Skip to main content
Log in

Aggregate directional distance formulation of DEA with integer variables

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models make the assumption of non-negativity and real values in the input and output of the systems that are under study. This paper combines these two interrelated ideas. One is the non-radial measurement of efficiency by establishing an aggregate directional distance formulation of the DEA model (ADDM). Another is the introduction of an integer directional distance function. Usually, directional distance formulations of DEA and ADDM projections of efficient targets for inefficient decision making units (DMUs) have non-integer values. In this paper directional distance function is modified and a mixed integer directional distance formulation of DEA is proposed. This model guarantees integer targets for inefficient DMUs and is applicable to measure efficiency even when input and output variables are negative integer values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banker, R. (1993). Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: A statistical foundation. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R., & Morey, R. (1986). The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 32(12), 1613–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1996). Benefit and distance function. Journal of Economic Theory, 70, 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1998). Profit directional distance functions and Nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization and Theory and Applications, 12, 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(4), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y. H., Färe, R., & Grooskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Managements, 51, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Pastor, J. T. (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11, 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Borger, B., Ferrier, G. D., & Kerstens, K. (1998). The choice of technical efficiency measure on the free disposal hull reference technology: A comparison using US banking data. European Journal of Operational Research, 105, 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diabat, A., Shetty, U., & Pakkala, T. P. M. (2015). Improved efficiency measures through directional distance formulation of data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 229(1), 325–346.

  • Emrouznejad, A., Anouze, A. L., & Thanassoulis, E. (2010a). A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., Amin, R. A., Thanassoulis, E., & Anouze, A. L. (2010b). On the bounedness of the SORM DEA models with negative data. European Journal of Operational Research, 206, 265–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., & De Witte, K. (2010). COOPER-frameork: A unified process for non-parametric projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1573–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Theory and application of directional distance function. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2010). Directional distance functions and slack-based measures of efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 320–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(1), 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). Measurement of efficiency of production. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama & Weber (2009). A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43, 274–287.

  • Kamakura, W. (1988). A note on the use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 34(10), 1273–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, T., & Matin, Kazemi. (2009). Theory of integer valued data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2006). Data envelopment analysis of integer valued inputs and outputs. Computers and Operations Research, 33, 3004–3014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. G. (1992). Benefits, functions and duality. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 21, 461–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matin, K., & Kuosmanen, T. (2009). Theory of integer valued data envelopment analysis under alternative returns to scale. Omega, 37, 988–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (1999). An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 596–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J., & Semple, J. (1993). Categorical outputs in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(3), 384–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J. A., Meng, W., & Liu, W. (2007). A modified slacks based measure model for data envelopment analysis with natural negative outputs and inputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1672–1677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva Portela, M. C. A., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 1111–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, M., & Tanaka, K. (2007). Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry: A directional distance approach. Energy Policy, 35, 6323–6331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Youchao Tan’s research is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant no 71302005, humanities and social sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education in China, Grant no 14YJC630049.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udaya Shetty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, Y., Shetty, U., Diabat, A. et al. Aggregate directional distance formulation of DEA with integer variables. Ann Oper Res 235, 741–756 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1891-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1891-8

Keywords

Navigation