of Operations Research, 179(1), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ryzin, G. V., & Mahajan, S. (1999). On the relationship between inventory costs and variety benefits in retail assortments. Management Science, 45(11), 1496–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shah, J., & Avittathur, B. (2007). The retailer multi-item inventory problem with demand cannibalization and substitution. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(1), 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sloot, L. M., & Verhoef, P. C. (2008). The impact of brand delisting on store switching and brand switching intentions. Journal of Retailing, 84(3), 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, S. A., & Agrawal, N. (2000). Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Operations Research, 48(1), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution: A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Urban, T. L. (1998). An inventory-theoretic approach to product assortment and shelf space allocation. Journal of Retailing, 74(1), 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xin, G., Messinger, P. R., & Li, J. (2009). Influence of soldout products on consumer choice. Journal of Retailing, 85(3), 274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang, M. H. (2001). An efficient algorithm to allocate shelf space. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(1), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yücel, E., Karaesmen, F., Salman, F. S., & Türkay, M. (2009). Optimizing product assortment under customer-driven demand substitution. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 759–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stelios Tsafarakis
    • 1
  • Charalampos Saridakis
    • 2
  • Nikolaos Matsatsinis
    • 1
  • George Baltas
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Production Engineering and ManagementTechnical University of CreteChaniaGreece
  2. 2.Leeds University Business SchoolUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  3. 3.Department of Marketing and CommunicationAthens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations